Literature DB >> 22589265

Timing and magnitude of initial change in disease activity score 28 predicts the likelihood of achieving low disease activity at 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol: a post-hoc analysis of the RAPID 1 trial.

Désirée van der Heijde1, Edward C Keystone, Jeffrey R Curtis, Robert B Landewé, Michael H Schiff, Dinesh Khanna, Tore K Kvien, Lucian Ionescu, Leon M Gervitz, Owen R Davies, Kristel Luijtens, Daniel E Furst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between timing and magnitude of Disease Activity Score [DAS28(ESR)] nonresponse (DAS28 improvement thresholds not reached) during the first 12 weeks of treatment with certolizumab pegol (CZP) plus methotrexate, and the likelihood of achieving low disease activity (LDA) at 1 year in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
METHODS: In a post-hoc analysis of the RAPID 1 study, patients achieving LDA [DAS28(ESR) ≤ 3.2] at Year 1 were assessed according to DAS28 nonresponse at various timepoints within the first 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Seven-hundred eighty-three patients were included (CZP 200 mg, n = 393; CZP 400 mg, n = 390). A total of 86.9% of patients in the CZP 200 mg group had a DAS28 improvement of ≥ 1.2 by Week 12. Of the 13.1% of patients with DAS28 improvement < 1.2 by Week 12, only 2.0% had LDA at Year 1. Failure to achieve LDA at Year 1 depended on timing of nonresponse - 22.3%, 8.4%, and 2.0% of patients with DAS28 improvement < 1.2 by Weeks 1, 6, and 12, respectively, had LDA at Year 1 - and magnitude of initial lack of DAS28 improvement; for example, compared with the patients with DAS28 < 1.2 improvement, fewer patients with DAS28 < 0.6 had LDA at Year 1 (17.4%, 2.4%, and 0.0% at Weeks 1, 6, and 12, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Failure to achieve improvement in DAS28 within the first 12 weeks of therapy was predictive of a low probability of achieving LDA at Year 1. Moreover, the accuracy of the prediction was found to be strongly dependent on the magnitude and timing of the lack of the response. (Clinical Trial Registration Nos. NCT00152386 and NCT00175877).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22589265     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.111171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  23 in total

Review 1.  Can Probiotic Supplements Improve Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Authors:  Annemarie Schorpion; Sharon L Kolasinski
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Determining the Minimally Important Difference in the Clinical Disease Activity Index for Improvement and Worsening in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

Authors:  J R Curtis; S Yang; L Chen; J E Pope; E C Keystone; B Haraoui; G Boire; J C Thorne; D Tin; C A Hitchon; C O Bingham; V P Bykerk
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Clinical response within 12 weeks as a predictor of future low disease activity in patients with early RA: results from the TEAR Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Theresa McVie; Ted R Mikuls; Richard J Reynolds; Iris Navarro-Millán; James O'Dell; Larry W Moreland; S Louis Bridges; Veena K Ranganath; Stacey S Cofield
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 4.  Certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for rheumatoid arthritis in adults.

Authors:  Vicente Ruiz Garcia; Amanda Burls; Juan B Cabello; Paloma Vela Casasempere; Sylvia Bort-Marti; José A Bernal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-08

5.  Defining response to TNF-inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: the negative impact of anti-TNF cycling and the need for a personalized medicine approach to identify primary non-responders.

Authors:  Keith J Johnson; Helia N Sanchez; Nancy Schoenbrunner
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  [S2e guideline: treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying drugs].

Authors:  C Fiehn; J Holle; C Iking-Konert; J Leipe; C Weseloh; M Frerix; R Alten; F Behrens; C Baerwald; J Braun; H Burkhardt; G Burmester; J Detert; M Gaubitz; A Gause; E Gromnica-Ihle; H Kellner; A Krause; J Kuipers; H-M Lorenz; U Müller-Ladner; M Nothacker; H Nüsslein; A Rubbert-Roth; M Schneider; H Schulze-Koops; S Seitz; H Sitter; C Specker; H-P Tony; S Wassenberg; J Wollenhaupt; K Krüger
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Trajectory of intensive treat-to-target disease modifying drug regimen in an observational study of an early rheumatoid arthritis cohort.

Authors:  Douglas White; Helen Pahau; Emily Duggan; Sanjoy Paul; Ranjeny Thomas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Certolizumab pegol: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Emma D Deeks
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 11.431

9.  Association of circulating miR-223 and miR-16 with disease activity in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Mária Filková; Borbala Aradi; Ladislav Senolt; Caroline Ospelt; Serena Vettori; Heřman Mann; Andrew Filer; Karim Raza; Christopher D Buckley; Martyn Snow; Jiří Vencovský; Karel Pavelka; Beat A Michel; Renate E Gay; Steffen Gay; Astrid Jüngel
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Twenty-eight-week results from the REALISTIC phase IIIb randomized trial: efficacy, safety and predictability of response to certolizumab pegol in a diverse rheumatoid arthritis population.

Authors:  Michael E Weinblatt; Roy Fleischmann; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Paul Emery; Tom W J Huizinga; Maurizio Cutolo; Désirée van der Heijde; Benjamin Duncan; Owen Davies; Kristel Luijtens; Maxime Dougados
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.