Literature DB >> 22588641

An introduction to parasitic wasps of Drosophila and the antiparasite immune response.

Chiyedza Small1, Indira Paddibhatla, Roma Rajwani, Shubha Govind.   

Abstract

Most known parasitoid wasp species attack the larval or pupal stages of Drosophila. While Trichopria drosophilae infect the pupal stages of the host (Fig. 1A-C), females of the genus Leptopilina (Fig. 1D, 1F, 1G) and Ganaspis (Fig. 1E) attack the larval stages. We use these parasites to study the molecular basis of a biological arms race. Parasitic wasps have tremendous value as biocontrol agents. Most of them carry virulence and other factors that modify host physiology and immunity. Analysis of Drosophila wasps is providing insights into how species-specific interactions shape the genetic structures of natural communities. These studies also serve as a model for understanding the hosts' immune physiology and how coordinated immune reactions are thwarted by this class of parasites. The larval/pupal cuticle serves as the first line of defense. The wasp ovipositor is a sharp needle-like structure that efficiently delivers eggs into the host hemocoel. Oviposition is followed by a wound healing reaction at the cuticle (Fig. 1C, arrowheads). Some wasps can insert two or more eggs into the same host, although the development of only one egg succeeds. Supernumerary eggs or developing larvae are eliminated by a process that is not yet understood. These wasps are therefore referred to as solitary parasitoids. Depending on the fly strain and the wasp species, the wasp egg has one of two fates. It is either encapsulated, so that its development is blocked (host emerges; Fig. 2 left); or the wasp egg hatches, develops, molts, and grows into an adult (wasp emerges; Fig. 2 right). L. heterotoma is one of the best-studied species of Drosophila parasitic wasps. It is a "generalist," which means that it can utilize most Drosophila species as hosts. L. heterotoma and L. victoriae are sister species and they produce virus-like particles that actively interfere with the encapsulation response. Unlike L. heterotoma, L. boulardi is a specialist parasite and the range of Drosophila species it utilizes is relatively limited. Strains of L. boulardi also produce virus-like particles although they differ significantly in their ability to succeed on D. melanogaster. Some of these L. boulardi strains are difficult to grow on D. melanogaster as the fly host frequently succeeds in encapsulating their eggs. Thus, it is important to have the knowledge of both partners in specific experimental protocols. In addition to barrier tissues (cuticle, gut and trachea), Drosophila larvae have systemic cellular and humoral immune responses that arise from functions of blood cells and the fat body, respectively. Oviposition by L. boulardi activates both immune arms. Blood cells are found in circulation, in sessile populations under the segmented cuticle, and in the lymph gland. The lymph gland is a small hematopoietic organ on the dorsal side of the larva. Clusters of hematopoietic cells, called lobes, are arranged segmentally in pairs along the dorsal vessel that runs along the anterior-posterior axis of the animal (Fig. 3A). The fat body is a large multifunctional organ (Fig. 3B). It secretes antimicrobial peptides in response to microbial and metazoan infections. Wasp infection activates immune signaling (Fig. 4). At the cellular level, it triggers division and differentiation of blood cells. In self defense, aggregates and capsules develop in the hemocoel of infected animals (Fig. 5). Activated blood cells migrate toward the wasp egg (or wasp larva) and begin to form a capsule around it (Fig. 5A-F). Some blood cells aggregate to form nodules (Fig. 5G-H). Careful analysis reveals that wasp infection induces the anterior-most lymph gland lobes to disperse at their peripheries (Fig. 6C, D). We present representative data with Toll signal transduction pathway components Dorsal and Spätzle (Figs. 4,5,7), and its target Drosomycin (Fig. 6), to illustrate how specific changes in the lymph gland and hemocoel can be studied after wasp infection. The dissection protocols described here also yield the wasp eggs (or developing stages of wasps) from the host hemolymph (Fig. 8).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22588641      PMCID: PMC3466936          DOI: 10.3791/3347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  18 in total

1.  Cellular immune response to parasite infection in the Drosophila lymph gland is developmentally regulated.

Authors:  Richard Paul Sorrentino; Yves Carton; Shubha Govind
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Identification and immuno-electron microscopy localization of p40, a protein component of immunosuppressive virus-like particles from Leptopilina heterotoma, a virulent parasitoid wasp of Drosophila.

