Literature DB >> 22590057

Poly[[diaqua-hexa-μ-cyanido-cerium(III)ferrate(III)] dihydrate].

Deng-Yong Yu, Xiao-Qing Liu, Ai-Hua Yuan.   

Abstract

In the structure of the title complex, {[CeFe(CN)(6)(H(2)O)(2)]·2H(2)O}(n), the Ce(III) and Fe(III) atoms exhibit square anti-prismatic [CeN(6)(H(2)O)(2)] (site symmetry m2m) and octahedral [FeC(6)] (site symmetry 2/m) coordination geometries, respectively. The metal atoms are linked alternately through the cyanide groups, forming a three-dimensional framework in which the {Ce(2)Fe(2)(CN)(4)} puckered square unit is the basic building block. The crystal packing is enforced by O-H⋯O and O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds, including the uncoordinated water molecule which is located on a mirror plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22590057      PMCID: PMC3344291          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812016911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to hexa­cyanido­metalate(III)-based lanthanide complexes, see: Andruh et al. (2009 ▶). For related structures, see: Gramlich et al. (1990 ▶); Petter et al. (1989 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[CeFe(CN)6(H2O)2]·2H2O M = 424.15 Orthorhombic, a = 7.3806 (11) Å b = 12.7836 (19) Å c = 13.619 (2) Å V = 1285.0 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 4.64 mm−1 T = 173 K 0.22 × 0.20 × 0.17 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004 ▶) T min = 0.428, T max = 0.506 5578 measured reflections 831 independent reflections 785 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.088

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.037 wR(F 2) = 0.098 S = 1.06 831 reflections 51 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 1.08 e Å−3 Δρmin = −2.69 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812016911/rz2741sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812016911/rz2741Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[CeFe(CN)6(H2O)2]·2H2OF(000) = 808
Mr = 424.15Dx = 2.193 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, CmcmMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2c 2Cell parameters from 3234 reflections
a = 7.3806 (11) Åθ = 3.0–27.4°
b = 12.7836 (19) ŵ = 4.64 mm1
c = 13.619 (2) ÅT = 173 K
V = 1285.0 (3) Å3Block, red
Z = 40.22 × 0.20 × 0.17 mm
Bruker APEXII diffractometer831 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube785 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.088
phi and ω scansθmax = 27.4°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004)h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.428, Tmax = 0.506k = −16→16
5578 measured reflectionsl = −17→17
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.098H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0233P)2 + 48.4374P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
831 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
51 parametersΔρmax = 1.08 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −2.69 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C11.00000.1368 (7)0.0590 (7)0.0204 (18)
C21.3141 (9)0.4530 (5)0.4106 (5)0.0208 (13)
Ce11.00000.32343 (4)0.25000.0064 (2)
Fe11.00000.00000.00000.0164 (4)
N11.00000.2186 (6)0.0965 (6)0.0254 (17)
N21.2003 (9)0.4229 (4)0.3582 (5)0.0285 (13)
O10.7401 (11)0.2171 (6)0.25000.0347 (17)
H1A0.71290.18790.30420.052*
O20.50000.1562 (6)0.3993 (6)0.0342 (17)
H2A0.50000.09140.41310.051*
H2B0.50000.19220.45180.051*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.022 (5)0.022 (4)0.017 (4)0.0000.000−0.001 (4)
C20.021 (3)0.021 (3)0.021 (3)−0.002 (2)0.000 (3)−0.003 (2)
Ce10.0053 (3)0.0080 (3)0.0058 (3)0.0000.0000.000
Fe10.0150 (8)0.0176 (8)0.0164 (9)0.0000.0000.0002 (6)
N10.025 (4)0.026 (4)0.025 (4)0.0000.000−0.002 (3)
N20.026 (3)0.033 (3)0.026 (3)−0.005 (2)−0.001 (3)−0.002 (2)
O10.029 (4)0.049 (4)0.026 (4)−0.015 (4)0.0000.000
O20.035 (4)0.036 (4)0.032 (4)0.0000.0000.002 (3)
C1—N11.163 (12)Ce1—N12.483 (8)
C1—Fe11.925 (9)Ce1—N1iv2.483 (8)
C2—N21.167 (9)Fe1—C1v1.925 (9)
C2—Fe1i1.930 (7)Fe1—C2vi1.930 (7)
Ce1—O12.351 (7)Fe1—C2vii1.930 (7)
Ce1—O1ii2.351 (7)Fe1—C2viii1.930 (7)
Ce1—N22.444 (6)Fe1—C2ix1.930 (7)
Ce1—N2iii2.444 (6)O1—H1A0.8503
Ce1—N2ii2.444 (6)O2—H2A0.8500
Ce1—N2iv2.444 (6)O2—H2B0.8500
N1—C1—Fe1178.7 (8)N2—Ce1—N1iv76.9 (2)
N2—C2—Fe1i178.3 (6)N2iii—Ce1—N1iv142.05 (16)
O1—Ce1—O1ii109.4 (4)N2ii—Ce1—N1iv76.9 (2)
O1—Ce1—N2142.58 (15)N2iv—Ce1—N1iv142.05 (16)
O1ii—Ce1—N278.9 (2)N1—Ce1—N1iv114.7 (4)
O1—Ce1—N2iii78.9 (2)C1v—Fe1—C1180.0 (5)
O1ii—Ce1—N2iii142.58 (15)C1v—Fe1—C2vi91.1 (3)
N2—Ce1—N2iii117.3 (3)C1—Fe1—C2vi88.9 (3)
O1—Ce1—N2ii78.9 (2)C1v—Fe1—C2vii88.9 (3)
O1ii—Ce1—N2ii142.58 (15)C1—Fe1—C2vii91.1 (3)
N2—Ce1—N2ii74.4 (3)C2vi—Fe1—C2vii180.0 (4)
N2iii—Ce1—N2ii74.2 (3)C1v—Fe1—C2viii88.9 (3)
O1—Ce1—N2iv142.58 (15)C1—Fe1—C2viii91.1 (3)
O1ii—Ce1—N2iv78.9 (2)C2vi—Fe1—C2viii89.4 (4)
N2—Ce1—N2iv74.2 (3)C2vii—Fe1—C2viii90.6 (4)
N2iii—Ce1—N2iv74.4 (3)C1v—Fe1—C2ix91.1 (3)
N2ii—Ce1—N2iv117.3 (3)C1—Fe1—C2ix88.9 (3)
O1—Ce1—N171.82 (14)C2vi—Fe1—C2ix90.6 (4)
O1ii—Ce1—N171.82 (14)C2vii—Fe1—C2ix89.4 (4)
N2—Ce1—N1142.05 (16)C2viii—Fe1—C2ix180.0 (4)
N2iii—Ce1—N176.9 (2)C1—N1—Ce1148.7 (8)
N2ii—Ce1—N1142.05 (16)C2—N2—Ce1167.2 (5)
N2iv—Ce1—N176.9 (2)Ce1—O1—H1A116.5
O1—Ce1—N1iv71.82 (14)H2A—O2—H2B110.0
O1ii—Ce1—N1iv71.82 (14)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1A···O20.852.082.807 (8)144
O2—H2B···N1x0.852.283.126 (11)177
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1A⋯O20.852.082.807 (8)144
O2—H2B⋯N1i0.852.283.126 (11)177

Symmetry code: (i) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  3d-4f combined chemistry: synthetic strategies and magnetic properties.

Authors:  Marius Andruh; Jean-Pierre Costes; Carmen Diaz; Song Gao
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 5.165

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.