BACKGROUND: Visceral hypersensitivity is a frequently observed hallmark of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Studies have reported differently about the presence of visceral hypersensitivity in IBS resulting from lack of standardization of the barostat procedure and due to different criteria used to assess hypersensitivity. We aimed to calculate the optimal cutoff to detect visceral hypersensitivity in IBS. METHODS: A total of 126 IBS patients and 30 healthy controls (HC) were included for assessment of visceroperception by barostat. Pain perception was assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS). ROC-curves were used to calculate optimal discriminative cutoff (pressure and VAS-score) between IBS patients and HC to define hypersensitivity. Furthermore, pain perception to distension sequences below the pressure threshold for hypersensitivity was defined as allodynia. KEY RESULTS: Irritable bowel syndrome patients showed increased visceroperception compared to HC. Thresholds for first sensation and first pain were lower in IBS patients VS HC (P < 0.01). ROC-curves showed optimal discrimination between IBS patients and HC at 26 mmHg with a VAS cutoff ≥20 mm. Using this criterion, hypersensitivity percentages were 63.5% and 6.6% in IBS patients and HC, respectively. No significant differences were observed between IBS subtypes. Allodynia was found in a small number of patients (11%). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Optimal cutoff for visceral hypersensitivity was found at pressure 26 mmHg with a VAS ≥20 mm, resulting in 63.5% of IBS patients being hypersensitive and 11% being allodynic. Standardization of barostat procedures and defining optimal cutoff values for hypersensitivity is warranted when employing rectal barostat measurements for research or clinical purposes.
BACKGROUND: Visceral hypersensitivity is a frequently observed hallmark of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Studies have reported differently about the presence of visceral hypersensitivity inIBS resulting from lack of standardization of the barostat procedure and due to different criteria used to assess hypersensitivity. We aimed to calculate the optimal cutoff to detect visceral hypersensitivity inIBS. METHODS: A total of 126 IBSpatients and 30 healthy controls (HC) were included for assessment of visceroperception by barostat. Pain perception was assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS). ROC-curves were used to calculate optimal discriminative cutoff (pressure and VAS-score) between IBSpatients and HC to define hypersensitivity. Furthermore, pain perception to distension sequences below the pressure threshold for hypersensitivity was defined as allodynia. KEY RESULTS:Irritable bowel syndromepatients showed increased visceroperception compared to HC. Thresholds for first sensation and first pain were lower in IBSpatients VS HC (P < 0.01). ROC-curves showed optimal discrimination between IBSpatients and HC at 26 mmHg with a VAS cutoff ≥20 mm. Using this criterion, hypersensitivity percentages were 63.5% and 6.6% in IBSpatients and HC, respectively. No significant differences were observed between IBS subtypes. Allodynia was found in a small number of patients (11%). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Optimal cutoff for visceral hypersensitivity was found at pressure 26 mmHg with a VAS ≥20 mm, resulting in 63.5% of IBSpatients being hypersensitive and 11% being allodynic. Standardization of barostat procedures and defining optimal cutoff values for hypersensitivity is warranted when employing rectal barostat measurements for research or clinical purposes.
Authors: Kevin M Hellman; Avisek Datta; Nicole D Steiner; Julia N Kane Morlock; Ellen F Garrison; Daniel J Clauw; Frank F Tu Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Thomas Thomaidis; Martin Goetz; Sebastian Paul Gregor; Arthur Hoffman; Elias Kouroumalis; Markus Moehler; Peter Robert Galle; Andreas Schwarting; Ralf Kiesslich Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Zhi S Li; Lin Y Hung; Kara G Margolis; Richard T Ambron; Ying J Sung; Michael D Gershon Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 3.960
Authors: Sang Pyo Lee; Kang Nyeong Lee; Oh Young Lee; Hang Lak Lee; Dae Won Jun; Byung Chul Yoon; Ho Soon Choi; Se Jin Hwang; Seo Eun Lee Journal: Gut Liver Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 4.519