Literature DB >> 22592067

Identifying activity levels and steps of people with stroke using a novel shoe-based sensor.

George D Fulk1, S Ryan Edgar, Rebecca Bierwirth, Phil Hart, Paulo Lopez-Meyer, Edward Sazonov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Advances in sensor technologies provide a method to accurately assess activity levels of people with stroke in their community. This information could be used to determine the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions as well as provide behavior-enhancing feedback. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of a novel shoe-based sensor system (SmartShoe) to identify different functional postures and steps in people with stroke. The SmartShoe system consists of five force-sensitive resistors built into a flexible insole and an accelerometer on the back of the shoe. Pressure and acceleration data are sent via Bluetooth to a smart phone.
METHODS: Participants with stroke wore the SmartShoe while they performed activities of daily living (ADLs) in sitting, standing, and walking positions. Data from four participants were used to develop a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (ANN) to identify sitting, standing, and walking. A signal-processing algorithm used data from the pressure sensors to estimate the number of steps taken while walking. The accuracy, precision, and recall of the ANN for identifying the three functional postures were calculated with data from a different set of participants. Agreement between steps identified by SmartShoe and actual steps taken was analyzed by the Bland Altman method.
RESULTS: The SmartShoe was able to accurately identify sitting, standing, and walking. Accuracy, precision, and recall were all greater than 95%. The mean difference between steps identified by SmartShoe and actual steps was less than one step. DISCUSSION: The SmartShoe was able to accurately identify different functional postures, using a unique combination of pressure and acceleration data, of people with stroke as they performed different ADLs. There was a strong level of agreement between actual steps taken and steps identified by the SmartShoe. Further study is needed to determine whether the SmartShoe could be used to provide valid information on activity levels of people with stroke while they go about their daily lives in their home and community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22592067      PMCID: PMC3355328          DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318256370c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther        ISSN: 1557-0576            Impact factor:   3.649


  35 in total

1.  Estimating clinically important change in gait speed in people with stroke undergoing outpatient rehabilitation.

Authors:  George D Fulk; Miriam Ludwig; Kari Dunning; Sue Golden; Pierce Boyne; Trent West
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 2.  The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Andrew Dorsch
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Microprocessor-based ambulatory activity monitoring in stroke patients.

Authors:  Richard F Macko; Elaina Haeuber; Marianne Shaughnessy; Kim L Coleman; David A Boone; Gerald V Smith; Kenneth H Silver
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Pamela W Duncan; Katherine J Sullivan; Andrea L Behrman; Stanley P Azen; Samuel S Wu; Stephen E Nadeau; Bruce H Dobkin; Dorian K Rose; Julie K Tilson; Steven Cen; Sarah K Hayden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Using sensors to measure activity in people with stroke.

Authors:  George D Fulk; Edward Sazonov
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.119

6.  How much change in the stroke impact scale-16 is important to people who have experienced a stroke?

Authors:  George D Fulk; Miriam Ludwig; Kari Dunning; Sue Golden; Pierce Boyne; Trent West
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.119

7.  Reliability and validity of bilateral thigh and foot accelerometry measures of walking in healthy and hemiparetic subjects.

Authors:  Kaveh Saremi; Jon Marehbian; Xiaohong Yan; Jean-Philippe Regnaux; Robert Elashoff; Bernard Bussel; Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.

Authors:  P W Duncan; D Wallace; S M Lai; D Johnson; S Embretson; L J Laster
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment.

Authors:  M K Holden; K M Gill; M R Magliozzi
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1986-10

10.  Automatic recognition of postures and activities in stroke patients.

Authors:  Edward S Sazonov; George Fulk; Nadezhda Sazonova; Stephanie Schuckers
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning in human movement biomechanics: Best practices, common pitfalls, and new opportunities.

Authors:  Eni Halilaj; Apoorva Rajagopal; Madalina Fiterau; Jennifer L Hicks; Trevor J Hastie; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A Novel Detection Model and Its Optimal Features to Classify Falls from Low- and High-Acceleration Activities of Daily Life Using an Insole Sensor System.

Authors:  Benjamin Cates; Taeyong Sim; Hyun Mu Heo; Bori Kim; Hyunggun Kim; Joung Hwan Mun
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  The known-groups validity of intensity-based physical activity measurement using an accelerometer in people with subacute stroke.

Authors:  Natsuki Shimizu; Hiroyuki Hashidate; Tomohiro Ota; Akihiko Saito
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-04-13

4.  Foot Plantar Pressure Measurement System Using Highly Sensitive Crack-Based Sensor.

Authors:  Jieun Park; Minho Kim; Insic Hong; Taewi Kim; Eunhan Lee; Eun-A Kim; Jae-Kwan Ryu; YongJin Jo; Jeehoon Koo; Seungyong Han; Je-Sung Koh; Daeshik Kang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Evaluation and Application of a Customizable Wireless Platform: A Body Sensor Network for Unobtrusive Gait Analysis in Everyday Life.

Authors:  Markus Lueken; Leo Mueller; Michel G Decker; Cornelius Bollheimer; Steffen Leonhardt; Chuong Ngo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Improving activity recognition using a wearable barometric pressure sensor in mobility-impaired stroke patients.

Authors:  Fabien Massé; Roman R Gonzenbach; Arash Arami; Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu; Andreas R Luft; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Mobile Phone-Connected Wearable Motion Sensors to Assess Postoperative Mobilization.

Authors:  Geoff Appelboom; Blake E Taylor; Eliza Bruce; Clare C Bassile; Corinna Malakidis; Annie Yang; Brett Youngerman; Randy D'Amico; Sam Bruce; Olivier Bruyère; Jean-Yves Reginster; Emmanuel Pl Dumont; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Systematic review on the application of wearable inertial sensors to quantify everyday life motor activity in people with mobility impairments.

Authors:  Fabian Marcel Rast; Rob Labruyère
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.