Literature DB >> 22589762

catena-Poly[[dichloridomercury(II)]-N'-nicotinoylnicotinohydrazide].

Teng Ma1, Yuanlu Wang, Fengliang Wang, Fei Li.   

Abstract

The title complex, [HgCl(2)(C(12)H(10)N(4)O(2))](n), is composed of one Hg(II) ion, one nnh ligand (nnh = N'-nicotinoylnicotinohydrazide) and two coordinated chloride ions. The Hg(II) ion shows a distorted tetra-hedral geometry, being surrounded by two N atoms from two nnh ligands and two chloride ions. Due to the bridging role of nnh, the Hg(II) atoms are connected into polymeric chains along the c axis, which are further inter-linked via N-H⋯O and C-H⋯Cl hydrogen-bonding inter-actions, forming a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22589762      PMCID: PMC3343788          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812008884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the coordination systems of N-donor heterocyclic groups, see: Zhang & Chen (2010 ▶); Ma et al. (2005 ▶); Tao et al. (2010 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[HgCl2(C12H10N4O2)] M = 513.73 Monoclinic, a = 7.2514 (4) Å b = 4.7113 (3) Å c = 21.8591 (11) Å β = 103.394 (2)° V = 726.47 (7) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 10.97 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.30 × 0.26 × 0.22 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.137, T max = 0.196 3510 measured reflections 1288 independent reflections 1244 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.018

