INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with intravaginal devices is an alternative to surgical management, but data of a high level of evidence remain scarce. Our goal was to assess efficacy, tolerance, and acceptability of the 75NC007 intravaginal device for SUI management. METHODS: A phase III, multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted. After an initial washout period with no treatment, allowing baseline evaluation, women with SUI were randomly assigned to a treatment or control group (no treatment). The primary endpoint was the reduction of incontinence episode frequency (IEF), according to bladder diaries, as compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints were variation of the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) score, of 24-h pad test, and of CONTILIFE questionnaire scores as compared to baseline. Intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were conducted. RESULTS:Fifty-five patients were enrolled and analyzed (26 controls and 29 treated). The mean relative variations of IEF, SUI USP subscore, and overactive bladder (OAB) USP subscore were more significant in the treatment group than in the control group (-31.7 ± 65.1 % vs -7.6 ± 24.5 %, p = 0.002, -2.4 ± 2.6 vs 0.2 ± 2.2, p = 0.004, and -1.5 ± 2.8 vs 0.2 ± 1.8, p = 0.016, respectively). The dysuria USP subscore was slightly decreased in the treatment group. CONTILIFE scores were slightly improved in the treatment group. Pad test variations were not different between groups. No serious adverse event was noted throughout the entire study. CONCLUSIONS: The 75NC007 intravaginal device is a safe and effective noninvasive treatment of SUI in women.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with intravaginal devices is an alternative to surgical management, but data of a high level of evidence remain scarce. Our goal was to assess efficacy, tolerance, and acceptability of the 75NC007 intravaginal device for SUI management. METHODS: A phase III, multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted. After an initial washout period with no treatment, allowing baseline evaluation, women with SUI were randomly assigned to a treatment or control group (no treatment). The primary endpoint was the reduction of incontinence episode frequency (IEF), according to bladder diaries, as compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints were variation of the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) score, of 24-h pad test, and of CONTILIFE questionnaire scores as compared to baseline. Intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled and analyzed (26 controls and 29 treated). The mean relative variations of IEF, SUI USP subscore, and overactive bladder (OAB) USP subscore were more significant in the treatment group than in the control group (-31.7 ± 65.1 % vs -7.6 ± 24.5 %, p = 0.002, -2.4 ± 2.6 vs 0.2 ± 2.2, p = 0.004, and -1.5 ± 2.8 vs 0.2 ± 1.8, p = 0.016, respectively). The dysuria USP subscore was slightly decreased in the treatment group. CONTILIFE scores were slightly improved in the treatment group. Pad test variations were not different between groups. No serious adverse event was noted throughout the entire study. CONCLUSIONS: The 75NC007 intravaginal device is a safe and effective noninvasive treatment of SUI in women.
Authors: Scot H Simpson; Dean T Eurich; Sumit R Majumdar; Rajdeep S Padwal; Ross T Tsuyuki; Janice Varney; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-06-21
Authors: Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Matthew D Barber; Christopher R Chapple; Elisabetta Costantini; Vincenzo Ficarra; Paul Hilton; Carl G Nilsson; David Waltregny Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-04-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Yuko M Komesu; Loren H Ketai; Rebecca G Rogers; Steven C Eberhardt; Jennifer Pohl Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Nancy H Fultz; Kathryn Burgio; Ananias C Diokno; Kraig S Kinchen; Robert Obenchain; Richard C Bump Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Philip van Kerrebroeck; Paul Abrams; Rainer Lange; Mark Slack; Jean-Jacques Wyndaele; Ilker Yalcin; Richard C Bump Journal: BJOG Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Karin S Coyne; Alan J Wein; Andrea Tubaro; Chris C Sexton; Christine L Thompson; Zoe S Kopp; Lalitha P Aiyer Journal: BJU Int Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Katherine Corsi; Amanda Mogul; Thomas A Trikalinos; Peter C Jeppson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Gerhard H Te Brummelstroete; Anne M Loohuis; Nienke J Wessels; Henriëtte C Westers; Jojanneke J G T van Summeren; Marco H Blanker Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Hayser Medina Lucena; Kate Williams; Douglas G Tincello; Allyson Lipp; Chris Shaw Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 2.894