Literature DB >> 22606162

1,4-Phenyl-enebis(methyl-ene) dicarbamate.

Zhi Li1.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(10)H(12)N(2)O(4), is a phenyl dicarbamate with crystallographically imposed inversion symmetry. The dihedral angle between the carbamo-yloxy plane [i.e. the plane of the N-C(O)-O fragment; r.m.s. deviation = 0.002 (3) Å] and the plane of the aryl ring is 29.2 (1)°. In the crystal, two different centrosymmetric N-H⋯O hydrogen-bond inter-actions are observed; these are described as R(2) (2)(8) and R(2) (4)(8) in graph-set notation. The rings form an alternating sequence, linking the mol-ecules into a sheet structure parallel to (011).

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22606162      PMCID: PMC3344159          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812012718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For self-assembled monolayers of alkyl carbamate and alkyl dicarbamate, see: Kim et al. (2003 ▶); Kim et al. (2005a ▶,b ▶). For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Takeuchi et al. (1971 ▶, 1974 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H12N2O4 M = 224.22 Triclinic, a = 4.9542 (14) Å b = 6.4194 (18) Å c = 8.418 (2) Å α = 79.290 (4)° β = 79.351 (4)° γ = 88.640 (4)° V = 258.50 (13) Å3 Z = 1 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 294 K 0.30 × 0.28 × 0.22 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.962, T max = 0.975 1310 measured reflections 902 independent reflections 764 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.038 wR(F 2) = 0.100 S = 1.06 902 reflections 81 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.15 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: Mercury and SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812012718/nk2147sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812012718/nk2147Isup3.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812012718/nk2147Isup4.cdx Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812012718/nk2147Isup4.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H12N2O4Z = 1
Mr = 224.22F(000) = 118
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.440 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Melting point: 485 K
a = 4.9542 (14) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 6.4194 (18) ÅCell parameters from 819 reflections
c = 8.418 (2) Åθ = 2.5–26.1°
α = 79.290 (4)°µ = 0.11 mm1
β = 79.351 (4)°T = 294 K
γ = 88.640 (4)°Needle, colourless
V = 258.50 (13) Å30.30 × 0.28 × 0.22 mm
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer902 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube764 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.022
phi and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −4→5
Tmin = 0.962, Tmax = 0.975k = −7→5
1310 measured reflectionsl = −9→9
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.100H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0539P)2 + 0.0526P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
902 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
81 parametersΔρmax = 0.15 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.2931 (2)0.76540 (17)0.12334 (15)0.0498 (4)
O20.5723 (2)0.51407 (16)0.22471 (13)0.0427 (4)
N10.7519 (3)0.7787 (2)0.02862 (18)0.0451 (4)
C10.5223 (3)0.6939 (2)0.12480 (18)0.0361 (4)
C20.3389 (3)0.4099 (2)0.3354 (2)0.0419 (4)
H2A0.19590.38940.27490.050*
H2B0.26610.49630.41620.050*
C30.4273 (3)0.1990 (2)0.41993 (17)0.0348 (4)
C40.6516 (3)0.0921 (2)0.35056 (19)0.0432 (4)
H40.75550.15320.24960.052*
C50.2772 (3)0.1045 (2)0.57031 (19)0.0417 (4)
H50.12620.17410.61890.050*
H1A0.912 (4)0.735 (3)0.053 (2)0.057 (5)*
H1B0.740 (4)0.914 (3)−0.031 (2)0.054 (5)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0332 (7)0.0417 (7)0.0668 (8)0.0023 (5)−0.0147 (5)0.0152 (5)
O20.0355 (6)0.0318 (6)0.0531 (7)0.0018 (4)−0.0082 (5)0.0120 (5)
N10.0345 (8)0.0387 (8)0.0538 (8)0.0008 (6)−0.0088 (6)0.0135 (6)
C10.0359 (8)0.0287 (8)0.0421 (8)0.0007 (6)−0.0127 (6)0.0029 (6)
C20.0373 (9)0.0350 (9)0.0468 (9)0.0009 (6)−0.0043 (7)0.0060 (7)
C30.0364 (8)0.0291 (8)0.0373 (8)−0.0008 (6)−0.0086 (6)−0.0001 (6)
C40.0470 (10)0.0375 (9)0.0368 (8)0.0027 (7)0.0021 (7)0.0042 (6)
C50.0417 (9)0.0348 (8)0.0432 (9)0.0071 (7)−0.0005 (7)−0.0013 (7)
O1—C11.2163 (19)C2—H2B0.9700
O2—C11.3430 (17)C3—C51.383 (2)
O2—C21.4348 (18)C3—C41.386 (2)
N1—C11.331 (2)C4—C5i1.384 (2)
N1—H1A0.88 (2)C4—H40.9300
N1—H1B0.93 (2)C5—C4i1.384 (2)
C2—C31.503 (2)C5—H50.9300
C2—H2A0.9700
C1—O2—C2116.37 (12)C3—C2—H2B109.9
C1—N1—H1A119.3 (12)H2A—C2—H2B108.3
C1—N1—H1B116.7 (11)C5—C3—C4118.33 (14)
H1A—N1—H1B118.9 (16)C5—C3—C2119.38 (14)
O1—C1—N1125.38 (14)C4—C3—C2122.27 (14)
O1—C1—O2123.02 (14)C5i—C4—C3120.78 (15)
N1—C1—O2111.59 (13)C5i—C4—H4119.6
O2—C2—C3108.74 (12)C3—C4—H4119.6
O2—C2—H2A109.9C3—C5—C4i120.89 (15)
C3—C2—H2A109.9C3—C5—H5119.6
O2—C2—H2B109.9C4i—C5—H5119.6
C2—O2—C1—O1−1.5 (2)C5—C3—C4—C5i0.2 (3)
C2—O2—C1—N1179.38 (13)C2—C3—C4—C5i−178.21 (15)
C1—O2—C2—C3172.41 (12)C4—C3—C5—C4i−0.2 (3)
O2—C2—C3—C5156.37 (14)C2—C3—C5—C4i178.25 (15)
O2—C2—C3—C4−25.2 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1ii0.88 (2)2.11 (2)2.930 (2)155.6 (17)
N1—H1B···O1iii0.93 (2)2.07 (2)2.9888 (19)169.8 (16)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1i0.88 (2)2.11 (2)2.930 (2)155.6 (17)
N1—H1B⋯O1ii0.93 (2)2.07 (2)2.9888 (19)169.8 (16)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Structure of and competitive adsorption in alkyl dicarbamate two-dimensional crystals.

Authors:  Kibum Kim; Katherine E Plass; Adam J Matzger
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Conformational pseudopolymorphism and orientational disorder in two-dimensional alkyl carbamate crystals.

Authors:  Kibum Kim; Katherine E Plass; Adam J Matzger
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 3.882

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.