Literature DB >> 22590062

trans-Dichloridobis(quinoline-κN)platinum(II).

Kwang Ha1.   

Abstract

In the title complex, trans-[PtCl(2)(C(9)H(7)N)(2)], the Pt(II) ion is four-coordinated in an essentially square-planar coordination environment defined by two N atoms from two quinoline (qu) ligands and two Cl(-) anions. The Pt atom is located on an inversion centre and thus the asymmetric unit contains one half of the complex; the PtN(2)Cl(2) unit is exactly planar. The dihedral angle between the PtN(2)Cl(2) unit and the quinoline ligand is 85.1 (1)°. In the crystal, the complex mol-ecules are stacked into columns along the b axis. In the columns, several inter-molecular π-π inter-actions between the six-membered rings are present, the shortest ring centroid-centroid distance being 3.733 (5) Å between pyridine rings.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22590062      PMCID: PMC3344296          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812013608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the crystal structure of (H-qu)2[PtCl6]·2H2O, see: Ha (2012a ▶). For the crystal structures of the related PtII complexes cis-[PtCl2(qu)2].0.25DMF (DMF = N,N-dimethyl­formamide) and cis-[PtCl2(qu)2].CH3NO2, see: Davies et al. (2001 ▶); Ha (2012b ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[PtCl2(C9H7N)2] M = 524.30 Monoclinic, a = 16.3722 (18) Å b = 6.9543 (7) Å c = 16.0422 (17) Å β = 118.684 (2)° V = 1602.4 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 9.09 mm−1 T = 200 K 0.21 × 0.08 × 0.07 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.596, T max = 1.000 4630 measured reflections 1569 independent reflections 1025 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.053

