Literature DB >> 22586071

Ergonomics in thoracoscopic surgery: results of a survey among thoracic surgeons.

Katrin Welcker1, Emeka B Kesieme, Eveline Internullo, Laura J C Kranenburg van Koppen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The frequent and prolonged use of thoracoscopic equipment raises ergonomic risks which may cause physical distress. We aimed to determine the relationship between ergonomic problems encountered in thoracoscopic surgery and physical distress among thoracic surgeons.
METHODS: An online questionnaire which investigated personal factors, product factors, interaction factors and physical discomfort was sent to all members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS).
RESULTS: Of the respondents, 2.4% indicated that a one arm's length should be the optimal distance between the surgeon and the monitor. Only 2.4% indicated that the monitor should be positioned below the eye level of the surgeon. Most of the respondents agreed, partially to fully, that they experienced neck discomfort because of inappropriate monitor height, bad monitor position and bad table height. Most respondents experienced numb fingers and shoulder discomfort due to instrument manipulation. Most of the respondents (77.1%) experienced muscle fatigue to some extent due to a static posture during thoracoscopic surgery. The majority of respondents (81.9, 76.3 and 83.2% respectively) indicated that they had varying degrees of discomfort mainly in the neck, shoulder and back. Some 94.4% of respondents were unaware of any guidelines concerning table height, monitor and instrument placement for endoscopic surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Most thoracic surgeons in Europe are unaware of ergonomic guidelines and do not practise them, hence they suffer varying degrees of physical discomfort arising from ergonomic issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22586071      PMCID: PMC3397748          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  14 in total

1.  An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berquer; W D Smith; S Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Assessment of the ergonomically optimal operating surface height for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M A van Veelen; G Kazemier; J Koopman; R H M Goossens; D W Meijer
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 3.  Improvement of foot pedals used during surgery based on new ergonomic guidelines.

Authors:  M A van Veelen; C J Snijders; E van Leeuwen; R H M Goossens; G Kazemier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ergonomic problems encountered during video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.442

5.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J B Brodsky; E Cohen
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.706

6.  Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions.

Authors:  Liam A Haveran; Yuri W Novitsky; Donald R Czerniach; Gordie K Kaban; Melinda Taylor; Karen Gallagher-Dorval; Richard Schmidt; John J Kelly; Demetrius E M Litwin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The relationship between hand size and difficulty using surgical instruments: a survey of 726 laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  R Berguer; A Hreljac
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Ergonomic deficiencies in the operating room: examples from minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Ulrich Matern
Journal:  Work       Date:  2009

Review 9.  Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; E R Totté; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Ergonomics: requirements for adjusting the height of laparoscopic operating tables.

Authors:  U Matern; P Waller; C Giebmeyer; K D Rückauer; E H Farthmann
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of surgeon's muscle fatigue during thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy using interoperative surface electromyography.

Authors:  Seung-Hyun Yoon; Myung-Chul Jung; Seong Yong Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms amongst Otolaryngologists and Head and Neck surgeons in Canada.

Authors:  Josiane Bolduc-Bégin; François Prince; Apostolos Christopoulos; Tareck Ayad
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  A word of caution-when uniportal VATS should not be done.

Authors:  Florian Augustin; Thomas Schmid
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-02-07

4.  Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons and Interventionalists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sherise Epstein; Emily H Sparer; Bao N Tran; Qing Z Ruan; Jack T Dennerlein; Dhruv Singhal; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Ergon-trial: ergonomic evaluation of single-port access versus three-port access video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Luca Bertolaccini; Andrea Viti; Alberto Terzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Ergonomic thoracic port design for video-assisted thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy: a preliminary pilot study.

Authors:  Han-Yu Deng; Xi Zheng; Guha Alai; Ze-Guo Zhuo; Gang Li; Jun Luo; Yi-Dan Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

7.  Evaluation of 3D heads-up vitrectomy: outcomes of psychometric skills testing and surgeon satisfaction.

Authors:  Mario R Romano; Gilda Cennamo; Chiara Comune; Michela Cennamo; Mariantonia Ferrara; Luca Rombetto; Giovanni Cennamo
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Ergonomic status of laparoscopic urologic surgery: survey results from 241 urologic surgeons in china.

Authors:  Boluo Liang; Lin Qi; Jinrui Yang; Zhenzhen Cao; Xiongbing Zu; Longfei Liu; Long Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ergonomics in the operating room.

Authors:  Shiromani Janki; Evalyn E A P Mulder; Jan N M IJzermans; T C Khe Tran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Surgeon symptoms, strain, and selections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical ergonomics.

Authors:  Chee-Chee H Stucky; Kate D Cromwell; Rachel K Voss; Yi-Ju Chiang; Karin Woodman; Jeffrey E Lee; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.