Literature DB >> 22589613

An approach for assessment of tumor volume from mammography in locally advanced breast cancer.

Gupreet Singh1, Sanjay Thulkar, Ashu Seith, Rajinder Parshad, Pratik Kumar.   

Abstract

Tumor size is an important independent indicator in patients with carcinoma of the breast. Repeated size measurements during primary systemic therapy produce detailed information about response that could be used to select the most effective treatment regimen and to estimate the patient's prognosis. Measurement of tumor burden with ultrasonography and computed tomography is being used with increasing frequency to assess the effectiveness of cytotoxic anticancer drugs. Standardization of assessment and results reporting are important steps that aim at increasing the amount of usable therapeutic information at the physician's disposal. The purpose of our study is to calculate the tumor volume by mammography after demagnification and compare the tumor volume measured from this method with ultrasonography volumes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mammography; locally advanced breast cancer; magnification; prognosis; tumor volume

Year:  2008        PMID: 22589613      PMCID: PMC3341896     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malays J Med Sci        ISSN: 1394-195X


  9 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer: a project of the Programme on Clinical Oncology of the International Union Against Cancer, Geneva, Switzerland.

Authors:  J L Hayward; P P Carbone; J C Heuson; S Kumaoka; A Segaloff; R D Rubens
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer.

Authors:  C G Moertel; J A Hanley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Ultrasonographic determination of the splenic size and its clinical usefulness in various liver diseases.

Authors:  T Koga; Y Morikawa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The cell proliferation kinetics of the EMT6/M/AC mouse tumour at four volumes during unperturbed growth in vivo.

Authors:  J V Watson
Journal:  Cell Tissue Kinet       Date:  1976-03

6.  Reporting results of cancer treatment.

Authors:  A B Miller; B Hoogstraten; M Staquet; A Winkler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Volume determinations using computed tomography.

Authors:  R S Breiman; J W Beck; M Korobkin; R Glenny; O E Akwari; D K Heaston; A V Moore; P C Ram
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Volume doubling measurement of spherical and ellipsoidal tumors.

Authors:  C P Spears
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1984

9.  [In vivo determination of tumor volume: what does a CT-based calculation mean in recurrences of rectal carcinoma?].

Authors:  H Aydin; E Richter; T Feyerabend; W Bohndorf
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.621

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Testicular ultrasound underestimates the size of small testicular masses: a radiologic-pathologic correlation study.

Authors:  Zeyad R Schwen; James L Liu; Andrew T Gabrielson; Hiten D Patel; Mohit Gupta; Steven P Rowe; Amin S Herati; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.