Literature DB >> 22594958

Patient satisfaction with topical ocular hypotensives.

Nathan M Kerr1, Hussain Y Patel, Shenton Sl Chew, Noor Q Ali, Elizabeth K Eady, Helen V Danesh-Meyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess patient satisfaction, convenience of use, ease of administration, side effects and treatment burden of topical ocular hypotensives.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand five hundred and forty-one patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
METHODS: The Treatment Impact Patient Satisfaction Scale (TIPSS) was administered by mail to all patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension registered with Glaucoma New Zealand during a 3-month study period. The questionnaire assessed patient demographics; topical ocular hypotensive use including number of medications, frequency of administration, ease of use, class of medication, and presence/severity of side effects; impact on quality of life; and patient satisfaction. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify determinants of patient satisfaction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: Almost 80% of respondents were either 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with topical ocular hypotensives. Factors that were predictive of patient satisfaction included satisfaction with frequency of eye drop use {odds ratio (OR) 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-3.1); P < 0.001}, subjective convenience (OR 2.6 [95% CI 2.0-3.4]; P < 0.001) and ease of administration (OR 2.5 [95% CI 2.0-3.3]; P < 0.001). Male gender was associated with lower satisfaction (OR 0.6 [95% CI 0.5-0.9]; P = 0.01). Factors that were not predictive of patient satisfaction included age, duration of eye drop use, class of medication and the presence of side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with glaucoma and ocular hypotension are satisfied with topical ocular hypotensives. Efforts to improve patient satisfaction should focus on convenience and ease of administration.
© 2012 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2012 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22594958     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02823.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  5 in total

Review 1.  Living with, managing and minimising treatment burden in long term conditions: a systematic review of qualitative research.

Authors:  Sara Demain; Ana-Carolina Gonçalves; Carlos Areia; Rúben Oliveira; Ana Jorge Marcos; Alda Marques; Ranj Parmar; Katherine Hunt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Patient satisfaction with glaucoma therapy: reality or myth?

Authors:  Hans G Lemij; Juliette Gmm Hoevenaars; Cees van der Windt; Christophe Baudouin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-04

3.  Patient satisfaction with fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution: a survey study in patients with glaucoma in China.

Authors:  Xinghuai Sun; Mingkai Lin; Xuanchu Duan; Chun Zhang; Jian Ming
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 4.  Preservatives in glaucoma medication.

Authors:  David W Steven; Pouya Alaghband; Kin Sheng Lim
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Areas and factors associated with patients' dissatisfaction with glaucoma care.

Authors:  Valencia Hui Xian Foo; Sarah En Mei Tan; David Ziyou Chen; Shamira A Perera; Charumathi Sabayanagam; Eva Katie Fenwick; Tina T Wong; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.