Literature DB >> 22590370

N-(3-Hy-droxy-phen-yl)nicotinamide.

Chunhua Ge1, Rui Zhang, Xiangdong Zhang, Chenglong Zhang, Meiyin Zhang.   

Abstract

In the title mol-ecule, C(12)H(10)N(2)O(2), the benzene and pyridine rings form a dihedral angle of 5.01 (8)°. The amide group is twisted by 33.54 (7)° from the plane of the pyridine ring. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked into centrosymmetric dimers via pairs of O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds. N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds further link dimers related into chains along the b axis.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22590370      PMCID: PMC3344608          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Mocilac & Gallagher (2011 ▶); Roopan et al. (2009 ▶). For modern aspects of boronic acid derivatives, see: Hall (2005 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C12H10N2O2 M = 214.22 Monoclinic, a = 12.1741 (13) Å b = 5.2613 (6) Å c = 15.3113 (16) Å β = 94.428 (2)° V = 977.79 (18) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.35 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.952, T max = 0.988 5813 measured reflections 1928 independent reflections 1572 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040 wR(F 2) = 0.098 S = 1.04 1928 reflections 150 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97, PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶) and WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015620/cv5281sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015620/cv5281Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812015620/cv5281Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C12H10N2O2F(000) = 448
Mr = 214.22Dx = 1.455 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 82 reflections
a = 12.1741 (13) Åθ = 2.2–23.3°
b = 5.2613 (6) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 15.3113 (16) ÅT = 293 K
β = 94.428 (2)°Block, colourless
V = 977.79 (18) Å30.35 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1928 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1572 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.022
φ and ω scansθmax = 26.1°, θmin = 1.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)h = −15→15
Tmin = 0.952, Tmax = 0.988k = −6→4
5813 measured reflectionsl = −18→18
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.098H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0441P)2 + 0.3178P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1928 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
150 parametersΔρmax = 0.31 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.17 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O20.10112 (9)0.0774 (2)0.89614 (8)0.0393 (3)
H2B0.1369−0.01790.92980.059*
N20.46607 (10)0.4089 (3)0.86950 (8)0.0293 (3)
C120.28388 (12)0.2438 (3)0.88031 (10)0.0289 (3)
H120.31550.11130.91370.035*
O10.51225 (9)0.8283 (2)0.87911 (8)0.0403 (3)
C50.73908 (12)0.6822 (3)0.88082 (10)0.0309 (4)
H50.72210.82990.84930.037*
N10.79027 (10)0.2474 (3)0.97897 (9)0.0327 (3)
C110.17038 (12)0.2524 (3)0.86264 (10)0.0310 (4)
C60.53822 (12)0.6020 (3)0.88392 (10)0.0279 (3)
C20.86888 (13)0.3961 (3)0.95025 (10)0.0339 (4)
H20.94200.34930.96320.041*
