Literature DB >> 22606165

Oosporein from Tremella fuciformis.

Gang He, Jun Yan, Xiao-Yong Wu, Xiao-Jun Gou, Wan-Chen Li.   

Abstract

THE TITLE COMPOUND [SYSTEMATIC NAME: 3,3',6,6'-tetra-hydroxy-4,4'-dimethyl-1,1'-bi(cyclo-hexa-3,6-diene)-2,2',5,5'-tetra-one], C(14)H(10)O(8), was isolated from Tremella fuciformis. The mol-ecule has 2 symmetry, with the mid-point of the C-C bond linking the cyclo-hexa-dienedione rings located on a twofold rotation axis. In the mol-ecule, the ring is approximately planar, with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.0093 Å, and the two rings make a dihedral angle of 67.89 (5)°. Inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonding occurs in the crystal structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22606165      PMCID: PMC3344162          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812012950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to the title compound, see: Takeshita & Anchel (1965 ▶). For the chemical structure of the title compound established from NMR data, see: Richard et al. (1974 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C14H10O8 M = 306.22 Monoclinic, a = 11.9983 (9) Å b = 8.2981 (6) Å c = 13.7634 (11) Å β = 105.994 (7)° V = 1317.28 (17) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.13 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.25 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Eos diffractometer 2848 measured reflections 1342 independent reflections 937 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.044 wR(F 2) = 0.118 S = 1.06 1342 reflections 103 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.21 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis CCD; data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812012950/xu5486sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812012950/xu5486Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812012950/xu5486Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C14H10O8F(000) = 632
Mr = 306.22Dx = 1.544 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 11.9983 (9) ÅCell parameters from 884 reflections
b = 8.2981 (6) Åθ = 3.0–28.7°
c = 13.7634 (11) ŵ = 0.13 mm1
β = 105.994 (7)°T = 293 K
V = 1317.28 (17) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.25 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Eos diffractometer937 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.022
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 3.0°
Detector resolution: 10.0 pixels mm-1h = −14→11
ω scansk = −9→10
2848 measured reflectionsl = −17→13
1342 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.118H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0491P)2 + 0.4579P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1342 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
103 parametersΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.17 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.82546 (12)0.06885 (18)0.65807 (11)0.0380 (4)
O20.79548 (13)0.0605 (2)0.45935 (11)0.0434 (5)
H20.76230.01350.49580.065*
O31.16014 (12)0.3820 (2)0.71051 (11)0.0402 (5)
H31.19650.42290.67440.060*
O41.12577 (13)0.3814 (2)0.51152 (12)0.0454 (5)
C10.95888 (17)0.2202 (2)0.47435 (15)0.0275 (5)
C20.88498 (16)0.1437 (2)0.51643 (15)0.0274 (5)
C30.89706 (16)0.1438 (2)0.62776 (15)0.0259 (5)
C40.99324 (15)0.2298 (2)0.69505 (14)0.0232 (5)
C51.06929 (16)0.3034 (2)0.65361 (15)0.0267 (5)
C61.05442 (17)0.3056 (2)0.54165 (16)0.0284 (5)
C70.9473 (2)0.2204 (3)0.36334 (16)0.0399 (6)
H7A0.90640.12540.33320.060*
H7B1.02290.22150.35250.060*
H7C0.90500.31440.33310.060*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0323 (8)0.0499 (10)0.0336 (9)−0.0172 (7)0.0120 (7)0.0003 (7)
O20.0398 (9)0.0616 (12)0.0274 (9)−0.0259 (8)0.0069 (7)−0.0044 (8)
O30.0339 (9)0.0544 (11)0.0309 (9)−0.0219 (7)0.0066 (7)−0.0014 (8)
O40.0416 (9)0.0618 (11)0.0351 (10)−0.0259 (8)0.0146 (7)−0.0008 (8)
C10.0264 (10)0.0320 (12)0.0243 (11)−0.0007 (9)0.0074 (8)−0.0006 (9)
C20.0236 (10)0.0315 (12)0.0259 (12)−0.0045 (9)0.0047 (8)−0.0013 (9)
C30.0227 (10)0.0269 (11)0.0286 (12)0.0003 (8)0.0080 (8)0.0034 (8)
C40.0223 (10)0.0247 (11)0.0227 (11)0.0019 (8)0.0064 (8)0.0009 (8)
C50.0220 (10)0.0289 (11)0.0274 (12)−0.0033 (8)0.0040 (8)−0.0019 (9)
C60.0260 (11)0.0299 (12)0.0313 (12)−0.0024 (9)0.0112 (9)0.0018 (9)
C70.0424 (13)0.0499 (15)0.0291 (13)−0.0063 (11)0.0125 (10)−0.0024 (11)
O1—C31.223 (2)C2—C31.499 (3)
O2—C21.335 (2)C3—C41.452 (3)
O2—H20.8200C4—C51.348 (3)
O3—C51.325 (2)C4—C4i1.476 (4)
O3—H30.8200C5—C61.502 (3)
O4—C61.223 (2)C7—H7A0.9600
C1—C21.344 (3)C7—H7B0.9600
C1—C61.445 (3)C7—H7C0.9600
C1—C71.496 (3)
C2—O2—H2109.5C3—C4—C4i119.81 (18)
C5—O3—H3109.5O3—C5—C4121.01 (18)
C2—C1—C6117.14 (18)O3—C5—C6116.50 (17)
C2—C1—C7123.62 (18)C4—C5—C6122.46 (17)
C6—C1—C7119.24 (18)O4—C6—C1122.71 (19)
O2—C2—C1120.65 (18)O4—C6—C5117.24 (18)
O2—C2—C3115.94 (16)C1—C6—C5120.04 (17)
C1—C2—C3123.41 (17)C1—C7—H7A109.5
O1—C3—C4122.79 (19)C1—C7—H7B109.5
O1—C3—C2117.97 (17)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C4—C3—C2119.23 (17)C1—C7—H7C109.5
C5—C4—C3117.65 (18)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C5—C4—C4i122.51 (19)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O4ii0.822.032.770 (2)150
O3—H3···O1iii0.822.032.7658 (19)150
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O4i0.822.032.770 (2)150
O3—H3⋯O1ii0.822.032.7658 (19)150

