Literature DB >> 22590213

2,3-Dihydro-1λ(6),2-benzothia-zine-1,1,4-trione.

Farhana Aman, Waseeq Ahmad Siddiqui, Adnan Ashraf, M Nawaz Tahir.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(8)H(7)NO(3)S, the benzene ring is oriented at a dihedral angle of 69.25 (7)° to the S and O atoms of the sulfonyl group. The heterocyclic ring approximates to an envelope, with the N atom in the flap position. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by N-H⋯O(c) (c = carbon-yl) hydrogen bonds, forming C(5) chains along [001]. Two R(2) (2)(10) loops arise from pairs of C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and a weak aromatic π-π stacking inter-action [centroid-centorid separation = 3.8404 (11) Å] also occurs.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22590213      PMCID: PMC3344451          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812013827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For chemical background and related structures, see: Siddiqui et al. (2007 ▶, 2008 ▶). For graph-set notation, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶). For puckering parameters, see: Cremer & Pople (1975 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H7NO3S M = 197.21 Monoclinic, a = 8.4950 (4) Å b = 13.7560 (5) Å c = 7.6677 (3) Å β = 113.214 (1)° V = 823.48 (6) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.36 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.35 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.915, T max = 0.938 7644 measured reflections 2017 independent reflections 1692 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.036 wR(F 2) = 0.098 S = 1.04 2017 reflections 121 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.33 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.37 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶) and PLATON. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812013827/hb6713sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812013827/hb6713Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812013827/hb6713Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H7NO3SF(000) = 408
Mr = 197.21Dx = 1.591 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1692 reflections
a = 8.4950 (4) Åθ = 2.6–28.3°
b = 13.7560 (5) ŵ = 0.36 mm1
c = 7.6677 (3) ÅT = 296 K
β = 113.214 (1)°Needle, light yellow
V = 823.48 (6) Å30.35 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4
Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer2017 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1692 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.022
Detector resolution: 7.50 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.6°
ω scansh = −11→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005)k = −16→18
Tmin = 0.915, Tmax = 0.938l = −10→10
7644 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.098H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0455P)2 + 0.3408P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2017 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
121 parametersΔρmax = 0.33 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.37 e Å3
Geometry. Bond distances, angles etc. have been calculated using the rounded fractional coordinates. All su's are estimated from the variances of the (full) variance-covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account in the estimation of distances, angles and torsion angles
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.28018 (5)0.04479 (3)0.18815 (6)0.0352 (2)
O10.21934 (19)−0.00868 (10)0.3084 (2)0.0539 (5)
O20.25497 (18)0.00747 (10)0.00536 (19)0.0499 (5)
O30.55335 (18)0.29145 (11)0.1183 (2)0.0532 (5)
N10.4843 (2)0.06118 (11)0.3034 (2)0.0405 (5)
