RATIONALE: Marijuana is believed to increase impulsivity and risk taking, but the processes whereby it affects such behaviors are not understood. Indeed, either the pharmacologic effect of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or the expectancy of receiving it may lead to deficits in cognitive processing and increases in risk taking. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We examined the relative effects of expecting to receive active marijuana and the pharmacological drug effects using a balanced placebo design. Young adult regular marijuana users (N = 136) were randomly assigned into one of four groups in a two × two instructional set (Told THC vs. Told no THC) by drug administration (smoked marijuana with 2.8 % THC vs. placebo) design. Dependent measures included subjective intoxication, behavioral impulsivity, and decision-making related to risky behaviors. RESULTS:Active THC, regardless of expectancy, impaired inhibition on the Stop Signal and Stroop Color-Word tasks. Expectancy of having smoked THC, regardless of active drug, decreased impulsive decision-making on a delay discounting task among participants reporting no deception and increased perception of sexual risk among women, consistent with a compensatory effect. Expectancy of smoking THC in combination with active THC increased negative perceptions from risky alcohol use. Active drug and expectancy independently increased subjective intoxication. CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight the importance of marijuana expectancy effects as users believing they are smoking marijuana may compensate for expected intoxication effects when engaged in deliberate decision-making by making less impulsive and risky decisions. Effects of marijuana on impulsive disinhibition, by contrast, reflect direct pharmacologic effects for which participants did not compensate.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Marijuana is believed to increase impulsivity and risk taking, but the processes whereby it affects such behaviors are not understood. Indeed, either the pharmacologic effect of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or the expectancy of receiving it may lead to deficits in cognitive processing and increases in risk taking. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We examined the relative effects of expecting to receive active marijuana and the pharmacological drug effects using a balanced placebo design. Young adult regular marijuana users (N = 136) were randomly assigned into one of four groups in a two × two instructional set (Told THC vs. Told no THC) by drug administration (smoked marijuana with 2.8 % THC vs. placebo) design. Dependent measures included subjective intoxication, behavioral impulsivity, and decision-making related to risky behaviors. RESULTS: Active THC, regardless of expectancy, impaired inhibition on the Stop Signal and Stroop Color-Word tasks. Expectancy of having smoked THC, regardless of active drug, decreased impulsive decision-making on a delay discounting task among participants reporting no deception and increased perception of sexual risk among women, consistent with a compensatory effect. Expectancy of smoking THC in combination with active THC increased negative perceptions from risky alcohol use. Active drug and expectancy independently increased subjective intoxication. CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight the importance of marijuana expectancy effects as users believing they are smoking marijuana may compensate for expected intoxication effects when engaged in deliberate decision-making by making less impulsive and risky decisions. Effects of marijuana on impulsive disinhibition, by contrast, reflect direct pharmacologic effects for which participants did not compensate.
Authors: C W Lejuez; Jennifer P Read; Christopher W Kahler; Jerry B Richards; Susan E Ramsey; Gregory L Stuart; David R Strong; Richard A Brown Journal: J Exp Psychol Appl Date: 2002-06
Authors: Scott D Lane; Don R Cherek; Oleg V Tcheremissine; Lori M Lieving; Cythia J Pietras Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Nehal P Vadhan; Carl L Hart; Wilfred G van Gorp; Erik W Gunderson; Margaret Haney; Richard W Foltin Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: L Cinnamon Bidwell; Jarrod M Ellingson; Hollis C Karoly; Sophie L YorkWilliams; Leah N Hitchcock; Brian L Tracy; Jost Klawitter; Cristina Sempio; Angela D Bryan; Kent E Hutchison Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Brandon J George; Peng Li; Harris R Lieberman; Greg Pavela; Andrew W Brown; Kevin R Fontaine; Madeline M Jeansonne; Gareth R Dutton; Adeniyi J Idigo; Mariel A Parman; Donald B Rubin; David B Allison Journal: Psychol Methods Date: 2017-04-13
Authors: L Cinnamon Bidwell; Jane Metrik; John McGeary; Rohan H C Palmer; S Francazio; Valerie S Knopik Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Jane Metrik; Rachel L Gunn; Kristina M Jackson; Alexander W Sokolovsky; Brian Borsari Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Tiarney D Ritchwood; Jamie DeCoster; Isha W Metzger; John M Bolland; Carla K Danielson Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2016-04-09 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Rachel L Gunn; Alyssa L Norris; Alexander Sokolovsky; Lauren Micalizzi; Jennifer E Merrill; Nancy P Barnett Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2018-10-25