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.016 wR(F 2) = 0.038 S = 1.09 1288 reflections 96 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.52 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.57 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812008884/hp2029sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812008884/hp2029Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[HgCl2(C12H10N4O2)]F(000) = 480
Mr = 513.73Dx = 2.349 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ycCell parameters from 2648 reflections
a = 7.2514 (4) Åθ = 2.9–27.9°
b = 4.7113 (3) ŵ = 10.97 mm1
c = 21.8591 (11) ÅT = 296 K
β = 103.394 (2)°BLOCK, yellow
V = 726.47 (7) Å30.30 × 0.26 × 0.22 mm
Z = 2
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1288 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1244 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.018
phi and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 1.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.137, Tmax = 0.196k = −5→5
3510 measured reflectionsl = −14→26
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.016Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.038H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0224P)2 + 0.0147P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1288 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
96 parametersΔρmax = 0.52 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.57 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Hg10.50001.07616 (3)0.75000.03638 (8)
Cl10.81805 (12)1.1749 (2)0.79628 (5)0.0524 (2)
O10.7884 (3)0.1092 (4)0.98476 (12)0.0385 (5)
N10.4508 (3)0.7488 (5)0.83334 (12)0.0348 (6)
N20.9166 (4)0.5412 (5)0.97954 (13)0.0293 (6)
H2A0.90480.70960.96390.035*
C10.6042 (4)0.6598 (6)0.87486 (15)0.0305 (6)
H10.72110.73610.87300.037*
C20.2825 (5)0.6416 (8)0.83653 (16)0.0405 (8)
H20.17410.70540.80820.049*
C30.2644 (5)0.4401 (7)0.88032 (18)0.0423 (8)
H30.14540.36980.88150.051*
C40.4239 (4)0.3429 (7)0.92245 (15)0.0345 (7)
H40.41460.20230.95140.041*
C50.5987 (4)0.4593 (6)0.92072 (15)0.0267 (6)
C60.7733 (4)0.3541 (6)0.96446 (14)0.0264 (6)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Hg10.03059 (11)0.04571 (12)0.02898 (11)0.000−0.00099 (8)0.000
Cl10.0347 (4)0.0712 (6)0.0475 (5)−0.0132 (4)0.0020 (4)−0.0076 (5)
O10.0319 (12)0.0234 (10)0.0553 (15)0.0000 (8)0.0000 (11)0.0057 (9)
N10.0289 (13)0.0411 (14)0.0303 (14)0.0040 (11)−0.0016 (11)−0.0001 (12)
N20.0235 (12)0.0220 (11)0.0361 (15)−0.0008 (9)−0.0057 (11)0.0066 (10)
C10.0271 (15)0.0304 (14)0.0316 (16)−0.0018 (12)0.0017 (13)−0.0014 (13)
C20.0293 (17)0.0529 (18)0.0331 (18)0.0022 (14)−0.0053 (15)−0.0012 (15)
C30.0234 (17)0.058 (2)0.042 (2)−0.0087 (14)0.0019 (15)−0.0062 (16)
C40.0292 (17)0.0387 (15)0.0339 (17)−0.0052 (13)0.0041 (14)−0.0009 (14)
C50.0254 (15)0.0255 (13)0.0279 (16)−0.0010 (11)0.0032 (13)−0.0054 (12)
C60.0251 (15)0.0239 (13)0.0295 (16)0.0008 (11)0.0051 (13)−0.0018 (12)
Hg1—Cl12.3405 (9)C1—C51.385 (5)
Hg1—Cl1i2.3405 (9)C1—H10.9300
Hg1—N1i2.475 (2)C2—C31.376 (5)
Hg1—N12.475 (2)C2—H20.9300
O1—C61.232 (3)C3—C41.379 (5)
N1—C11.330 (4)C3—H30.9300
N1—C21.338 (4)C4—C51.390 (4)
N2—C61.344 (4)C4—H40.9300
N2—N2ii1.383 (5)C5—C61.484 (4)
N2—H2A0.8601
Cl1—Hg1—Cl1i157.08 (6)N1—C2—C3122.1 (3)
Cl1—Hg1—N1i98.41 (6)N1—C2—H2118.9
Cl1i—Hg1—N1i95.81 (6)C3—C2—H2118.9
Cl1—Hg1—N195.81 (6)C2—C3—C4119.6 (3)
Cl1i—Hg1—N198.41 (6)C2—C3—H3120.2
N1i—Hg1—N1102.92 (11)C4—C3—H3120.2
C1—N1—C2118.3 (3)C3—C4—C5118.7 (3)
C1—N1—Hg1117.28 (19)C3—C4—H4120.7
C2—N1—Hg1124.2 (2)C5—C4—H4120.7
C6—N2—N2ii119.0 (3)C1—C5—C4117.9 (3)
C6—N2—H2A120.5C1—C5—C6122.1 (3)
N2ii—N2—H2A120.5C4—C5—C6119.9 (3)
N1—C1—C5123.3 (3)O1—C6—N2121.8 (3)
N1—C1—H1118.3O1—C6—C5122.4 (3)
C5—C1—H1118.3N2—C6—C5115.8 (2)
Cl1—Hg1—N1—C1−12.5 (2)C2—C3—C4—C52.1 (5)
Cl1i—Hg1—N1—C1−174.5 (2)N1—C1—C5—C41.1 (5)
N1i—Hg1—N1—C187.6 (2)N1—C1—C5—C6177.0 (3)
Cl1—Hg1—N1—C2172.4 (2)C3—C4—C5—C1−2.5 (5)
Cl1i—Hg1—N1—C210.4 (3)C3—C4—C5—C6−178.5 (3)
N1i—Hg1—N1—C2−87.6 (3)N2ii—N2—C6—O1−2.0 (5)
C2—N1—C1—C50.8 (5)N2ii—N2—C6—C5179.5 (3)
Hg1—N1—C1—C5−174.6 (2)C1—C5—C6—O1−147.0 (3)
C1—N1—C2—C3−1.3 (5)C4—C5—C6—O128.8 (4)
Hg1—N1—C2—C3173.8 (3)C1—C5—C6—N231.5 (4)
N1—C2—C3—C4−0.2 (5)C4—C5—C6—N2−152.7 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3···Cl1iii0.932.813.558 (4)138
N2—H2A···O1iv0.862.152.844 (3)137
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C3—H3⋯Cl1i0.932.813.558 (4)138
N2—H2A⋯O1ii0.862.152.844 (3)137

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  Microporous pillared paddle-wheel frameworks based on mixed-ligand coordination of zinc ions.

Authors:  Bao-Qing Ma; Karen L Mulfort; Joseph T Hupp
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Poly[[μ(2)-1,2-bis-(1H-imidazol-1-ylmeth-yl)benzene-κN:N](μ(2)-tereph-thalato-κO:O)zinc(II)].

Authors:  Shi-Shen Zhang; Li-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.