Literature DB >> 22591073

Reconstruction of paternal genotypes over multiple breeding seasons reveals male green turtles do not breed annually.

Lucy I Wright1, Wayne J Fuller, Brendan J Godley, Andrew McGowan, Tom Tregenza, Annette C Broderick.   

Abstract

For species of conservation concern, knowledge of key life-history and demographic components, such as the number and sex ratio of breeding adults, is essential for accurate assessments of population viability. Species with temperature-dependent sex determination can produce heavily biased primary sex ratios, and there is concern that adult sex ratios may be similarly skewed or will become so as a result of climate warming. Prediction and mitigation of such impacts are difficult when life-history information is lacking. In marine turtles, owing to the difficultly in observing males at sea, the breeding interval of males is unknown. It has been suggested that male breeding periodicity may be shorter than that of females, which could help to compensate for generally female-biased sex ratios. Here we outline how the use of molecular-based paternity analysis has allowed us, for the first time, to assess the breeding interval of male marine turtles across multiple breeding seasons. In our study rookery of green turtles (Chelonia mydas), 97% of males were assigned offspring in only one breeding season within the 3-year study period, strongly suggesting that male breeding intervals are frequently longer than 1year at this site. Our results also reveal a sex ratio of breeding adults of at least 1.3 males to each female. This study illustrates the utility of molecular-based parentage inference using reconstruction of parental genotypes as a method for monitoring the number and sex ratio of breeders in species where direct observations or capture are difficult.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22591073     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05616.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  6 in total

1.  Satellite tracking reveals sex-specific migration distance in green turtles (Chelonia mydas).

Authors:  Martin Beal; Paulo Catry; Aissa Regalla; Castro Barbosa; António J Pires; Julie Mestre; Cheibani Senhoury; Ebaye Sidina; Ana Rita Patrício
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.812

2.  Breeding sex ratios in adult leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) may compensate for female-biased hatchling sex ratios.

Authors:  Kelly R Stewart; Peter H Dutton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Strong male-biased operational sex ratio in a breeding population of loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) inferred by paternal genotype reconstruction analysis.

Authors:  Jacob A Lasala; J Scott Harrison; Kris L Williams; David C Rostal
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Genetic variation, multiple paternity, and measures of reproductive success in the critically endangered hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata).

Authors:  Blanca Idalia González-Garza; Adam Stow; Lorenzo Felipe Sánchez-Teyer; Omar Zapata-Pérez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Breeding sex ratio and population size of loggerhead turtles from Southwestern Florida.

Authors:  Jacob A Lasala; Colin R Hughes; Jeanette Wyneken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The architecture of assisted colonisation in sea turtles: building new populations in a biodiversity crisis.

Authors:  Anna Barbanti; Janice M Blumenthal; Annette C Broderick; Brendan J Godley; Alejandro Prat-Varela; Maria Turmo; Marta Pascual; Carlos Carreras
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 17.694

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.