Literature DB >> 22592328

Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of cranial base chordomas: outcomes and learning curve.

Maria Koutourousiou1, Paul A Gardner, Matthew J Tormenti, Stephanie L Henry, Susan T Stefko, Amin B Kassam, Juan C Fernandez-Miranda, Carl H Snyderman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gross total resection (GTR) of cranial base chordomas represents a surgical challenge because of the location, invasiveness, and tumor extension. In the past decade, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been used with notable outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To present the endoscopic endonasal experience in the treatment of cranial base chordomas at our institution.
METHODS: From April 2003 to March 2011, 60 patients underwent an EEA for primary (n = 35) or previously treated (n = 25) cranial base chordomas. We evaluated the degree of GTR and complications. We studied the factors that influenced outcomes and compared our surgical results in the early and late years of our experience.
RESULTS: The overall rate of GTR of cranial base chordomas was 66.7% (82.9% in primary and 44% in previously treated patients). The most important limitations for GTR were tumor volume greater than 20 cm (P = .042), tumor location in the lower clivus with lateral extension (P = .022), and previously treated disease (P = .002). The learning curve had a significant impact on GTR, increasing the success rate to 88.9% (92.6% in primary patients and 63.6% in previously treated patients) during recent years (P < .0001). The most frequent complication was cerebrospinal fluid leak (20%) resulting in meningitis in 3.3%. Carotid injuries occurred in 2 patients without any resulting deficit. Neurological complications included new cranial neuropathies (6.7%) and long tract deficits (1.7%). There was no operative mortality in our series.
CONCLUSION: For the treatment of cranial base chordomas, the EEA is a competitive alternative to transcranial approaches with minimal morbidity and high success rates of GTR when performed by experienced cranial base surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22592328     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31825ea3e0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  45 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on rhino-neurosurgery.

Authors:  Werner Hosemann; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Classification and surgical approaches for transnasal endoscopic skull base chordoma resection: a 6-year experience with 161 cases.

Authors:  Songbai Gui; Xuyi Zong; Xinsheng Wang; Chuzhong Li; Peng Zhao; Lei Cao; Yazhuo Zhang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  A Staged Strategy for Craniocervical Junction Chordoma with Combination of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach and Far Lateral Approach with Endoscopic Assistance: Case Report.

Authors:  Shunya Hanakita; Moujahed Labidi; Kentaro Watanabe; Sebastien Froelich
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-07-16

4.  MR imaging evolution of endoscopic cranial defect reconstructions using nasoseptal flaps and their distinction from neoplasm.

Authors:  K O Learned; N D Adappa; J Y K Lee; J G Newman; J N Palmer; L A Loevner
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery: pushing the boundaries.

Authors:  Nathan T Zwagerman; Georgios Zenonos; Stefan Lieber; Wei-Hsin Wang; Eric W Wang; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Carl H Snyderman; Paul A Gardner
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Simulating Internal Carotid Artery Injury during Transsphenoidal Transclival Endoscopic Surgery in a Perfused Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Tristan P C van Doormaal; Sander J H Diederen; Albert van der Zwan; Jan Willem Berkelbach; Arvid Kropveld; Paul R A M Depauw
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-08-23

7.  Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approach to resection of olfactory groove meningiomas: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aarti Purohit; Roshani Jha; Adham M Khalafallah; Carrie Price; Nicholas R Rowan; Debraj Mukherjee
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Endoscopic endonasal resection of clival xanthoma: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Laura González-García; Beatriz Asenjo-García; María Dolores Bautista-Ojeda; Miguel Domínguez-Páez; Lorena Romero-Moreno; Álvaro Martín-Gallego; Miguel Ángel Arráez-Sánchez
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 9.  Chondrosarcomas of the head and neck.

Authors:  Andrés Coca-Pelaz; Juan P Rodrigo; Asterios Triantafyllou; Jennifer L Hunt; Juan C Fernández-Miranda; Primož Strojan; Remco de Bree; Alessandra Rinaldo; Robert P Takes; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Endoscopic endonasal transclival approaches: case series and outcomes for different clival regions.

Authors:  Ryan E Little; Robert J Taylor; Justin D Miller; Emily C Ambrose; Anand V Germanwala; Deanna M Sasaki-Adams; Matthew G Ewend; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.