Literature DB >> 22585634

To transfer fresh or thawed embryos?

Anja Pinborg1.   

Abstract

Worldwide freezing and thawing of embryos has been increasingly used since the first infant was born as a result of this technique in 1984. The use of frozen embryo replacement (FER) currently even exceeds the number of fresh cycles performed in some countries. This article discusses the pros and cons of FER versus fresh-embryo transfer with regard to both single-cycle and cumulative pregnancy and delivery rates. The review discusses the obvious advantages of FER: minimizing the proportion of pharmacological and surgical treatments, and lowering the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancies, thereby increasing the safety for mother and child. Finally the article describes the accumulating literature on perinatal and long-term child outcome after transfer of frozen/thawed embryos, including a discussion on the concerns regarding cryo techniques and their possible roles in the subsequent development of fetus and child. Because larger and more detailed data sets are available for early cleavage-stage embryo freezing and slow freezing, they are the main focus of this review. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22585634     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Reprod Med        ISSN: 1526-4564            Impact factor:   1.303


  5 in total

1.  Agonist depot versus OCP programming of frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of freeze-all cycles.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Increased risk of large-for-gestational age birthweight in singleton siblings conceived with in vitro fertilization in frozen versus fresh cycles.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; James P Toner; Charles C Coddington
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Which one has a better obstetric and perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancy, IVF/ICSI or FET?: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Zhao; B Xu; Q Zhang; Y P Li
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Comparison of a 'freeze-all' strategy including GnRH agonist trigger versus a 'fresh transfer' strategy including hCG trigger in assisted reproductive technology (ART): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sacha Stormlund; Kristine Løssl; Anne Zedeler; Jeanette Bogstad; Lisbeth Prætorius; Henriette Svarre Nielsen; Mona Bungum; Sven O Skouby; Anne Lis Mikkelsen; Anders Nyboe Andersen; Christina Bergh; Peter Humaidan; Anja Pinborg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Cohort profile: a national, population-based cohort of children born after assisted conception in the UK (1992-2009): methodology and birthweight analysis.

Authors:  Mitana Purkayastha; Stephen A Roberts; Julian Gardiner; Daniel R Brison; Scott M Nelson; Deborah Lawlor; Barbara Luke; Alastair Sutcliffe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.