Literature DB >> 22591068

Systematic review and pooled analysis assessing the association between elderly age and outcome following surgical resection of esophageal malignancy.

S R Markar1, A Karthikesalingam, S Thrumurthy, A Ho, G Muallem, D E Low.   

Abstract

The incidence of esophageal malignancy continues to increase worldwide. At the same time, average life expectancy levels continue to climb, ensuring that more patients will present in their 70s, 80s, and 90s. The aim of this pooled analysis is to compare short- and long-term outcomes for elderly and younger patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignancy. Studies comparing the outcomes of esophagectomy for malignancy in elderly and young cohorts of patients were included. The minimum threshold age used to define the elderly cohort was 70 years. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, overall and cancer-related 5-year survival. Secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, the incidence of anastomotic leak, conduit ischemia, cardiac and pulmonary complications, and the use of neoadjuvant therapy. Twenty-five publications comprising 9531 and 2573 operations on younger and elderly cohorts of patients respectively were analyzed. Elderly patients were less likely to receive neoadjuvant therapy (14.6% vs. 29.47%; pooled odds ratio [POR]= 0.48; 95% confidence interval [C.I.]= 0.35-0.65; P < 0.05). Esophagectomy in elderly patients was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (7.83% vs. 4.21%; POR = 1.87; 95% C.I. = 1.54-2.26; P < 0.05), as well as increased pulmonary (21.77% vs. 19.49%) and cardiac (18.7% vs. 13.17%) complications. Subset analysis of studies using an age threshold of 80 years showed an even more significant association between in-hospital mortality and elderly age (pooled odds ratio = 3.19; 95% C.I. = 1.6-6.35; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in length of hospital stay, incidence of anastomotic leak, or conduit ischemia. The elderly group showed reduced overall 5-year survival (21.23% vs. 29.01%; pooled odds ratio = 0.73; 95% C.I. = 0.62-0.87; P < 0.05) and reduced cancer-free 5-year survival (34.4% vs. 41.8%; POR = 0.75; 95% C.I. = 0.64-0.89; P < 0.05). Elderly patients are at increased risk of pulmonary and cardiac complications, and perioperative mortality following esophagectomy, and show reduced cancer-related 5-year survival compared with younger patients. These patients represent a high-risk cohort, who requires thorough assessment of medical comorbidity, targeted counseling, and optimized treatment pathways.
© 2012 Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2012, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22591068     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01353.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  28 in total

1.  Increasing age is a predictor of short-term outcomes in esophagectomy: a propensity score adjusted analysis.

Authors:  Christopher C Stahl; Dennis J Hanseman; Koffi Wima; Jeffrey M Sutton; Gregory C Wilson; Samuel F Hohmann; Shimul A Shah; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Esophagectomy for cancer in octogenarians: should we do it?

Authors:  Elizabeth Paulus; Caroline Ripat; Vadim Koshenkov; Angela T Prescott; Kiran Sethi; Heather Stuart; Gregory Tiesi; Alan S Livingstone; Danny Yakoub
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Elderly Patients With Potentially Curable Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Mengyuan Chen; Jiping Xie; Yongling Ji; Liming Sheng; Guoqin Qiu; Xianghui Du; Qichun Wei
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Association of frailty with 90-day postoperative mortality & geriatric comanagement among older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Sincere McMillan; Soo Jung Kim; Amy L Tin; Robert J Downey; Andrew J Vickers; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki; Armin Shahrokni
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Prognostic nomogram for previously untreated patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jingjing Duan; Ting Deng; Guoguang Ying; Dingzhi Huang; Haiyang Zhang; Likun Zhou; Ming Bai; Hongli Li; Huimin Yang; Yanjun Qu; Xia Wang; Yi Ba
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Immediate and Long-Term Health Care Support Needs of Older Adults Undergoing Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Analysis of Postoperative Homecare Utilization.

Authors:  Tyler R Chesney; Barbara Haas; Natalie G Coburn; Alyson L Mahar; Victoria Zuk; Haoyu Zhao; Amy T Hsu; Julie Hallet
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Esophageal Cancer in Elderly Patients, Current Treatment Options and Outcomes; A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Authors:  Styliani Mantziari; Hugo Teixeira Farinha; Vianney Bouygues; Jean-Charles Vignal; Yannick Deswysen; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer; Guillaume Piessen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Esophageal cancer in elderly patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yuan Zeng; Wenhua Liang; Jun Liu; Jiaxi He; Calvin S H Ng; Chia-Chuan Liu; René Horsleben Petersen; Gaetano Rocco; Thomas D'Amico; Alessandro Brunelli; Haiquan Chen; Xiuyi Zhi; Xiao Dong; Wei Wang; Fei Cui; Dakai Xiao; Wenjun Wang; Wei Yang; Hui Pan; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Feasibility of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: a case-control study.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tsuchiya; Chikara Kunisaki; Sho Sato; Yusaku Tanaka; Kei Sato; Jun Watanabe; Kazuhisa Takeda; Takashi Kosaka; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Patient-Centered Time-at-Home Outcomes in Older Adults After Surgical Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Tyler R Chesney; Barbara Haas; Natalie G Coburn; Alyson L Mahar; Victoria Zuk; Haoyu Zhao; Frances C Wright; Amy T Hsu; Julie Hallet
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.