Literature DB >> 22588698

A model approach to project the start of egg laying of Great Tit (Parus major L.) in response to climate change.

Frank-M Chmielewski1, Klaus Blümel, Carina Scherbaum-Heberer, Bettina Koppmann-Rumpf, Karl-Heinz Schmidt.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to select a phenological model that is able to calculate the beginning of egg laying of Great Tit (Parus major) for both current and future climate conditions. Four models (M1-M4) were optimised on long-term phenological observations from the Ecological Research Centre Schlüchtern (Hessen/Germany). Model M1 was a common thermal time model that accumulates growing degree days (GDD) on an optimised starting date t (1). Since egg laying of Great Tit is influenced not only by air temperature but also by photoperiod, model M1 was extended by a daylength term to give M2. The other two models, M3 and M4, correspond to M1 and M2, but t (1) was intentionally set to 1 January, in order to consider already rising temperatures at the beginning of the year. A comparison of the four models led to following results: model M1 had a relatively high root mean square error at verification (RMSE(ver)) of more than 4 days and can be used only to calculate the start of egg laying for current climate conditions because of the relatively late starting date for GDD calculation. The model failed completely if the starting date was set to 1 January (M3). Consideration of a daylength term in models M2 and M4 improved the performance of both models strongly (RMSE(ver) of only 3 days or less), increased the credibility of parameter estimation, and was a precondition to calculate reliable projections in the timing of egg laying in birds for the future. These results confirm that the start of egg laying of Great Tit is influenced not only by air temperature, but also by photoperiod. Although models M2 and M4 both provide comparably good results for current climate conditions, we recommend model M4-with a starting date of temperature accumulation on 1 January-for calculating possible future shifts in the commencement of egg laying. Our regional projections in the start of egg laying, based on five regional climate models (RCMs: REMO-UBA, ECHAM5-CLM, HadCM3-CLM, WETTREG-0, WETTREG-1, GHG emission scenario A1B), indicate that in the near future (2011-2040) no significant change will take place. However, in the mid- (2041-2070) and long-term (2071-2100) range the beginning of egg laying could be advanced significantly by up to 11 days on average of all five RCMs. This result corresponds to the already observed shift in the timing of egg laying by about 1 week, due mainly to an abrupt increase in air temperature at the end of the 1980s by 1.2 K between April and May. The use of five regional climate scenarios additionally allowed to estimate uncertainties among the RCMs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22588698     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-012-0553-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  7 in total

1.  Climate change has affected the breeding date of tree swallows throughout North America

Authors: 
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Climate change is affecting altitudinal migrants and hibernating species.

Authors:  D W Inouye; B Barr; K B Armitage; B D Inouye
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Plant science. Phenology under global warming.

Authors:  Christian Körner; David Basler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Rapid advance of spring arrival dates in long-distance migratory birds.

Authors:  Niclas Jonzén; Andreas Lindén; Torbjørn Ergon; Endre Knudsen; Jon Olav Vik; Diego Rubolini; Dario Piacentini; Christian Brinch; Fernando Spina; Lennart Karlsson; Martin Stervander; Arne Andersson; Jonas Waldenström; Aleksi Lehikoinen; Erik Edvardsen; Rune Solvang; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology.

Authors:  M E Visser; L J Holleman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Spring phenology does not affect timing of reproduction in the great tit (Parus major).

Authors:  Sonja V Schaper; Carolina Rueda; Peter J Sharp; Alistair Dawson; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Long-term trend toward earlier breeding in an American bird: a response to global warming?

Authors:  J L Brown; S H Li; N Bhagabati
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  The rise of phenology with climate change: an evaluation of IJB publications.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Rong Yu
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Models for the beginning of sour cherry blossom.

Authors:  Philipp Matzneller; Klaus Blümel; Frank-M Chmielewski
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Extreme weather event in spring 2013 delayed breeding time of Great Tit and Blue Tit.

Authors:  Michał Glądalski; Mirosława Bańbura; Adam Kaliński; Marcin Markowski; Joanna Skwarska; Jarosław Wawrzyniak; Piotr Zieliński; Jerzy Bańbura
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Effects of extreme thermal conditions on plasticity in breeding phenology and double-broodedness of Great Tits and Blue Tits in central Poland in 2013 and 2014.

Authors:  Michał Glądalski; Mirosława Bańbura; Adam Kaliński; Marcin Markowski; Joanna Skwarska; Jarosław Wawrzyniak; Piotr Zieliński; Jerzy Bańbura
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Predicting climate-driven shifts in the breeding phenology of Varied Tits (Sittiparus various) in South Korean forests.

Authors:  Min-Su Jeong; Chang-Young Choi; Hankyu Kim; Woo-Shin Lee
Journal:  Anim Cells Syst (Seoul)       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 1.815

6.  Interspecific variation in the relationship between clutch size, laying date and intensity of urbanization in four species of hole-nesting birds.

Authors:  Marie Vaugoyeau; Frank Adriaensen; Alexandr Artemyev; Jerzy Bańbura; Emilio Barba; Clotilde Biard; Jacques Blondel; Zihad Bouslama; Jean-Charles Bouvier; Jordi Camprodon; Francesco Cecere; Anne Charmantier; Motti Charter; Mariusz Cichoń; Camillo Cusimano; Dorota Czeszczewik; Virginie Demeyrier; Blandine Doligez; Claire Doutrelant; Anna Dubiec; Marcel Eens; Tapio Eeva; Bruno Faivre; Peter N Ferns; Jukka T Forsman; Eduardo García-Del-Rey; Aya Goldshtein; Anne E Goodenough; Andrew G Gosler; Arnaud Grégoire; Lars Gustafsson; Iga Harnist; Ian R Hartley; Philipp Heeb; Shelley A Hinsley; Paul Isenmann; Staffan Jacob; Rimvydas Juškaitis; Erkki Korpimäki; Indrikis Krams; Toni Laaksonen; Marcel M Lambrechts; Bernard Leclercq; Esa Lehikoinen; Olli Loukola; Arne Lundberg; Mark C Mainwaring; Raivo Mänd; Bruno Massa; Tomasz D Mazgajski; Santiago Merino; Cezary Mitrus; Mikko Mönkkönen; Xavier Morin; Ruedi G Nager; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Sven G Nilsson; Ana C Norte; Markku Orell; Philippe Perret; Christopher M Perrins; Carla S Pimentel; Rianne Pinxten; Heinz Richner; Hugo Robles; Seppo Rytkönen; Juan Carlos Senar; Janne T Seppänen; Luis Pascoal da Silva; Tore Slagsvold; Tapio Solonen; Alberto Sorace; Martyn J Stenning; Piotr Tryjanowski; Mikael von Numers; Wieslaw Walankiewicz; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.