C10.1985 (2)0.16427 (11)0.1625 (2)0.0297 (4)
C20.0353 (2)0.18011 (14)0.1537 (3)0.0392 (5)
C3−0.0234 (2)0.27484 (15)0.1446 (3)0.0447 (6)
C40.0788 (2)0.35176 (14)0.1427 (3)0.0430 (6)
C50.2406 (2)0.33587 (13)0.1476 (3)0.0363 (5)
C60.30357 (19)0.24184 (11)0.1576 (2)0.0285 (4)
C70.4782 (2)0.22672 (12)0.1609 (2)0.0331 (5)
C80.5621 (2)0.12808 (13)0.2121 (3)0.0429 (6)
H10.502 (3)0.0766 (17)0.410 (3)0.0486*
H2−0.034480.128040.153980.0471*
H3−0.132930.286330.139700.0537*
H40.038540.414990.137990.0516*
H50.308240.388420.144220.0436*
H8A0.560370.097650.097250.0514*
H8B0.681150.137450.296190.0514*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0387 (3)0.0236 (2)0.0436 (3)−0.0023 (2)0.0165 (2)−0.0012 (2)
O10.0633 (10)0.0355 (7)0.0697 (10)−0.0056 (6)0.0335 (8)0.0110 (6)
O20.0576 (9)0.0383 (7)0.0513 (8)−0.0023 (6)0.0188 (7)−0.0148 (6)
O30.0408 (8)0.0479 (8)0.0783 (10)−0.0039 (6)0.0314 (7)0.0131 (7)
N10.0384 (8)0.0292 (8)0.0486 (8)0.0044 (6)0.0116 (7)0.0025 (6)
C10.0308 (8)0.0278 (8)0.0307 (7)0.0003 (6)0.0123 (6)−0.0008 (6)
C20.0305 (9)0.0446 (10)0.0442 (9)−0.0037 (7)0.0164 (7)0.0001 (8)
C30.0320 (9)0.0579 (12)0.0475 (10)0.0120 (8)0.0192 (8)0.0034 (9)
C40.0462 (11)0.0384 (10)0.0452 (10)0.0154 (8)0.0189 (8)0.0017 (8)
C50.0425 (10)0.0273 (8)0.0409 (9)0.0022 (7)0.0184 (7)0.0013 (7)
C60.0295 (8)0.0273 (8)0.0299 (7)0.0012 (6)0.0129 (6)0.0006 (6)
C70.0309 (8)0.0327 (9)0.0372 (8)−0.0018 (7)0.0152 (7)−0.0016 (7)
C80.0321 (9)0.0371 (10)0.0625 (12)0.0031 (7)0.0219 (8)−0.0036 (8)
S1—O11.4262 (16)C4—C51.378 (3)
S1—O21.4273 (14)C5—C61.390 (2)
S1—N11.6219 (18)C6—C71.488 (2)
S1—C11.7646 (16)C7—C81.511 (2)
O3—C71.213 (2)C2—H20.9300
N1—C81.462 (3)C3—H30.9300
N1—H10.80 (2)C4—H40.9300
C1—C21.379 (3)C5—H50.9300
C1—C61.401 (2)C8—H8A0.9700
C2—C31.387 (3)C8—H8B0.9700
C3—C41.372 (3)
O1—S1—O2119.80 (9)C1—C6—C7122.30 (14)
O1—S1—N1107.55 (9)O3—C7—C6121.31 (16)
O1—S1—C1109.00 (9)O3—C7—C8119.00 (17)
O2—S1—N1107.42 (9)C6—C7—C8119.66 (15)
O2—S1—C1108.99 (8)N1—C8—C7115.70 (16)
N1—S1—C1102.72 (8)C1—C2—H2121.00
S1—N1—C8114.49 (12)C3—C2—H2120.00
C8—N1—H1112.6 (18)C2—C3—H3120.00
S1—N1—H1108.9 (19)C4—C3—H3120.00
C2—C1—C6121.15 (15)C3—C4—H4120.00
S1—C1—C6119.06 (13)C5—C4—H4120.00
S1—C1—C2119.76 (13)C4—C5—H5120.00
C1—C2—C3119.05 (17)C6—C5—H5120.00
C2—C3—C4120.56 (18)N1—C8—H8A108.00
C3—C4—C5120.39 (18)N1—C8—H8B108.00
C4—C5—C6120.48 (17)C7—C8—H8A108.00
C5—C6—C7119.36 (15)C7—C8—H8B108.00
C1—C6—C5118.34 (16)H8A—C8—H8B107.00
O1—S1—N1—C8−170.75 (13)C2—C1—C6—C7−178.08 (15)
O2—S1—N1—C859.04 (14)S1—C1—C6—C5−176.60 (13)
C1—S1—N1—C8−55.82 (14)C1—C2—C3—C40.6 (3)
O1—S1—C1—C2−36.22 (16)C2—C3—C4—C50.8 (3)
O2—S1—C1—C296.19 (16)C3—C4—C5—C6−1.0 (3)
N1—S1—C1—C2−150.09 (14)C4—C5—C6—C10.0 (3)
O1—S1—C1—C6141.74 (12)C4—C5—C6—C7179.44 (17)
O2—S1—C1—C6−85.85 (14)C1—C6—C7—C8−13.2 (2)
N1—S1—C1—C627.87 (14)C5—C6—C7—O3−14.6 (2)
S1—N1—C8—C753.31 (19)C1—C6—C7—O3164.83 (15)
S1—C1—C2—C3176.30 (15)C5—C6—C7—C8167.41 (16)
C6—C1—C2—C3−1.6 (3)O3—C7—C8—N1166.31 (15)
S1—C1—C6—C73.99 (19)C6—C7—C8—N1−15.6 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C51.3 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O3i0.80 (2)2.34 (2)3.028 (2)144 (2)
C2—H2···O2ii0.932.583.443 (2)154
C8—H8A···O2iii0.972.483.273 (2)139
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O3i0.80 (2)2.34 (2)3.028 (2)144 (2)
C2—H2⋯O2ii0.932.583.443 (2)154
C8—H8A⋯O2iii0.972.483.273 (2)139

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Methyl 4-hydr-oxy-2H-1,2-benzothia-zine-3-carboxyl-ate 1,1-dioxide.

Authors:  Waseeq Ahmad Siddiqui; Saeed Ahmad; Hamid Latif Siddiqui; Mujahid Hussain Bukhari; Masood Parvez
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-09-13

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.