OBJECTIVE: To determine whether exposure to repetitive head impacts over a single season negatively affects cognitive performance in collegiate contact sport athletes. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study at 3 Division I National Collegiate Athletic Association athletic programs. Participants were 214 Division I college varsity football and ice hockey players who wore instrumented helmets that recorded the acceleration-time history of the head following impact, and 45 noncontact sport athletes. All athletes were assessed prior to and shortly after the season with a cognitive screening battery (ImPACT) and a subgroup of athletes also were assessed with 7 measures from a neuropsychological test battery. RESULTS: Few cognitive differences were found between the athlete groups at the preseason or postseason assessments. However, a higher percentage of the contact sport athletes performed more poorly than predicted postseason on a measure of new learning (California Verbal Learning Test) compared to the noncontact athletes (24% vs 3.6%; p < 0.006). On 2 postseason cognitive measures (ImPACT Reaction Time and Trails 4/B), poorer performance was significantly associated with higher scores on several head impact exposure metrics. CONCLUSION: Repetitive head impacts over the course of a single season may negatively impact learning in some collegiate athletes. Further work is needed to assess whether such effects are short term or persistent.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether exposure to repetitive head impacts over a single season negatively affects cognitive performance in collegiate contact sport athletes. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study at 3 Division I National Collegiate Athletic Association athletic programs. Participants were 214 Division I college varsity football and ice hockey players who wore instrumented helmets that recorded the acceleration-time history of the head following impact, and 45 noncontact sport athletes. All athletes were assessed prior to and shortly after the season with a cognitive screening battery (ImPACT) and a subgroup of athletes also were assessed with 7 measures from a neuropsychological test battery. RESULTS: Few cognitive differences were found between the athlete groups at the preseason or postseason assessments. However, a higher percentage of the contact sport athletes performed more poorly than predicted postseason on a measure of new learning (California Verbal Learning Test) compared to the noncontact athletes (24% vs 3.6%; p < 0.006). On 2 postseason cognitive measures (ImPACT Reaction Time and Trails 4/B), poorer performance was significantly associated with higher scores on several head impact exposure metrics. CONCLUSION: Repetitive head impacts over the course of a single season may negatively impact learning in some collegiate athletes. Further work is needed to assess whether such effects are short term or persistent.
Authors: T W McAllister; A J Saykin; L A Flashman; M B Sparling; S C Johnson; S J Guerin; A C Mamourian; J B Weaver; N Yanofsky Journal: Neurology Date: 1999-10-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stefan M Duma; Sarah J Manoogian; William R Bussone; P Gunnar Brolinson; Mike W Goforth; Jesse J Donnenwerth; Richard M Greenwald; Jeffrey J Chu; Joseph J Crisco Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Michael McCrea; William B Barr; Kevin Guskiewicz; Christopher Randolph; Stephen W Marshall; Robert Cantu; James A Onate; James P Kelly Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Thomas M Talavage; Eric A Nauman; Evan L Breedlove; Umit Yoruk; Anne E Dye; Katherine E Morigaki; Henry Feuer; Larry J Leverenz Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Michael McCrea; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Stephen W Marshall; William Barr; Christopher Randolph; Robert C Cantu; James A Onate; Jingzhen Yang; James P Kelly Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-11-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: William T Tsushima; Hyeong Jun Ahn; Andrea M Siu; Tama Fukuyama; Nathan M Murata Journal: Appl Neuropsychol Child Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 1.493
Authors: Walter F Stewart; Namhee Kim; Chloe S Ifrah; Richard B Lipton; Tamar A Bachrach; Molly E Zimmerman; Mimi Kim; Michael L Lipton Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Thomas W McAllister; James C Ford; Laura A Flashman; Arthur Maerlender; Richard M Greenwald; Jonathan G Beckwith; Richard P Bolander; Tor D Tosteson; John H Turco; Rema Raman; Sonia Jain Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Inga K Koerte; Alexander P Lin; Anna Willems; Marc Muehlmann; Jakob Hufschmidt; Michael J Coleman; Isobel Green; Huijun Liao; David F Tate; Elisabeth A Wilde; Ofer Pasternak; Sylvain Bouix; Yogesh Rathi; Erin D Bigler; Robert A Stern; Martha E Shenton Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 6.508
Authors: Anthony L Petraglia; Benjamin A Plog; Samantha Dayawansa; Michael Chen; Matthew L Dashnaw; Katarzyna Czerniecka; Corey T Walker; Tyler Viterise; Ollivier Hyrien; Jeffrey J Iliff; Rashid Deane; Maiken Nedergaard; Jason H Huang Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: William P Meehan; Alex M Taylor; Paul Berkner; Noah J Sandstrom; Mark W Peluso; Matthew M Kurtz; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Rebekah Mannix Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Ann-Christine Duhaime; Jonathan G Beckwith; Arthur C Maerlender; Thomas W McAllister; Joseph J Crisco; Stefan M Duma; P Gunnar Brolinson; Steven Rowson; Laura A Flashman; Jeffrey J Chu; Richard M Greenwald Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 5.115