Literature DB >> 22593242

Distinct representations of attentional control during voluntary and stimulus-driven shifts across objects and locations.

Christian Michael Stoppel1, Carsten Nicolas Boehler, Hendrik Strumpf, Ruth Marie Krebs, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Jens-Max Hopf, Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld.   

Abstract

Efficient interaction with the sensory environment requires the rapid reallocation of attentional resources between spatial locations, perceptual features, and objects. It is still a matter of debate whether one single domain-general network or multiple independent domain-specific networks mediate control during shifts of attention across features, locations, and objects. Here, we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging to directly compare the neural mechanisms controlling attention during voluntary and stimulus-driven shifts across objects and locations. Subjects either maintained or switched voluntarily and involuntarily their attention to objects located at the same or at a different visual location. Our data demonstrate shift-related activity in multiple frontoparietal, extrastriate visual, and default-mode network regions, several of which were commonly recruited by voluntary and stimulus-driven shifts between objects and locations. However, our results also revealed object- and location-selective activations, which, moreover, differed substantially between voluntary and stimulus-driven attention. These results suggest that voluntary and stimulus-driven shifts between objects and locations recruit partially overlapping, but also separable, cortical regions, implicating the parallel existence of domain-independent and domain-specific reconfiguration signals that initiate attention shifts in dependence of particular demands.

Keywords:  attention; fMRI; object-based; spatial; stimulus-driven; voluntary

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22593242     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  6 in total

1.  Dancers and fastball sports athletes have different spatial visual attention styles.

Authors:  Ummuhan Isoglu-Alkac; M Numan Ermutlu; Gökçer Eskikurt; İlker Yücesir; Sernaz Demirel Temel; Tan Temel
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  The Effects of Useful Field of View Training on Brain Activity and Connectivity.

Authors:  Lesley A Ross; Christina E Webb; Christine Whitaker; Jarrod M Hicks; Erica L Schmidt; Shaadee Samimy; Nancy A Dennis; Kristina M Visscher
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Out with the Old and in with the New: the Contribution of Prefrontal and Cerebellar Areas to Backward Inhibition.

Authors:  Silvia Picazio; Francesca Foti; Massimiliano Oliveri; Giacomo Koch; Laura Petrosini; Fabio Ferlazzo; Stefano Sdoia
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Stimulus-Driven Reorienting Impairs Executive Control of Attention: Evidence for a Common Bottleneck in Anterior Insula.

Authors:  Fynn-Mathis Trautwein; Tania Singer; Philipp Kanske
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Differences and Similarities for Spatial and Feature-Based Selective Attentional Orienting.

Authors:  Daniela Galashan; Julia Siemann
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Out with the Old and in with the New--Is Backward Inhibition a Domain-Specific Process?

Authors:  Francesca Foti; Stefano Sdoia; Deny Menghini; Stefano Vicari; Laura Petrosini; Fabio Ferlazzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.