Literature DB >> 22591110

Non-alpha-adrenergic effects on systemic vascular conductance during lower-body negative pressure, static exercise and muscle metaboreflex activation.

A M Kiviniemi1, M F Frances, M Rachinsky, R Craen, R J Petrella, H V Huikuri, M P Tulppo, J K Shoemaker.   

Abstract

AIM: This study tested the hypothesis that non-α-adrenergic mechanisms contribute to systemic vascular conductance (SVC) in a reflex-specific manner during the sympathoexcitatory manoeuvres.
METHODS: Twelve healthy subjects underwent lower-body negative pressure (LBNP, -40 mmHg) as well as static handgrip exercise (HG, 20% of maximal force) followed by post-exercise forearm circulatory occlusion (PECO, 5 min each) with and without α-adrenergic blockade induced by phentolamine (PHE). Aortic blood flow, finger blood pressure and superficial femoral artery blood flow were measured to calculate cardiac output, SVC and leg vascular conductance (LVC) during the last minute of each intervention.
RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased more during LBNP with PHE compared with saline (-7 ± 7 vs. -2 ± 5%, P = 0.016). PHE did not alter the MAP response to HG (+20 ± 12 and +24 ± 16%, respectively, for PHE and saline) but decreased the change in MAP during PECO (+12 ± 7 vs. +21 ± 14%, P = 0.005). The decrease in SVC and LVC with LBNP did not differ between saline and PHE trials (-13 ± 10 vs. -17 ± 10%, respectively, for SVC, P = 0.379). In contrast, the SVC response to HG increased from -9 ± 12 with saline to + 5 ± 15% with PHE (P = 0.002) and from -16 ± 15 with saline to +1 ± 16% with PHE during PECO (P = 0.003). LVC responses to HG or PECO were not different from saline with PHE.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-α-adrenergic vasoconstriction was present during LBNP. The systemic vasoconstriction during static exercise and isolated muscle metaboreflex activation, in the absence of leg vasoconstriction, was explained by an α-adrenergic mechanism. Therefore, non-α-adrenergic vasoconstriction is more emphasized during baroreflex, but not metaboreflex-mediated sympathetic activation.
© 2012 The Authors Acta Physiologica © 2012 Scandinavian Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22591110     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2012.02447.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)        ISSN: 1748-1708            Impact factor:   6.311


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sympathetic transduction in humans: recent advances and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Benjamin E Young; Jody L Greaney; David M Keller; Paul J Fadel
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Sex differences in the ventilatory and cardiovascular response to supine and tilted metaboreflex activation.

Authors:  Hitesh Joshi; Heather Edgell
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-03

3.  Factors mediating the pressor response to isometric muscle contraction: An experimental study in healthy volunteers during lower body negative pressure.

Authors:  Niels A Stens; Jonny Hisdal; Espen F Bakke; Narinder Kaur; Archana Sharma; Einar Stranden; Dick H J Thijssen; Lars Øivind Høiseth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Sex differences in the vascular response to sympathetic activation during acute hypoxaemia.

Authors:  Dain W Jacob; Jennifer L Harper; Clayton L Ivie; Elizabeth P Ott; Jacqueline K Limberg
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.858

5.  Improvement in hemodynamic responses to metaboreflex activation after one year of training in spinal cord injured humans.

Authors:  Raffaele Milia; Silvana Roberto; Elisabetta Marongiu; Sergio Olla; Irene Sanna; Luca Angius; Pierpaolo Bassareo; Marco Pinna; Filippo Tocco; Alberto Concu; Antonio Crisafulli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Neural regulation of cardiovascular response to exercise: role of central command and peripheral afferents.

Authors:  Antonio C L Nobrega; Donal O'Leary; Bruno Moreira Silva; Elisabetta Marongiu; Massimo F Piepoli; Antonio Crisafulli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.