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  2 in total

1.  PRODUCTION OF OOSPOREIN AND ITS LEUCO FORM BY BASIDIOMYCETE SPECIES.

Authors:  H TAKESHITA; M ANCHEL
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  2 in total
  4 in total

1.  Fungal biosynthesis of the bibenzoquinone oosporein to evade insect immunity.

Authors:  Peng Feng; Yanfang Shang; Kai Cen; Chengshu Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The secondary metabolites from Beauveria bassiana PQ2 inhibit the growth and spore germination of Gibberella moniliformis LIA.

Authors:  José Guadalupe Ávila-Hernández; Pedro Aguilar-Zárate; María Luisa Carrillo-Inungaray; Mariela R Michel; Jorge Enrique Wong-Paz; Diana Beatriz Muñiz-Márquez; Romeo Rojas-Molina; Juan Alberto Ascacio-Valdés; Guillermo Cristian G Martínez-Ávila
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.476

3.  Root-endophytic Chaetomium cupreum chemically enhances aluminium tolerance in Miscanthus sinensis via increasing the aluminium detoxicants, chlorogenic acid and oosporein.

Authors:  Toshikatsu Haruma; Keiko Yamaji; Kazuyoshi Ogawa; Hayato Masuya; Yurina Sekine; Naofumi Kozai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cytotoxic effects of oosporein isolated from endophytic fungus Cochliobolus kusanoi.

Authors:  Alurappa Ramesha; M Venkataramana; Dhamodaran Nirmaladevi; Vijai K Gupta; S Chandranayaka; Chowdappa Srinivas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.