Literature DB >> 22586123

Higher-order motion sensitivity in fly visual circuits.

Yu-Jen Lee1, Karin Nordström.   

Abstract

In higher-order motion stimuli, the direction of object motion does not follow the direction of luminance change. Such stimuli could be generated by the wing movements of a flying butterfly and further complicated by its motion in and out of shadows. Human subjects readily perceive the direction of higher-order motion, although this stands in stark contrast to prevailing motion vision models. Flies and humans compute motion in similar ways, and because flies behaviorally track bars containing higher-order motion cues, they become an attractive model system for investigating the neurophysiology underlying higher-order motion sensitivity. We here use intracellular electrophysiology of motion-vision-sensitive neurons in the hoverfly lobula plate to quantify responses to stimuli containing higher-order motion. We show that motion sensitivity can be broken down into two separate streams, directionally coding for elementary motion and figure motion, respectively, and that responses to Fourier and theta motion can be predicted from these. The sensitivity is affected both by the stimulus' time course and by the neuron's underlying receptive field. Responses to preferred-direction theta motion are sexually dimorphic and particularly robust along the visual midline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22586123      PMCID: PMC3365167          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1203081109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  Response latency of a motion-sensitive neuron in the fly visual system: dependence on stimulus parameters and physiological conditions.

Authors:  A Warzecha; M Egelhaaf
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visualizing retinotopic half-wave rectified input to the motion detection circuitry of Drosophila.

Authors:  Dierk F Reiff; Johannes Plett; Marco Mank; Oliver Griesbeck; Alexander Borst
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  No interaction of first- and second-order signals in the extraction of global-motion and optic-flow.

Authors:  Carlos R Cassanello; Mark Edwards; David R Badcock; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Fly motion vision.

Authors:  Alexander Borst; Juergen Haag; Dierk F Reiff
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception.

Authors:  C Chubb; G Sperling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Evidence for second-order motion detectors.

Authors:  G Mather; S West
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision.

Authors:  T Ledgeway; A T Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Defining the computational structure of the motion detector in Drosophila.

Authors:  Damon A Clark; Limor Bursztyn; Mark A Horowitz; Mark J Schnitzer; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Local and global motion preferences in descending neurons of the fly.

Authors:  Adrian Wertz; Juergen Haag; Alexander Borst
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Theta motion processing in fruit flies.

Authors:  Jamie C Theobald; Patrick A Shoemaker; Dario L Ringach; Mark A Frye
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  8 in total

1.  Neurons forming optic glomeruli compute figure-ground discriminations in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jacob W Aptekar; Mehmet F Keleş; Patrick M Lu; Nadezhda M Zolotova; Mark A Frye
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Second-order cues to figure motion enable object detection during prey capture by praying mantises.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; James O'Keeffe; Diana Umeton; Adam Simmons; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of impulse responses to figure motion in optic flow neurons.

Authors:  Yu-Jen Lee; H Olof Jönsson; Karin Nordström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Method and software for using m-sequences to characterize parallel components of higher-order visual tracking behavior in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jacob W Aptekar; Mehmet F Keles; Jean-Michel Mongeau; Patrick M Lu; Mark A Frye; Patrick A Shoemaker
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 5.  Themes of advanced information processing in the primate brain.

Authors:  Robert Friedman
Journal:  AIMS Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-15

6.  Facilitation of dragonfly target-detecting neurons by slow moving features on continuous paths.

Authors:  James R Dunbier; Steven D Wiederman; Patrick A Shoemaker; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  Figure-ground discrimination behavior in Drosophila. I. Spatial organization of wing-steering responses.

Authors:  Jessica L Fox; Jacob W Aptekar; Nadezhda M Zolotova; Patrick A Shoemaker; Mark A Frye
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Figure-ground discrimination behavior in Drosophila. II. Visual influences on head movement behavior.

Authors:  Jessica L Fox; Mark A Frye
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.312

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.