Literature DB >> 22584281

Spasticity changes in SCI following a dynamic standing program using the Segway.

G Boutilier1, B J Sawatzky, C Grant, S Wiefelspuett, H Finlayson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A pilot prospective pre- and post-intervention study.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a dynamic standing program using the Segway Personal Transporter results in any measurable physiological effects in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) using both qualitative and quantitative measures of spasticity, pain and fatigue.
SETTING: International Collaboration of Repair Discoveries (ICORD) Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
METHODS: Eight individuals with SCI ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) A-D, who could stand with or without the assistance of bracing or supports, participated in a 4-week dynamic standing program using a Segway (3 per week, 30-min sessions). The main outcome was spasticity as measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Secondary measures included the SCI-Spasticity Evaluation Tool, Pain Outcomes Questionnaire, and Fatigue Severity Scale.
RESULTS: The dynamic standing sessions were associated with immediate improvements in spasticity (MAS) (P<0.001) and self-reported pain (P<0.05). Fatigue levels decreased, however this was not significant. There is little evidence to suggest that these beneficial outcomes may have lasting effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic standing on the Segway may be effective for short-term spasticity reduction and decreased pain and fatigue. Future work should examine a larger sample size and help to propose mechanisms for potential reductions in spasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22584281     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2012.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  7 in total

1.  Does regular standing improve bowel function in people with spinal cord injury? A randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  S Kwok; L Harvey; J Glinsky; J L Bowden; M Coggrave; D Tussler
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Static standing, dynamic standing and spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M Sadeghi; J Mclvor; H Finlayson; B Sawatzky
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Segway® related injuries in Vienna: report from the Lorenz Böhler Trauma Centre.

Authors:  D Roider; C Busch; R Spitaler; H Hertz
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  The Spinal Cord Injury Spasticity Evaluation Tool: A Persian adaptation and validation study.

Authors:  Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari; Mina Kashi; Soofia Naghdi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Identifying and classifying quality of life tools for assessing spasticity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Christina Balioussis; Sander L Hitzig; Heather Flett; Luc Noreau; B Catharine Craven
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2014

Review 6.  A review and evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures for spasticity in persons with spinal cord damage: Recommendations from the Ability Network - an international initiative.

Authors:  Per Ertzgaard; Anand Nene; Carlotte Kiekens; Anthony S Burns
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Weakened rate-dependent depression of Hoffmann's reflex and increased motoneuron hyperactivity after motor cortical infarction in mice.

Authors:  S Lee; T Toda; H Kiyama; T Yamashita
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 8.469

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.