PURPOSE: During neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), it is difficult to quantify the relative contribution of the patient versus the ventilator to the inspiratory tidal volume (Vt(insp)). To solve this problem, we developed an index, the "patient-ventilator breath contribution" (PVBC), using the inspiratory deflection of the diaphragmatic electrical activity (∆EAdi) and Vt(insp) during assisted and non-assisted breaths. This study evaluated the PVBC index in an experimental setup. METHOD: Nine intubated and sedated rabbits were studied during repeated ramp increases of the NAVA level. One breath was non-assisted at each NAVA level. The PVBC index was evaluated during resistive loading and after acute lung injury. PVBC was calculated by relating Vt(insp)/∆EAdi of a non-assisted breath to that of the preceding assisted breath. The PVBC was compared to the relative contribution of esophageal pressure (∆Pes) to transpulmonary pressure deflections (∆P (L,dyn)). RESULTS: The relationship between PVBC and ∆Pes/∆P (L,dyn) was slightly curvilinear with an intercept different from zero (y = -1x (2 )+ 1.64x + 0.21) and a determination coefficient (R (2)) of 0.95. Squaring the PVBC values resulted in a near perfect linear relationship (y = 1.02x + 0.05) between PVBC(2) and ∆Pes/∆P (L,dyn) with an R (2) of 0.97. CONCLUSION: This study shows that Vt(insp) and EAdi can be used to predict the contribution of the inspiratory muscles versus that of the ventilator during NAVA. If clinically applicable, this could serve to quantify and standardize the adjustment of the level of assist, and hence reduce the risks of excessive ventilatory assist. Further studies are required to evaluate if this method is clinically applicable.
PURPOSE: During neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), it is difficult to quantify the relative contribution of the patient versus the ventilator to the inspiratory tidal volume (Vt(insp)). To solve this problem, we developed an index, the "patient-ventilator breath contribution" (PVBC), using the inspiratory deflection of the diaphragmatic electrical activity (∆EAdi) and Vt(insp) during assisted and non-assisted breaths. This study evaluated the PVBC index in an experimental setup. METHOD: Nine intubated and sedated rabbits were studied during repeated ramp increases of the NAVA level. One breath was non-assisted at each NAVA level. The PVBC index was evaluated during resistive loading and after acute lung injury. PVBC was calculated by relating Vt(insp)/∆EAdi of a non-assisted breath to that of the preceding assisted breath. The PVBC was compared to the relative contribution of esophageal pressure (∆Pes) to transpulmonary pressure deflections (∆P (L,dyn)). RESULTS: The relationship between PVBC and ∆Pes/∆P (L,dyn) was slightly curvilinear with an intercept different from zero (y = -1x (2 )+ 1.64x + 0.21) and a determination coefficient (R (2)) of 0.95. Squaring the PVBC values resulted in a near perfect linear relationship (y = 1.02x + 0.05) between PVBC(2) and ∆Pes/∆P (L,dyn) with an R (2) of 0.97. CONCLUSION: This study shows that Vt(insp) and EAdi can be used to predict the contribution of the inspiratory muscles versus that of the ventilator during NAVA. If clinically applicable, this could serve to quantify and standardize the adjustment of the level of assist, and hence reduce the risks of excessive ventilatory assist. Further studies are required to evaluate if this method is clinically applicable.
Authors: S G Zakynthinos; T Vassilakopoulos; E Zakynthinos; C Roussos; G E Tzelepis Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Christer Sinderby; Jennifer Beck; Jadranka Spahija; Michel de Marchie; Jacques Lacroix; Paolo Navalesi; Arthur S Slutsky Journal: Chest Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: A Aliverti; S J Cala; R Duranti; G Ferrigno; C M Kenyon; A Pedotti; G Scano; P Sliwinski; P T Macklem; S Yan Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 1997-10
Authors: Lukas Brander; Howard Leong-Poi; Jennifer Beck; Fabrice Brunet; Stuart J Hutchison; Arthur S Slutsky; Christer Sinderby Journal: Chest Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: C J Jolley; Y-M Luo; J Steier; C Reilly; J Seymour; A Lunt; K Ward; G F Rafferty; M I Polkey; J Moxham Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Lucia Mirabella; Giacomo Grasselli; Jack J Haitsma; Haibo Zhang; Arthur S Slutsky; Christer Sinderby; Jennifer Beck Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Diana Jansen; Annemijn H Jonkman; Lisanne Roesthuis; Suvarna Gadgil; Johannes G van der Hoeven; Gert-Jan J Scheffer; Armand Girbes; Jonne Doorduin; Christer S Sinderby; Leo M A Heunks Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Annemijn H Jonkman; Michela Rauseo; Guillaume Carteaux; Irene Telias; Michael C Sklar; Leo Heunks; Laurent J Brochard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 17.440