Literature DB >> 22595310

Visual cortex responses to suprachoroidal electrical stimulation of the retina: effects of electrode return configuration.

Rosemary Cicione1, Mohit N Shivdasani, James B Fallon, Chi D Luu, Penny J Allen, Graeme D Rathbone, Robert K Shepherd, Chris E Williams.   

Abstract

A clinically effective retinal prosthesis must evoke localized phosphenes in a retinotopic manner in response to stimulation of each of the retinal electrodes, evoke brightness cues over a wide dynamic range and function within safe stimulus limits. The effects of varying return configuration for retinal stimulation are currently unknown. To investigate this, we implanted a flexible, 7 × 12 electrode array into the suprachoroidal space of normally-sighted, anesthetized cats. Multi-unit activity in the primary visual cortex was recorded in response to electrical stimulation using various return configurations: monopolar vitreous (MPV), common ground (CG), hexagonal (HX), monopolar remote (MPR) and bipolar (BP_N). MPV stimulation was found to be the most charge efficient and was most likely to induce cortical activity within safe charge limits. HX and CG stimulation were found to exhibit greater retinal selectivity compared to the MPV return at the expense of lower cortical yield and higher P50 charge levels, while cortical selectivity was unaffected by choice of return. Responses using MPR and widely spaced BP_N configurations were similar to those using the MPV return. These results suggest that choice of return configuration for a retinal prosthesis will be balanced between resolution and stimulation within safe charge limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22595310     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/3/036009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  20 in total

1.  Properties of electrically evoked potentials activated by optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes of different modes in rabbits.

Authors:  Pengjia Cao; Jingjing Sun; Yan Yan; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Xiaodong Sun; Qiushi Ren; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Implantable neurotechnologies: electrical stimulation and applications.

Authors:  Sudip Nag; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Surgical feasibility and biocompatibility of wide-field dual-array suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation prosthesis in middle-sized animals.

Authors:  Tibor Karl Lohmann; Hiroyuki Kanda; Takeshi Morimoto; Takao Endo; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Kentaro Nishida; Motohiro Kamei; Peter Walter; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Evaluation of electrochemically treated bulk electrodes for a retinal prosthesis by examination of retinal intrinsic signals in cats.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanda; Toshifumi Mihashi; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Yoko Hirohara; Takeshi Morimoto; Yasuo Terasawa; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  neuroBi: A Highly Configurable Neurostimulator for a Retinal Prosthesis and Other Applications.

Authors:  Kyle D Slater; Nicholas C Sinclair; Timothy S Nelson; Peter J Blamey; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.316

6.  Epiretinal stimulation with local returns enhances selectivity at cellular resolution.

Authors:  Victoria H Fan; Lauren E Grosberg; Sasidhar S Madugula; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Spatial characteristics of evoked potentials elicited by a MEMS microelectrode array for suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in a rabbit.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Xiaohong Sui; Wenjia Liu; Yiliang Lu; Pengjia Cao; Zengguang Ma; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Caravaca-Rodriguez; Susana P Gaytan; Gregg J Suaning; Alejandro Barriga-Rivera
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

9.  Inner retinal preservation in rat models of retinal degeneration implanted with subretinal photovoltaic arrays.

Authors:  Jacob G Light; James W Fransen; Adewumi N Adekunle; Alice Adkins; Gobinda Pangeni; James Loudin; Keith Mathieson; Daniel V Palanker; Maureen A McCall; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Optoelectronic Devices for Vision Restoration.

Authors:  Victor Wang; Ajay E Kuriyan
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2020-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.