BACKGROUND: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is an emerging method for in-vivo imaging of the gastrointestinal tract and requires a contrast agent. Fluorescein is the most commonly used agent. The optimal dose of fluorescein for pCLE in colon is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Exploration of optimal dose of fluorescein for pCLE in colon. DESIGN: Comparative, prospective pilot trail. SETTING: Tertiary-care center. PATIENTS: 18 participants underwent colonoscopy without complications. INTERVENTIONS: pCLE videos were recorded in normal cecum, using 10% fluorescein intravenously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: For subjective analysis, pCLE videos were scored for quality, by 2 observers, independently and blinded to fluorescein dose. For objective analysis, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were calculated for each video by an expert. RESULTS: 6 fluorescein doses were used, including 0.5 mL, 1 mL, 2.5 mL, 5 mL, 7.5 mL and 10 mL and each dose was used in three patients. For each dose, median image quality score was 2.5, 2.0, 3.25, 4.0, 4.0 and 3.5 by first observer and 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 4.0 and 4.0 by second observer, respectively. The subjective quality scores increased from 0.5 mL to 5.0 mL, with no evidence of further improved quality at 7.5 mL and 10 mL doses. SNR were not significantly different between doses but trended higher for higher doses. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. The results can not be applied to other parts of gastrointestinal tract i.e. duodenum, esophagus with different blood supply. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that the optimal dose of fluorescein for high quality pCLE imaging in colon is approximately 5.0 mL.
BACKGROUND: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is an emerging method for in-vivo imaging of the gastrointestinal tract and requires a contrast agent. Fluorescein is the most commonly used agent. The optimal dose of fluorescein for pCLE in colon is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Exploration of optimal dose of fluorescein for pCLE in colon. DESIGN: Comparative, prospective pilot trail. SETTING: Tertiary-care center. PATIENTS: 18 participants underwent colonoscopy without complications. INTERVENTIONS:pCLE videos were recorded in normal cecum, using 10% fluorescein intravenously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: For subjective analysis, pCLE videos were scored for quality, by 2 observers, independently and blinded to fluorescein dose. For objective analysis, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were calculated for each video by an expert. RESULTS: 6 fluorescein doses were used, including 0.5 mL, 1 mL, 2.5 mL, 5 mL, 7.5 mL and 10 mL and each dose was used in three patients. For each dose, median image quality score was 2.5, 2.0, 3.25, 4.0, 4.0 and 3.5 by first observer and 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 4.0 and 4.0 by second observer, respectively. The subjective quality scores increased from 0.5 mL to 5.0 mL, with no evidence of further improved quality at 7.5 mL and 10 mL doses. SNR were not significantly different between doses but trended higher for higher doses. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. The results can not be applied to other parts of gastrointestinal tract i.e. duodenum, esophagus with different blood supply. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that the optimal dose of fluorescein for high quality pCLE imaging in colon is approximately 5.0 mL.
Authors: Ralf Kiesslich; Liebwin Gossner; Martin Goetz; Alexandra Dahlmann; Michael Vieth; Manfred Stolte; Arthur Hoffman; Michael Jung; Bernhard Nafe; Peter R Galle; Markus F Neurath Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: A Zambelli; V Villanacci; E Buscarini; G Lupinacci; F De Grazia; G Brambilla; F Menozzi; L La Mantia; G Bassotti Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Ralf Kiesslich; Martin Goetz; Katharina Lammersdorf; Constantin Schneider; Juergen Burg; Manfred Stolte; Michael Vieth; Bernhard Nafe; Peter R Galle; Markus F Neurath Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Ralf Kiesslich; Juergen Burg; Michael Vieth; Janina Gnaendiger; Meike Enders; Peter Delaney; Adrian Polglase; Wendy McLaren; Daniela Janell; Steven Thomas; Bernhard Nafe; Peter R Galle; Markus F Neurath Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Mazen R Al-Mansour; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Brian R Davis; Abdulrahim Alawashez; Salvatore Docimo; Alia Qureshi; Shawn Tsuda Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Hsiang-Chieh Lee; Osman O Ahsen; Kaicheng Liang; Zhao Wang; Marisa Figueiredo; Michael G Giacomelli; Benjamin Potsaid; Qin Huang; Hiroshi Mashimo; James G Fujimoto Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2017-02-05 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Philippa Meershoek; Gijs H KleinJan; Danny M van Willigen; Kevin P Bauwens; Silvia J Spa; Florian van Beurden; Erik J van Gennep; Alexandre M Mottrie; Henk G van der Poel; T Buckle; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Matthias N van Oosterom Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2020-11-11