Literature DB >> 22606104

Bis(adamantan-1-aminium) carbonate.

Monika Nowakowska1, Caryn Gamble, Demetrius C Levendis.   

Abstract

In the title compound, 2C(10)H(18)N(+)·CO(3) (2-), the adamantan-1-aminium cation forms three N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds to three carbonate ions, resulting in a layer parallel to (001) with the adamantane groups located on its surface so that adjacent layers form only C-H⋯H-C contacts. The carbonate anions occupy special positions of 32 symmetry, whereas the adamantan-1-aminium cations occupy special positions of 3 symmetry.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22606104      PMCID: PMC3344101          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812011828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: de Vries et al. (2011 ▶); Mullica et al. (1999 ▶); He & Wen (2006 ▶); Liu et al. (2009 ▶); Zhao et al. (2003 ▶). For applications of adamantaneammonium salts in virology, see: Hoffmann (1973 ▶); Dolin et al. (1982 ▶); Bright et al. (2005 ▶); Betakova (2007 ▶). For applications of amines for the capture of CO2 from the atmosphere, see: Yang et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

2C10H18NCO3 2− M = 364.52 Trigonal, a = 6.4340 (6) Å c = 25.474 (2) Å V = 913.25 (14) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 173 K 0.30 × 0.22 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 3187 measured reflections 629 independent reflections 493 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.062

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.042 wR(F 2) = 0.107 S = 1.08 629 reflections 45 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.22 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2005 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus and XPREP (Bruker 2005 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶) and PLATON. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812011828/gk2467sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812011828/gk2467Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812011828/gk2467Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
2C10H18N+·CO32Dx = 1.326 Mg m3
Mr = 364.52Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å
Trigonal, P3c1Cell parameters from 819 reflections
Hall symbol: -P 3 2"cθ = 3.2–25.8°
a = 6.4340 (6) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 25.474 (2) ÅT = 173 K
V = 913.25 (14) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 20.30 × 0.22 × 0.08 mm
F(000) = 400
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometerRint = 0.062
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 1.6°
φ and ω scansh = −8→5
3187 measured reflectionsk = −2→8
629 independent reflectionsl = −31→31
493 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.107H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0587P)2 + 0.010P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
629 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
45 parametersΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.18 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.66670.33330.16486 (9)0.0236 (6)
C20.9213 (2)0.5034 (2)0.14518 (6)0.0278 (4)
H2A1.0320.45050.15840.033*
H2B0.9770.66780.15830.033*
C30.9215 (2)0.5033 (3)0.08498 (6)0.0309 (4)
H31.08770.6140.07190.037*
C40.8365 (3)0.2482 (3)0.06502 (6)0.0346 (4)
H4A0.8380.24740.02620.042*
H4B0.94640.19320.07770.042*
C5000.250.0219 (7)
N10.66670.33330.22372 (8)0.0278 (5)
O100.1993 (2)0.250.0343 (4)
H10.732 (4)0.502 (3)0.2358 (7)0.060 (5)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0198 (8)0.0198 (8)0.0312 (12)0.0099 (4)00
C20.0195 (8)0.0205 (7)0.0415 (9)0.0087 (6)−0.0018 (6)−0.0014 (6)
C30.0217 (8)0.0262 (8)0.0404 (9)0.0085 (6)0.0061 (6)0.0039 (6)
C40.0317 (9)0.0350 (9)0.0397 (8)0.0185 (8)0.0055 (6)−0.0016 (7)
C50.0214 (10)0.0214 (10)0.0228 (15)0.0107 (5)00
N10.0253 (7)0.0253 (7)0.0328 (11)0.0127 (3)00
O10.0299 (8)0.0221 (6)0.0536 (10)0.0149 (4)−0.0091 (7)−0.0045 (3)
C1—N11.500 (3)C3—C41.534 (2)
C1—C21.5295 (14)C3—H31
C2—C31.5335 (19)C4—H4A0.99
C2—H2A0.99C4—H4B0.99
C2—H2B0.99C5—O11.2820 (13)
C3—C4i1.532 (2)N1—H10.999 (16)
N1—C1—C2109.13 (9)C2—C3—C4109.40 (12)
C2ii—C1—C2109.81 (9)C2—C3—H3109.5
C1—C2—C3109.18 (12)C4—C3—H3109.5
C1—C2—H2A109.8C3ii—C4—C3109.57 (13)
C3—C2—H2A109.8C3—C4—H4A109.8
C1—C2—H2B109.8C3—C4—H4B109.8
C3—C2—H2B109.8H4A—C4—H4B108.2
H2A—C2—H2B108.3O1iii—C5—O1120
C4i—C3—C2109.29 (11)C1—N1—H1107.9 (11)
C4i—C3—C4109.58 (14)
N1—C1—C2—C3179.92 (8)C1—C2—C3—C4−59.84 (12)
C2ii—C1—C2—C360.34 (13)C4i—C3—C4—C3ii−59.76 (18)
C2i—C1—C2—C3−60.50 (13)C2—C3—C4—C3ii60.04 (15)
C1—C2—C3—C4i60.13 (13)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1iv0.999 (16)1.778 (15)2.7644 (11)168.7 (18)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O1i0.999 (16)1.778 (15)2.764 (1)168.7 (18)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  7 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  A controlled trial of amantadine and rimantadine in the prophylaxis of influenza A infection.

Authors:  R Dolin; R C Reichman; H P Madore; R Maynard; P N Linton; J Webber-Jones
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Incidence of adamantane resistance among influenza A (H3N2) viruses isolated worldwide from 1994 to 2005: a cause for concern.

Authors:  Rick A Bright; Marie-jo Medina; Xiyan Xu; Gilda Perez-Oronoz; Teresa R Wallis; Xiaohong M Davis; Laura Povinelli; Nancy J Cox; Alexander I Klimov
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: a review.

Authors:  Hongqun Yang; Zhenghe Xu; Maohong Fan; Rajender Gupta; Rachid B Slimane; Alan E Bland; Ian Wright
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.565

Review 5.  M2 protein-a proton channel of influenza A virus.

Authors:  Tatiana Betakova
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.116

6.  Adamantane-1-ammonium acetate.

Authors:  Elise J C de Vries; Caryn Gamble; Monika Nowakowska
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-05-07

7.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.