Literature DB >> 22588140

75NC007 device for noninvasive stress urinary incontinence management in women: a randomized controlled trial.

Jean-Nicolas Cornu1, Stéphane Mouly, Gérard Amarenco, Bernard Jacquetin, Calin Ciofu, Francois Haab.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with intravaginal devices is an alternative to surgical management, but data of a high level of evidence remain scarce. Our goal was to assess efficacy, tolerance, and acceptability of the 75NC007 intravaginal device for SUI management.
METHODS: A phase III, multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted. After an initial washout period with no treatment, allowing baseline evaluation, women with SUI were randomly assigned to a treatment or control group (no treatment). The primary endpoint was the reduction of incontinence episode frequency (IEF), according to bladder diaries, as compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints were variation of the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) score, of 24-h pad test, and of CONTILIFE questionnaire scores as compared to baseline. Intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled and analyzed (26 controls and 29 treated). The mean relative variations of IEF, SUI USP subscore, and overactive bladder (OAB) USP subscore were more significant in the treatment group than in the control group (-31.7 ± 65.1 % vs -7.6 ± 24.5 %, p = 0.002, -2.4 ± 2.6 vs 0.2 ± 2.2, p = 0.004, and -1.5 ± 2.8 vs 0.2 ± 1.8, p = 0.016, respectively). The dysuria USP subscore was slightly decreased in the treatment group. CONTILIFE scores were slightly improved in the treatment group. Pad test variations were not different between groups. No serious adverse event was noted throughout the entire study.
CONCLUSIONS: The 75NC007 intravaginal device is a safe and effective noninvasive treatment of SUI in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22588140     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1814-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  22 in total

Review 1.  A meta-analysis of the association between adherence to drug therapy and mortality.

Authors:  Scot H Simpson; Dean T Eurich; Sumit R Majumdar; Rajdeep S Padwal; Ross T Tsuyuki; Janice Varney; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-21

Review 2.  Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Matthew D Barber; Christopher R Chapple; Elisabetta Costantini; Vincenzo Ficarra; Paul Hilton; Carl G Nilsson; David Waltregny
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Pharmacological treatment of women awaiting surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Linda Cardozo; Harold P Drutz; Simin K Baygani; Richard C Bump
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Restoration of continence by pessaries: magnetic resonance imaging assessment of mechanism of action.

Authors:  Yuko M Komesu; Loren H Ketai; Rebecca G Rogers; Steven C Eberhardt; Jennifer Pohl
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Burden of stress urinary incontinence for community-dwelling women.

Authors:  Nancy H Fultz; Kathryn Burgio; Ananias C Diokno; Kraig S Kinchen; Robert Obenchain; Richard C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Effectiveness of a new self-positioning pessary for the management of urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Scott A Farrell; Sandra Baydock; Baharak Amir; Cora Fanning
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of European and Canadian women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Philip van Kerrebroeck; Paul Abrams; Rainer Lange; Mark Slack; Jean-Jacques Wyndaele; Ilker Yalcin; Richard C Bump
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Vaginal pessaries for the management of stress and mixed urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Melanie J Donnelly; Stephanie Powell-Morgan; Ambre L Olsen; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-08-05

9.  Prevention of exercise incontinence with mechanical devices.

Authors:  I Nygaard
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  The burden of lower urinary tract symptoms: evaluating the effect of LUTS on health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression: EpiLUTS.

Authors:  Karin S Coyne; Alan J Wein; Andrea Tubaro; Chris C Sexton; Christine L Thompson; Zoe S Kopp; Lalitha P Aiyer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  7 in total

1.  Adverse Events Associated with Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Women: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Katherine Corsi; Amanda Mogul; Thomas A Trikalinos; Peter C Jeppson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Mechanical devices for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Allyson Lipp; Christine Shaw; Karin Glavind
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-17

Review 3.  Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.

Authors:  Alex Todhunter-Brown; Christine Hazelton; Pauline Campbell; Andrew Elders; Suzanne Hagen; Doreen McClurg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-02

4.  Compliance with Uresta (CURE) study; a 12 month follow-up of 40 women.

Authors:  Patrick Campbell; Kayleigh Moran; Sinead Boyle; Caroline Gallagher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 1.932

5.  Vaginal Pessaries for Pelvic Organ Prolapse or Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2021-05-06

6.  Scientific evidence for pelvic floor devices presented at conferences: An overview.

Authors:  Gerhard H Te Brummelstroete; Anne M Loohuis; Nienke J Wessels; Henriëtte C Westers; Jojanneke J G T van Summeren; Marco H Blanker
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  Evaluation of the IncoStress device for urinary incontinence: a feasibility study and pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hayser Medina Lucena; Kate Williams; Douglas G Tincello; Allyson Lipp; Chris Shaw
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.