Authors:  Hsiling Chiu; Jorge Morales; Shubha Govind
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 3.  The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Bruno Lemaitre; Jules Hoffmann
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 28.527

4.  A drosomycin-GFP reporter transgene reveals a local immune response in Drosophila that is not dependent on the Toll pathway.

Authors:  D Ferrandon; A C Jung; M Criqui; B Lemaitre; S Uttenweiler-Joseph; L Michaut; J Reichhart; J A Hoffmann
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-08-10       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  VLPs of Leptopilina boulardi share biogenesis and overall stellate morphology with VLPs of the heterotoma clade.

Authors:  Gwenaelle Gueguen; Roma Rajwani; Indira Paddibhatla; Jorge Morales; Shubha Govind
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.303

6.  The Drosophila lymph gland as a developmental model of hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Seung-Hye Jung; Cory J Evans; Christine Uemura; Utpal Banerjee
Journal:  Development       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Biogenesis, structure, and immune-suppressive effects of virus-like particles of a Drosophila parasitoid, Leptopilina victoriae.

Authors:  Jorge Morales; Hsiling Chiu; Thiri Oo; Rosemary Plaza; Sally Hoskins; Shubha Govind
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.354

8.  The PDGF/VEGF receptor controls blood cell survival in Drosophila.

Authors:  Katja Brückner; Lutz Kockel; Peter Duchek; Carlos M Luque; Pernille Rørth; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  Hemolymph-dependent and -independent responses in Drosophila immune tissue.

Authors:  Raul Bettencourt; H Asha; Charles Dearolf; Y Tony Ip
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 4.429

10.  Developmental analysis of Ganaspis xanthopoda, a larval parasitoid of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J P Melk; S Govind
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  20 in total

1.  Alcohol resistance in Drosophila is modulated by the Toll innate immune pathway.

Authors:  B R Troutwine; A Ghezzi; A Z Pietrzykowski; N S Atkinson
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.449

2.  Harnessing the natural Drosophila-parasitoid model for integrating insect immunity with functional venomics.

Authors:  Mary E Heavner; Adam D Hudgins; Roma Rajwani; Jorge Morales; Shubha Govind
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.186

3.  Methods to Examine the Lymph Gland and Hemocytes in Drosophila Larvae.

Authors:  Theresa A Reimels; Cathie M Pfleger
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  The matrix protein Tiggrin regulates plasmatocyte maturation in Drosophila larva.

Authors:  Chen U Zhang; Ken M Cadigan
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Discovery of aspirin-triggered eicosanoid-like mediators in a Drosophila metainflammation blood tumor model.

Authors:  Silvio Panettieri; Indira Paddibhatla; Jennifer Chou; Roma Rajwani; Rebecca S Moore; Tamara Goncharuk; George John; Shubha Govind
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 6.  Drosophila hematopoiesis: Markers and methods for molecular genetic analysis.

Authors:  Cory J Evans; Ting Liu; Utpal Banerjee
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  A comparative cytogenetic study of Drosophila parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) using DNA-binding fluorochromes and FISH with 45S rDNA probe.

Authors:  Vladimir E Gokhman; Nadezhda L Bolsheva; Shubha Govind; Olga V Muravenko
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 8.  Macrophages and cellular immunity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Katrina S Gold; Katja Brückner
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 11.130

9.  Hedgehog signaling from the Posterior Signaling Center maintains U-shaped expression and a prohemocyte population in Drosophila.

Authors:  Rajkumar Baldeosingh; Hongjuan Gao; Xiaorong Wu; Nancy Fossett
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  A parasitoid wasp of Drosophila employs preemptive and reactive strategies to deplete its host's blood cells.

Authors:  Johnny R Ramroop; Mary Ellen Heavner; Zubaidul H Razzak; Shubha Govind
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.