C90.19122 (13)0.6308 (3)0.77876 (10)0.0354 (4)
H90.15960.76050.74410.042*
C80.30484 (13)0.6289 (3)0.79759 (10)0.0310 (4)
H80.34900.75600.77670.037*
C40.65565 (12)0.5257 (3)0.90684 (9)0.0267 (3)
C70.35048 (12)0.4310 (3)0.84863 (9)0.0267 (3)
C10.84752 (13)0.6154 (3)0.90241 (11)0.0349 (4)
H10.90480.71590.88510.042*
C30.68548 (12)0.3122 (3)0.95639 (10)0.0307 (4)
H30.62980.20870.97490.037*
C100.12390 (13)0.4454 (3)0.81013 (10)0.0349 (4)
H100.04820.45010.79620.042*
H2A0.4898 (13)0.261 (4)0.8741 (10)0.030 (5)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O20.0341 (6)0.0315 (7)0.0528 (8)0.0008 (5)0.0074 (5)0.0036 (5)
N20.0292 (7)0.0198 (7)0.0385 (8)0.0021 (6)−0.0012 (5)0.0000 (6)
C120.0318 (8)0.0221 (8)0.0323 (8)0.0038 (6)−0.0013 (6)−0.0014 (6)
O10.0347 (6)0.0231 (6)0.0624 (8)0.0011 (5)−0.0004 (5)−0.0003 (5)
C50.0350 (8)0.0266 (8)0.0311 (8)−0.0025 (7)0.0027 (6)0.0010 (6)
N10.0306 (7)0.0273 (7)0.0396 (7)0.0001 (6)−0.0012 (6)−0.0012 (6)
C110.0303 (8)0.0270 (8)0.0360 (8)−0.0001 (7)0.0037 (6)−0.0074 (7)
C60.0301 (8)0.0238 (8)0.0298 (8)0.0004 (6)0.0027 (6)−0.0003 (6)
C20.0276 (8)0.0333 (9)0.0402 (9)0.0008 (7)−0.0006 (7)−0.0051 (7)
C90.0422 (9)0.0320 (9)0.0311 (8)0.0121 (8)−0.0025 (7)−0.0001 (7)
C80.0366 (8)0.0268 (8)0.0294 (8)0.0010 (7)0.0007 (6)−0.0011 (6)
C40.0299 (8)0.0228 (8)0.0274 (7)0.0000 (6)0.0023 (6)−0.0049 (6)
C70.0283 (7)0.0229 (8)0.0284 (7)0.0021 (6)−0.0002 (6)−0.0044 (6)
C10.0301 (8)0.0372 (9)0.0381 (9)−0.0065 (7)0.0062 (7)−0.0026 (7)
C30.0295 (8)0.0266 (8)0.0360 (8)−0.0034 (6)0.0021 (6)−0.0018 (7)
C100.0289 (8)0.0383 (10)0.0370 (9)0.0070 (7)−0.0010 (7)−0.0069 (7)
O2—C111.3741 (19)C11—C101.388 (2)
O2—H2B0.8200C6—C41.500 (2)
N2—C61.350 (2)C2—C11.381 (2)
N2—C71.4234 (19)C2—H20.9300
N2—H2A0.831 (18)C9—C101.384 (2)
C12—C71.387 (2)C9—C81.391 (2)
C12—C111.388 (2)C9—H90.9300
C12—H120.9300C8—C71.391 (2)
O1—C61.2325 (18)C8—H80.9300
C5—C11.381 (2)C4—C31.388 (2)
C5—C41.389 (2)C1—H10.9300
C5—H50.9300C3—H30.9300
N1—C21.336 (2)C10—H100.9300
N1—C31.3396 (19)
C11—O2—H2B109.5C10—C9—H9119.0
C6—N2—C7126.48 (14)C8—C9—H9119.0
C6—N2—H2A118.2 (12)C9—C8—C7117.99 (15)
C7—N2—H2A115.3 (11)C9—C8—H8121.0
C7—C12—C11120.56 (14)C7—C8—H8121.0
C7—C12—H12119.7C3—C4—C5118.02 (14)
C11—C12—H12119.7C3—C4—C6123.28 (13)
C1—C5—C4119.16 (15)C5—C4—C6118.62 (14)
C1—C5—H5120.4C12—C7—C8120.59 (14)
C4—C5—H5120.4C12—C7—N2117.24 (13)
C2—N1—C3117.27 (14)C8—C7—N2122.16 (14)
O2—C11—C12122.38 (14)C2—C1—C5118.47 (15)
O2—C11—C10118.15 (14)C2—C1—H1120.8
C12—C11—C10119.47 (14)C5—C1—H1120.8
O1—C6—N2123.82 (14)N1—C3—C4123.40 (14)
O1—C6—C4120.52 (14)N1—C3—H3118.3
N2—C6—C4115.67 (13)C4—C3—H3118.3
N1—C2—C1123.60 (15)C9—C10—C11119.38 (14)
N1—C2—H2118.2C9—C10—H10120.3
C1—C2—H2118.2C11—C10—H10120.3
C10—C9—C8121.96 (15)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2B···N1i0.822.002.817 (2)173
N2—H2A···O1ii0.83 (2)2.29 (2)3.107 (2)166
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O2—H2B⋯N1i0.822.002.817 (2)173
N2—H2A⋯O1ii0.83 (2)2.29 (2)3.107 (2)166

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  N-Phenyl-nicotinamide.

Authors:  S Mohana Roopan; Venkatesha R Hathwar; A Sudheer Kumar; N Malathi; F Nawaz Khan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-02-21

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.