Literature DB >> 22592061

Robotic assessment of sensorimotor deficits after traumatic brain injury.

Chantel T Debert1, Troy M Herter, Stephen H Scott, Sean Dukelow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Robotic technology is commonly used to quantify aspects of typical sensorimotor function. We evaluated the feasibility of using robotic technology to assess visuomotor and position sense impairments following traumatic brain injury (TBI). We present results of robotic sensorimotor function testing in 12 subjects with TBI, who had a range of initial severities (9 severe, 2 moderate, 1 mild), and contrast these results with those of clinical tests. We also compared these with robotic test outcomes in persons without disability.
METHODS: For each subject with TBI, a review of the initial injury and neuroradiologic findings was conducted. Following this, each subject completed a number of standardized clinical measures (Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Purdue Peg Board, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Rancho Los Amigos Scale), followed by two robotic tasks. A visually guided reaching task was performed to assess visuomotor control of the upper limb. An arm position-matching task was used to assess position sense. Robotic task performance in the subjects with TBI was compared with findings in a cohort of 170 person without disabilities.
RESULTS: Subjects with TBI demonstrated a broad range of sensory and motor deficits on robotic testing. Notably, several subjects with TBI displayed significant deficits in one or both of the robotic tasks, despite normal scores on traditional clinical motor and cognitive assessment measures. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate the potential of robotic assessments for identifying deficits in visuomotor control and position sense following TBI. Improved identification of neurologic impairments following TBI may ultimately enhance rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22592061     DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318254bd4f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther        ISSN: 1557-0576            Impact factor:   3.649


  26 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of post-concussion syndrome following mild traumatic brain injury using robotic technology.

Authors:  Vignesh Subbian; Jason M Meunier; Joseph J Korfhagen; Jonathan J Ratcliff; George J Shaw; Fred R Beyette
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

2.  Using clinical and robotic assessment tools to examine the feasibility of pairing tDCS with upper extremity physical therapy in patients with stroke and TBI: a consideration-of-concept pilot study.

Authors:  Addie Middleton; Stacy L Fritz; Derek M Liuzzo; Roger Newman-Norlund; Troy M Herter
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.138

3.  A Novel Tool for Evaluation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in the Emergency Department: Does Robotic Assessment of Neuromotor Performance Following Injury Predict the Presence of Postconcussion Symptoms at Follow-up?

Authors:  Vignesh Subbian; Jonathan J Ratcliff; Joseph J Korfhagen; Kimberly W Hart; Jason M Meunier; George J Shaw; Christopher J Lindsell; Fred R Beyette
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Corticospinal tract diffusion properties and robotic visually guided reaching in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Andrea M Kuczynski; Sean P Dukelow; Jacquie A Hodge; Helen L Carlson; Catherine Lebel; Jennifer A Semrau; Adam Kirton
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Principal Components Analysis Using Data Collected From Healthy Individuals on Two Robotic Assessment Platforms Yields Similar Behavioral Patterns.

Authors:  Michael D Wood; Leif E R Simmatis; Jill A Jacobson; Sean P Dukelow; J Gordon Boyd; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Relative independence of upper limb position sense and reaching in children with hemiparetic perinatal stroke.

Authors:  Andrea M Kuczynski; Adam Kirton; Jennifer A Semrau; Sean P Dukelow
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Use of a robotic device to measure age-related decline in finger proprioception.

Authors:  Morgan L Ingemanson; Justin B Rowe; Vicky Chan; Eric T Wolbrecht; Steven C Cramer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Disruption in proprioception from long-term thalamic deep brain stimulation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jennifer A Semrau; Troy M Herter; Zelma H Kiss; Sean P Dukelow
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Test-retest reliability of KINARM robot sensorimotor and cognitive assessment: in pediatric ice hockey players.

Authors:  C Elaine Little; Carolyn Emery; Amanda Black; Stephen H Scott; Willem Meeuwisse; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Brian Benson; Sean Dukelow
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Piano training in youths with hand motor impairments after damage to the developing brain.

Authors:  Renée Lampe; Anna Thienel; Jürgen Mitternacht; Tobias Blumenstein; Varvara Turova; Ana Alves-Pinto
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.