Literature DB >> 22588214

Interpreting variability in population biomonitoring data: role of elimination kinetics.

Lesa L Aylward1, Chris R Kirman, John L Adgate, Lisa M McKenzie, Sean M Hays.   

Abstract

Biomarker concentrations in spot samples of blood and urine are implicitly interpreted as direct surrogates for long-term exposure magnitude in a variety of contexts including (1) epidemiological studies of potential health outcomes associated with general population chemical exposure, and (2) cross-sectional population biomonitoring studies. However, numerous factors in addition to exposure magnitude influence biomarker concentrations in spot samples, including temporal variation in spot samples because of elimination kinetics. The influence of half-life of elimination relative to exposure interval is examined here using simple first-order pharmacokinetic simulations of urinary concentrations in spot samples collected at random times relative to exposure events. Repeated exposures were modeled for each individual in the simulation with exposure amounts drawn from lognormal distributions with varying geometric standard deviations. Relative variation in predicted spot sample concentrations was greater than the variation in underlying dose distributions when the half-life of elimination was shorter than the interval between exposures, with the degree of relative variation increasing as the ratio of half-life to exposure interval decreased. Results of the modeling agreed well with data from a serial urine collection data set from the Centers for Disease Control. Data from previous studies examining intra-class correlation coefficients for a range of chemicals relying upon repeated sampling support the importance of considering the half-life relative to exposure frequency in design and interpretation of studies using spot samples for exposure classification and exposure estimation. The modeling and data sets presented here provide tools that can assist in interpretation of variability in cross-sectional biomonitoring studies and in design of studies utilizing biomonitoring data as markers for exposure.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22588214     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2012.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  15 in total

1.  Consensus Modeling of Median Chemical Intake for the U.S. Population Based on Predictions of Exposure Pathways.

Authors:  Caroline L Ring; Jon A Arnot; Deborah H Bennett; Peter P Egeghy; Peter Fantke; Lei Huang; Kristin K Isaacs; Olivier Jolliet; Katherine A Phillips; Paul S Price; Hyeong-Moo Shin; John N Westgate; R Woodrow Setzer; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Bayesian inference of chemical exposures from NHANES urine biomonitoring data.

Authors:  Zachary Stanfield; R Woodrow Setzer; Victoria Hull; Risa R Sayre; Kristin K Isaacs; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.371

3.  Use of pooled samples to assess human exposure to parabens, benzophenone-3 and triclosan in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  A L Heffernan; C Baduel; L M L Toms; A M Calafat; X Ye; P Hobson; S Broomhall; J F Mueller
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Metabolism of benzo(a)pyrene by aortic subcellular fractions in the setting of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  A Ramesh; P A Prins; P R Perati; P V Rekhadevi; U K Sampson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Quality assurance and harmonization for targeted biomonitoring measurements of environmental organic chemicals across the Children's Health Exposure Analysis Resource laboratory network.

Authors:  Kurunthachalam Kannan; Alexa Stathis; Matthew J Mazzella; Syam S Andra; Dana Boyd Barr; Stephen S Hecht; Lori S Merrill; Aubrey L Galusha; Patrick J Parsons
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.840

6.  Evaluation of biomonitoring data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a risk assessment context: perspectives across chemicals.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Christopher R Kirman; Rita Schoeny; Christopher J Portier; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Urinary phthalate metabolites are associated with body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese school children.

Authors:  Hexing Wang; Ying Zhou; Chuanxi Tang; Yanhong He; Jingui Wu; Yue Chen; Qingwu Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Validation of an aggregate exposure model for substances in consumer products: a case study of diethyl phthalate in personal care products.

Authors:  Christiaan Delmaar; Bas Bokkers; Wouter ter Burg; Gerlienke Schuur
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.563

9.  Variation in urinary flow rates according to demographic characteristics and body mass index in NHANES: potential confounding of associations between health outcomes and urinary biomarker concentrations.

Authors:  Sean M Hays; Lesa L Aylward; Benjamin C Blount
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Within-person reproducibility of urinary bisphenol A and phthalate metabolites over a 1 to 3 year period among women in the Nurses' Health Studies: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mary K Townsend; Adrian A Franke; Xingnan Li; Frank B Hu; A Heather Eliassen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.