Literature DB >> 22593497

Parenteral nutrition support for patients with pancreatic cancer--improvement of the nutritional status and the therapeutic outcome.

Eva Richter1, Almut Denecke, Silke Klapdor, Rainer Klapdor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is a frequent and serious problem of patients with pancreatic cancer (i.e. due to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, postoperative syndromes, anorexia, chemotherapy, and/or tumor progression). In many cases it has negative effects on the quality of life or on the tumor therapy. We investigated if malnutrition can be resolved or corrected by adequate home parenteral nutrition (PN) of pancreatic cancer (PaCa) patients, in cases where dietary advice and oral nutrition supplementation failed to correct the deficiencies. The energy supply via PN was analyzed in patients with PaCa, with focus on the single components in compounded PN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined a group of six women and eleven men with assured PaCa disease at different tumor stages (mean age: 64 years). Indications for PN were a reduction of body weight of >5 % in three months and/or a long-term reduced nutritional status, reduced results of the bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA), malassimilation and/or clinical symptoms like severe diarrhoea/vomitus, preventing adequate oral nutrition for weeks. The PN, administered via port-catheter, was initiated while the patients were undergoing chemotherapy. The course of treatment was assessed based on body weight, BIA (Data-Input Nutriguard-M), on laboratory parameters and on personal evaluation of the patients' quality of life. Retrospectively, the patients were subdivided into two groups (Gr): Gr1 (n=10) had a survival period of more than 5, up to more than 37 months, after the start of PN and Gr2 (n=7) had a survival between 1-4 months after start of PN. The calculations of the energy supply were based on the patients' body weight (per kg). Fluid volume, relation of macronutrients and addition of fish oil to PN are described in detail.
RESULTS: Gr1: Eight of ten patients already showed an increase of body weight with the initial PN, two patients after dose adaption. This positive impact was also observable on the cellular level by means of BIA results (phase angle, body cell mass (BCM), extracellular mass (ECM), cell content and ECM/BCM Index). Two patients, who were receiving PN for over two or three periods, showed reproducibility of the results; while when PN was interrupted all BIA parameters degraded and they ameliorated with the restart of PN. Gr2: In these patients PN was started in the late stage of the tumor disease in order to allow for a--from the retrospective point of view--last, but ineffective chemotherapy. The data indicated that the weight loss could be retarded, even if the effects on body weight and BIA parameters were found to be less pronounced compared to Gr1. The mean energy supply of both groups, however, was similar: 8,823 kcal (Gr1) per week compared to 9,572 kcal (Gr2) per week. The majority of patients claimed to be quicker and more powerful under PN and to some extent the appetite was enhanced.
CONCLUSION: A timely onset of PN with sufficient calories leads to an improved nutritional status of patients with PaCa disease. PN enhances the quality of life, the administration of tumor therapy without interruption and therefore may lead to a better success of the entire therapy. For late-stage tumor patients (Gr2) the quality of life can, at least, be improved. The success of PN is significantly dependent upon the patients' compliance, which could be achieved through intensive consulting and support of all patients and their relatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22593497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  23 in total

1.  Cancer-treatment toxicity: can nutrition help?

Authors:  Alessandro Laviano; Alessio Molfino; Filippo Rossi Fanelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Nutrition in Patients with Gastric Cancer: An Update.

Authors:  Rosa Rosania; Costanza Chiapponi; Peter Malfertheiner; Marino Venerito
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2016-04-13

Review 3.  Nutrition in Pancreatic Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Simone Gärtner; Janine Krüger; Ali A Aghdassi; Antje Steveling; Peter Simon; Markus M Lerch; Julia Mayerle
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2016-01-08

Review 4.  Sarcopenia in gastric cancer: when the loss costs too much.

Authors:  Elena Ongaro; Vanessa Buoro; Marika Cinausero; Riccardo Caccialanza; Annalisa Turri; Valentina Fanotto; Debora Basile; Maria Grazia Vitale; Paola Ermacora; Giovanni Gerardo Cardellino; Laura Nicoletti; Lorenzo Fornaro; Andrea Casadei-Gardini; Giuseppe Aprile
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Stool Elastase as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients with Pancreatic Head Cancer.

Authors:  Honam Hwang; Hongbeom Kim; Hee Ju Sohn; Mirang Lee; Hyeong Seok Kim; Youngmin Han; Wooil Kwon; Jin-Young Jang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in adults: a shared position statement of the Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas.

Authors:  Raffaele Pezzilli; Angelo Andriulli; Claudio Bassi; Gianpaolo Balzano; Maurizio Cantore; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  A longitudinal study investigating quality of life and nutritional outcomes in advanced cancer patients receiving home parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  Pankaj G Vashi; Sadie Dahlk; Brenten Popiel; Carolyn A Lammersfeld; Carol Ireton-Jones; Digant Gupta
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Prognostic nutritional index serves as a predictive marker of survival and associates with systemic inflammatory response in metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chenyue Zhang; Haiyong Wang; Zhouyu Ning; Litao Xu; Liping Zhuang; Peng Wang; Zhiqiang Meng
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Friend or foe? Feeding tube placement at the time of pancreatoduodenectomy: propensity score case-matched analysis.

Authors:  Mazhar Soufi; Mohammed Al-Temimi; Trang K Nguyen; Michael G House; Nicholas J Zyromski; C Max Schmidt; Attila Nakeeb; Eugene P Ceppa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Phase angle and handgrip strength are sensitive early markers of energy intake in hypophagic, non-surgical patients at nutritional risk, with contraindications to enteral nutrition.

Authors:  Riccardo Caccialanza; Emanuele Cereda; Catherine Klersy; Chiara Bonardi; Silvia Cappello; Lara Quarleri; Annalisa Turri; Elisabetta Montagna; Isabella Iacona; Francesco Valentino; Paolo Pedrazzoli
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.