Literature DB >> 22595687

Aging memories: differential decay of episodic memory components.

Lucia M Talamini1, Eva Gorree.   

Abstract

Some memories about events can persist for decades, even a lifetime. However, recent memories incorporate rich sensory information, including knowledge on the spatial and temporal ordering of event features, while old memories typically lack this "filmic" quality. We suggest that this apparent change in the nature of memories may reflect a preferential loss of hippocampus-dependent, configurational information over more cortically based memory components, including memory for individual objects. The current study systematically tests this hypothesis, using a new paradigm that allows the contemporaneous assessment of memory for objects, object pairings, and object-position conjunctions. Retention of each memory component was tested, at multiple intervals, up to 3 mo following encoding. The three memory subtasks adopted the same retrieval paradigm and were matched for initial difficulty. Results show differential decay of the tested episodic memory components, whereby memory for configurational aspects of a scene (objects' co-occurrence and object position) decays faster than memory for featured objects. Interestingly, memory requiring a visually detailed object representation decays at a similar rate as global object recognition, arguing against interpretations based on task difficulty and against the notion that (visual) detail is forgotten preferentially. These findings show that memories undergo qualitative changes as they age. More specifically, event memories become less configurational over time, preferentially losing some of the higher order associations that are dependent on the hippocampus for initial fast encoding. Implications for theories of long-term memory are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22595687     DOI: 10.1101/lm.024281.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  9 in total

1.  Extinction of remotely acquired fear depends on an inhibitory NR2B/PKA pathway in the retrosplenial cortex.

Authors:  Kevin A Corcoran; Katherine Leaderbrand; Jelena Radulovic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Rodent age-related impairments in discriminating perceptually similar objects parallel those observed in humans.

Authors:  Sarah A Johnson; Sean M Turner; Lindsay A Santacroce; Katelyn N Carty; Leila Shafiq; Jennifer L Bizon; Andrew P Maurer; Sara N Burke
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Compulsory volunteers' nostalgia and its relationships with positive memories, age, past experiences, and volunteer intention.

Authors:  Heetae Cho; Dongoh Joo
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-06-07

4.  Effects of learning experience on forgetting rates of item and associative memories.

Authors:  Jiongjiong Yang; Lexia Zhan; Yingying Wang; Xiaoya Du; Wenxi Zhou; Xueling Ning; Qing Sun; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Subjective feeling of re-experiencing past events using immersive virtual reality prevents a loss of episodic memory.

Authors:  Lucie Bréchet; Sebastien B Hausmann; Robin Mange; Bruno Herbelin; Olaf Blanke; Andrea Serino
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Mental representation and episodic-like memory of own actions in dogs.

Authors:  Claudia Fugazza; Péter Pongrácz; Ákos Pogány; Rita Lenkei; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  First-person view of one's body in immersive virtual reality: Influence on episodic memory.

Authors:  Lucie Bréchet; Robin Mange; Bruno Herbelin; Quentin Theillaud; Baptiste Gauthier; Andrea Serino; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Time, not sleep, unbinds contexts from item memory.

Authors:  Roy Cox; Ron R Tijdens; Martijn M Meeter; Carly C G Sweegers; Lucia M Talamini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mental Schemas Hamper Memory Storage of Goal-Irrelevant Information.

Authors:  C C G Sweegers; G A Coleman; E A M van Poppel; R Cox; L M Talamini
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.