INTRODUCTION: The current study evaluated the signal characteristics of susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) of arteriovenous malformation (AVM), especially for draining veins. For this purpose, we identified the draining veins of the AVM on angiography and evaluated the signal on magnitude image for SWI (SWI-mag) and minimum intensity projection image (SWI-minIP). METHODS: Subjects were 14 cases with angiographically proven AVM. SWI-mag, SWI-minIP, and time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography were acquired. For the draining veins of the AVM identified on angiography, we analyzed signal intensity on the images listed above, and classified it into hyperintensity (hyper), mixed intensity (mixed), hypointensity (hypo), and no visualization. RESULTS: On the analysis of 27 angiographically proven draining veins, 19 draining veins were classified as hyper, 3 as mixed, 0 as hypo, and 6 as no visualization on SWI-mag. On TOF images, 21 draining veins were classified as hyper, 2 as mixed, 0 as hypo, and 4 as no visualization, while 6 draining veins did not show hyperintensity on TOF, and SWI-mag visualized 3 of these 6 veins as hyper. CONCLUSION: SWI-mag depicted most draining veins of AVM as hyperintensity. We speculate that this is mainly due to the higher concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) and inflow effect of the draining vein. SWI-mag seems to be useful in the analysis and follow-up for AVM as the signal on the image may reflect physiological status.
INTRODUCTION: The current study evaluated the signal characteristics of susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) of arteriovenous malformation (AVM), especially for draining veins. For this purpose, we identified the draining veins of the AVM on angiography and evaluated the signal on magnitude image for SWI (SWI-mag) and minimum intensity projection image (SWI-minIP). METHODS: Subjects were 14 cases with angiographically proven AVM. SWI-mag, SWI-minIP, and time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography were acquired. For the draining veins of the AVM identified on angiography, we analyzed signal intensity on the images listed above, and classified it into hyperintensity (hyper), mixed intensity (mixed), hypointensity (hypo), and no visualization. RESULTS: On the analysis of 27 angiographically proven draining veins, 19 draining veins were classified as hyper, 3 as mixed, 0 as hypo, and 6 as no visualization on SWI-mag. On TOF images, 21 draining veins were classified as hyper, 2 as mixed, 0 as hypo, and 4 as no visualization, while 6 draining veins did not show hyperintensity on TOF, and SWI-mag visualized 3 of these 6 veins as hyper. CONCLUSION:SWI-mag depicted most draining veins of AVM as hyperintensity. We speculate that this is mainly due to the higher concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) and inflow effect of the draining vein. SWI-mag seems to be useful in the analysis and follow-up for AVM as the signal on the image may reflect physiological status.
Authors: Vivek Sehgal; Zachary Delproposto; E Mark Haacke; Karen A Tong; Nathaniel Wycliffe; Daniel K Kido; Yingbiao Xu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Djamel Haddar; Jürgen R Reichenbach Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Christian Stapf; Daniel L Labovitz; Robert R Sciacca; Henning Mast; Jay P Mohr; Ralph L Sacco Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Rustam Al-Shahi; Jo J Bhattacharya; David G Currie; Vakis Papanastassiou; Vaughn Ritchie; Richard C Roberts; Robin J Sellar; Charles P Warlow Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-04-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Ichiro Yuki; Robert H Kim; Gary Duckwiler; Reza Jahan; Satoshi Tateshima; Nestor Gonzalez; Alessandra Gorgulho; Jorge Lee Diaz; Antonio A De Salles; Fernando Viñuela Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Robert M Starke; Ricardo J Komotar; Brian Y Hwang; Laura E Fischer; Matthew C Garrett; Marc L Otten; E Sander Connolly Journal: Br J Neurosurg Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 1.596
Authors: C Stapf; H Mast; R R Sciacca; A Berenstein; P K Nelson; Y P Gobin; J Pile-Spellman; J P Mohr Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-04-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Chun-Xue Wu; Li Ma; Xu-Zhu Chen; Xiao-Lin Chen; Yu Chen; Yuan-Li Zhao; Christopher Hess; Helen Kim; Heng-Wei Jin; Jun Ma Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Salil Soman; Jose A Bregni; Berkin Bilgic; Ursula Nemec; Audrey Fan; Zhe Liu; Robert L Barry; Jiang Du; Keith Main; Jerome Yesavage; Maheen M Adamson; Michael Moseley; Yi Wang Journal: Curr Radiol Rep Date: 2017-02-14
Authors: Korbinian Eckstein; Beata Bachrata; Gilbert Hangel; Georg Widhalm; Christian Enzinger; Markus Barth; Siegfried Trattnig; Simon Daniel Robinson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-05-15 Impact factor: 7.400
Authors: Richard Liberio; Emily Kramer; Anza B Memon; Ryan Reinbeau; Parissa Feizi; Joe Joseph; Janet Wu; Shitiz Sriwastava Journal: Neurol Int Date: 2022-08-14