PURPOSE: Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) represent a unique clinical syndrome occurring in patients treated with chemotherapy and/or external-beam radiation (XRT) and are characterized by poorer prognosis compared with de novo disease. XRT techniques have evolved in recent years and are associated with significantly reduced bone marrow exposure. The characteristics of post-XRT t-MN in the current era have not been studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed patients who developed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) after XRT alone (47 patients) or cytotoxic chemotherapy/combined-modality therapy (C/CMT, 181 patients) and compared them with patients with de novo MDS or AML (222 patients). We estimated bone marrow exposure to radiation and compared the clinical, pathologic, and cytogenetic features and outcome of the XRT patients with the C/CMT patients and with patients with de novo MDS and AML. RESULTS: Patients with t-MN after XRT alone had superior overall survival (P = .006) and lower incidence of high-risk karyotypes (P = .01 for AML and < .001 for MDS) compared with patients in the C/CMT group. In contrast, there were no significant differences in survival or frequency of high-risk karyotypes between the XRT and de novo groups. CONCLUSION: AML and MDS diagnosed in the past decade in patients after receiving XRT alone differ from t-MN occurring after C/CMT and share genetic features and clinical behavior with de novo AML/MDS. Our results suggest that post-XRT MDS/AML may not represent a direct consequence of radiation toxicity and warrant a therapeutic approach similar to de novo disease.
PURPOSE: Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) represent a unique clinical syndrome occurring in patients treated with chemotherapy and/or external-beam radiation (XRT) and are characterized by poorer prognosis compared with de novo disease. XRT techniques have evolved in recent years and are associated with significantly reduced bone marrow exposure. The characteristics of post-XRT t-MN in the current era have not been studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed patients who developed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) after XRT alone (47 patients) or cytotoxic chemotherapy/combined-modality therapy (C/CMT, 181 patients) and compared them with patients with de novo MDS or AML (222 patients). We estimated bone marrow exposure to radiation and compared the clinical, pathologic, and cytogenetic features and outcome of the XRT patients with the C/CMT patients and with patients with de novo MDS and AML. RESULTS:Patients with t-MN after XRT alone had superior overall survival (P = .006) and lower incidence of high-risk karyotypes (P = .01 for AML and < .001 for MDS) compared with patients in the C/CMT group. In contrast, there were no significant differences in survival or frequency of high-risk karyotypes between the XRT and de novo groups. CONCLUSION:AML and MDS diagnosed in the past decade in patients after receiving XRT alone differ from t-MN occurring after C/CMT and share genetic features and clinical behavior with de novo AML/MDS. Our results suggest that post-XRT MDS/AML may not represent a direct consequence of radiation toxicity and warrant a therapeutic approach similar to de novo disease.
Authors: Evert M Noordijk; Patrice Carde; Noëlle Dupouy; Anton Hagenbeek; Augustinus D G Krol; Johanna C Kluin-Nelemans; Umberto Tirelli; Mathieu Monconduit; José Thomas; Houchingue Eghbali; Berthe M P Aleman; Jacques Bosq; Marjeta Vovk; Tom A M Verschueren; Anne-Marie Pény; Théodore Girinsky; John M M Raemaekers; Michel Henry-Amar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mette K Andersen; Richard A Larson; Nils Mauritzson; Susanne Schnittger; Suresh C Jhanwar; Jens Pedersen-Bjergaard Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Arwa Abdelhameed; Gregory R Pond; Nicholas Mitsakakis; Joseph Brandwein; Kathy Chun; Vikas Gupta; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Jeffrey H Lipton; Mark D Minden; Aaron Schimmer; Andre Schuh; Karen Yee; Hans A Messner Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Andreas Engert; Petra Schiller; Andreas Josting; Richard Herrmann; Peter Koch; Markus Sieber; Friederike Boissevain; Maike De Wit; Jorg Mezger; Eckhart Duhmke; Normann Willich; Rolf-Peter Muller; Bernhard F Schmidt; Helmut Renner; Hans Konrad Muller-Hermelink; Beate Pfistner; Jurgen Wolf; Dirk Hasenclever; Markus Loffler; Volker Diehl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-08-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark R Litzow; Sergey Tarima; Waleska S Pérez; Brian J Bolwell; Mitchell S Cairo; Bruce M Camitta; Corey S Cutler; Marcos de Lima; John F Dipersio; Robert Peter Gale; Armand Keating; Hillard M Lazarus; Selina Luger; David I Marks; Richard T Maziarz; Philip L McCarthy; Marcelo C Pasquini; Gordon L Phillips; J Douglas Rizzo; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Daniel J Weisdorf Journal: Blood Date: 2009-12-23 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: C Y Ok; R P Hasserjian; P S Fox; F Stingo; Z Zuo; K H Young; K Patel; L J Medeiros; G Garcia-Manero; S A Wang Journal: Leukemia Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Guilin Tang; Zhuang Zuo; Deborah A Thomas; Pei Lin; Dingsheng Liu; Ying Hu; Hagop M Kantarjian; Carlos Bueso-Ramos; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Sa A Wang Journal: Haematologica Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 9.941