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034 wR(F 2) = 0.080 S = 0.97 1569 reflections 106 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 1.74 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.97 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812013608/ng5260sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812013608/ng5260Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[PtCl2(C9H7N)2]F(000) = 992
Mr = 524.30Dx = 2.173 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 2043 reflections
a = 16.3722 (18) Åθ = 2.8–25.9°
b = 6.9543 (7) ŵ = 9.09 mm1
c = 16.0422 (17) ÅT = 200 K
β = 118.684 (2)°Block, yellow
V = 1602.4 (3) Å30.21 × 0.08 × 0.07 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer1569 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1025 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.053
φ and ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000)h = −20→17
Tmin = 0.596, Tmax = 1.000k = −8→8
4630 measured reflectionsl = −19→19
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.080H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.97w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0357P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1569 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
106 parametersΔρmax = 1.74 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.97 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Pt10.00000.50000.00000.02655 (16)
Cl1−0.01185 (14)0.3931 (3)0.12923 (14)0.0373 (5)
N10.1091 (4)0.3178 (9)0.0354 (4)0.0270 (15)
C10.0927 (5)0.1473 (11)−0.0038 (5)0.0297 (19)
H10.03040.1167−0.04920.036*
C20.1608 (6)0.0079 (12)0.0170 (6)0.0353 (18)
H20.1455−0.1133−0.01410.042*
C30.2506 (6)0.0500 (11)0.0836 (6)0.036 (2)
H30.2986−0.04260.09980.043*
C40.2710 (5)0.2304 (11)0.1273 (5)0.0247 (17)
C50.3626 (5)0.2867 (13)0.1961 (5)0.036 (2)
H50.41250.19820.21420.043*
C60.3801 (6)0.4626 (12)0.2362 (6)0.036 (2)
H60.44160.49700.28210.043*
C70.3073 (6)0.5943 (14)0.2100 (6)0.037 (2)
H70.32010.71840.23820.044*
C80.2177 (6)0.5482 (11)0.1443 (6)0.031 (2)
H80.16910.63930.12750.037*
C90.1986 (5)0.3668 (11)0.1025 (5)0.0257 (18)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Pt10.0162 (2)0.0315 (2)0.0279 (2)0.0031 (3)0.00741 (16)0.0021 (3)
Cl10.0322 (11)0.0474 (13)0.0335 (10)0.0094 (11)0.0169 (9)0.0103 (11)
N10.016 (3)0.031 (4)0.033 (3)0.000 (3)0.011 (3)0.003 (3)
C10.023 (4)0.027 (5)0.033 (4)−0.003 (4)0.009 (4)−0.005 (4)
C20.041 (5)0.025 (4)0.045 (4)0.001 (5)0.025 (4)0.001 (5)
C30.034 (5)0.037 (6)0.045 (5)0.011 (4)0.025 (4)0.011 (4)
C40.025 (4)0.023 (4)0.033 (4)0.002 (3)0.018 (4)0.007 (4)
C50.019 (4)0.050 (6)0.036 (5)0.008 (4)0.011 (4)0.009 (4)
C60.025 (4)0.054 (7)0.029 (4)0.000 (4)0.013 (4)0.000 (4)
C70.030 (5)0.042 (5)0.033 (4)−0.005 (4)0.011 (4)−0.008 (4)
C80.023 (4)0.036 (6)0.034 (4)0.001 (3)0.014 (4)−0.005 (4)
C90.022 (4)0.030 (5)0.026 (4)0.002 (4)0.013 (4)0.004 (4)
Pt1—N1i2.036 (6)C3—H30.9500
Pt1—N12.036 (6)C4—C91.418 (10)
Pt1—Cl1i2.297 (2)C4—C51.425 (10)
Pt1—Cl12.297 (2)C5—C61.347 (10)
N1—C11.308 (9)C5—H50.9500
N1—C91.382 (9)C6—C71.398 (12)
C1—C21.392 (10)C6—H60.9500
C1—H10.9500C7—C81.371 (11)
C2—C31.371 (12)C7—H70.9500
C2—H20.9500C8—C91.392 (11)
C3—C41.398 (10)C8—H80.9500
N1i—Pt1—N1180.0C3—C4—C9119.6 (7)
N1i—Pt1—Cl1i89.40 (18)C3—C4—C5123.0 (8)
N1—Pt1—Cl1i90.60 (18)C9—C4—C5117.4 (7)
N1i—Pt1—Cl190.60 (18)C6—C5—C4121.5 (8)
N1—Pt1—Cl189.40 (18)C6—C5—H5119.2
Cl1i—Pt1—Cl1180.00 (10)C4—C5—H5119.2
C1—N1—C9119.7 (7)C5—C6—C7119.7 (8)
C1—N1—Pt1118.7 (5)C5—C6—H6120.1
C9—N1—Pt1121.6 (5)C7—C6—H6120.1
N1—C1—C2124.0 (7)C8—C7—C6121.4 (8)
N1—C1—H1118.0C8—C7—H7119.3
C2—C1—H1118.0C6—C7—H7119.3
C3—C2—C1118.3 (8)C7—C8—C9119.5 (7)
C3—C2—H2120.8C7—C8—H8120.2
C1—C2—H2120.8C9—C8—H8120.2
C2—C3—C4119.4 (8)N1—C9—C8120.6 (7)
C2—C3—H3120.3N1—C9—C4119.0 (7)
C4—C3—H3120.3C8—C9—C4120.5 (7)
Cl1i—Pt1—N1—C1−86.2 (6)C5—C6—C7—C80.3 (13)
Cl1—Pt1—N1—C193.8 (6)C6—C7—C8—C9−0.2 (12)
Cl1i—Pt1—N1—C996.8 (5)C1—N1—C9—C8179.3 (7)
Cl1—Pt1—N1—C9−83.2 (5)Pt1—N1—C9—C8−3.7 (9)
C9—N1—C1—C2−0.6 (12)C1—N1—C9—C40.1 (10)
Pt1—N1—C1—C2−177.7 (6)Pt1—N1—C9—C4177.1 (5)
N1—C1—C2—C30.9 (13)C7—C8—C9—N1−179.3 (7)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.6 (12)C7—C8—C9—C4−0.1 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C90.2 (12)C3—C4—C9—N10.1 (11)
C2—C3—C4—C5−179.1 (7)C5—C4—C9—N1179.4 (7)
C3—C4—C5—C6179.2 (8)C3—C4—C9—C8−179.1 (7)
C9—C4—C5—C6−0.1 (11)C5—C4—C9—C80.2 (11)
C4—C5—C6—C7−0.2 (12)
Pt1—N12.036 (6)
Pt1—Cl12.297 (2)
N1—Pt1—Cl189.40 (18)
  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Structure, stability, and interconversion barriers of the rotamers of cis-[Pt(II)Cl(2)(quinoline)2] and cis-[Pt(II)Cl(2)(3-bromoquinoline)(quinoline)] from X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy and molecular mechanics evidence.

Authors:  M S Davies; C I Diakos; B A Messerle; T W Hambley
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2001-06-18       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  cis-Dichloridobis(quinoline-κN)-platinum(II) nitro-methane monosolvate.

Authors:  Kwang Ha
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-03-28

4.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.