PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability of quantitative ultrasonic measurement of renal allograft elasticity using supersonic shear imaging (SSI) and its relationship with parenchymal pathological changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three kidney transplant recipients (22 women, 21 men) (mean age, 51 years; age range, 18-70 years) underwent SSI elastography, followed by biopsy. The quantitative measurements of cortical elasticity were performed by two radiologists and expressed in terms of Young's modulus (kPa). Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was assessed (Kruskal-Wallis test and Bland-Altman analysis), as well as the correlation between elasticity values and clinical, biological and pathological data (semi-quantitative Banff scoring). Interstitial fibrosis was evaluated semi-quantitatively by the Banff score and measured by quantitative image analysis. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer variation coefficients of cortical elasticity were 20 % and 12 %, respectively. Renal cortical stiffness did not correlate with any clinical parameters, any single semi-quantitative Banff score or the level of interstitial fibrosis; however, a significant correlation was observed between cortical stiffness and the total Banff scores of chronic lesions and of all elementary lesions (R = 0.34, P = 0.05 and R = 0.41, P = 0.03,respectively). CONCLUSION: Quantitative measurement of renal cortical stiffness using SSI is a promising non-invasive tool to evaluate global histological deterioration. KEY POINTS : • Supersonic shear imaging elastography can measure cortical stiffness in renal transplants • The level of cortical stiffness is correlated with the global degree of tissue lesions • The global histological deterioration of transplanted kidneys can be quantified using elastography.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability of quantitative ultrasonic measurement of renal allograft elasticity using supersonic shear imaging (SSI) and its relationship with parenchymal pathological changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three kidney transplant recipients (22 women, 21 men) (mean age, 51 years; age range, 18-70 years) underwent SSI elastography, followed by biopsy. The quantitative measurements of cortical elasticity were performed by two radiologists and expressed in terms of Young's modulus (kPa). Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was assessed (Kruskal-Wallis test and Bland-Altman analysis), as well as the correlation between elasticity values and clinical, biological and pathological data (semi-quantitative Banff scoring). Interstitial fibrosis was evaluated semi-quantitatively by the Banff score and measured by quantitative image analysis. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer variation coefficients of cortical elasticity were 20 % and 12 %, respectively. Renal cortical stiffness did not correlate with any clinical parameters, any single semi-quantitative Banff score or the level of interstitial fibrosis; however, a significant correlation was observed between cortical stiffness and the total Banff scores of chronic lesions and of all elementary lesions (R = 0.34, P = 0.05 and R = 0.41, P = 0.03,respectively). CONCLUSION: Quantitative measurement of renal cortical stiffness using SSI is a promising non-invasive tool to evaluate global histological deterioration. KEY POINTS : • Supersonic shear imaging elastography can measure cortical stiffness in renal transplants • The level of cortical stiffness is correlated with the global degree of tissue lesions • The global histological deterioration of transplanted kidneys can be quantified using elastography.
Authors: Trygve Syversveen; Knut Brabrand; Karsten Midtvedt; Erik H Strøm; Anders Hartmann; Jarl A Jakobsen; Audun E Berstad Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2010-09-02 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Robert Arndt; Sven Schmidt; Christoph Loddenkemper; Maria Grünbaum; Walter Zidek; Markus van der Giet; Timm H Westhoff Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: B Sis; M Mengel; M Haas; R B Colvin; P F Halloran; L C Racusen; K Solez; W M Baldwin; E R Bracamonte; V Broecker; F Cosio; A J Demetris; C Drachenberg; G Einecke; J Gloor; D Glotz; E Kraus; C Legendre; H Liapis; R B Mannon; B J Nankivell; V Nickeleit; J C Papadimitriou; P Randhawa; H Regele; K Renaudin; E R Rodriguez; D Seron; S Seshan; M Suthanthiran; B A Wasowska; A Zachary; A Zeevi Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2010-01-29 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Brian J Nankivell; Richard J Borrows; Caroline L-S Fung; Philip J O'Connell; Richard D M Allen; Jeremy R Chapman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-12-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Katrin Wunder; Susanne Kriener; Fariba Sotoudeh; Swantje Richter; Joerg Bojunga; Eva Herrmann; Thierry Poynard; Christoph F Dietrich; Johannes Vermehren; Stefan Zeuzem; Christoph Sarrazin Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: A J Matas; K J Gillingham; A Humar; R Kandaswamy; D E R Sutherland; W D Payne; T B Dunn; J S Najarian Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Qinxue Sun; Maike Baues; Barbara M Klinkhammer; Josef Ehling; Sonja Djudjaj; Natascha I Drude; Christoph Daniel; Kerstin Amann; Rafael Kramann; Hyojin Kim; Julio Saez-Rodriguez; Ralf Weiskirchen; David C Onthank; Rene M Botnar; Fabian Kiessling; Jürgen Floege; Twan Lammers; Peter Boor Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 17.956