Literature DB >> 2258425

Separation procedures used to reveal and follow drug-protein binding.

B Sebille1, R Zini, C V Madjar, N Thuaud, J P Tillement.   

Abstract

The review gives a critical evaluation of the different separation procedures used to study drug-protein interactions and describes their various fields of application. For pharmacological studies, the most widely used methods are dialysis and ultrafiltration, because they allow measurements with solutions of high protein concentrations, such as those found in therapeutic conditions. Both techniques use membrane devices, which may induce additional binding effects. Another drawback of these techniques is the need for radiolabelled compounds. Chromatographic methods, which now take advantage of the technology of high-performance liquid chromatography, are generally faster and do not use drug labelling because of the higher sensitivities of the detectors. Two different approaches are possible: either all the interacting species (protein and drug) are dissolved in the mobile phase, or one of them (protein or drug) is immobilized on the support. Several chromatographic methods are available for studies in solution that differ according to the sample injection mode (frontal or zonal elution) and the nature of the mobile phase used. They include quantitation of the drug-protein complex by zonal elution, the Hummel and Dreyer method, frontal elution, the vacancy peak method, and retention analysis by zonal elution. Frontal elution is the most rigorous method since all the species at equilibrium are present in the mobile phase with known and constant concentrations. The most promising one is the Hummel and Dreyer method, because of the very small amount of protein injected in the mobile phase containing the drug. Drug-protein interactions may be studied by affinity chromatography by immobilizing one of the interacting species on the support. Comparison of the constants obtained with methods when both the drug and the protein are in solution is questionable, since the immobilized species in affinity separations differ in their physical properties from those in solution. The main advantage with studies on immobilized proteins is the easy comparison of the binding properties of various drugs, especially when they are enantiomeric. The results of the binding constants measured by different separation methods are given for the albumin-phenylbutazone and albumin-warfarin systems. Good agreement is generally obtained, which proves the validity of using chromatography as a tool to study drug-protein interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2258425     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)82280-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr


  8 in total

1.  The male genital tract is not a pharmacological sanctuary from efavirenz.

Authors:  L B Avery; R P Bakshi; Y J Cao; C W Hendrix
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Frontal analysis in microchip CE: a simple and accurate method for determination of protein-DNA dissociation constant.

Authors:  Maojun Gong; Kenneth R Wehmeyer; Patrick A Limbach; William R Heineman
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Impact of hypoalbuminemia on voriconazole pharmacokinetics in critically ill adult patients.

Authors:  Kim Vanstraelen; Joost Wauters; Ine Vercammen; Henriette de Loor; Johan Maertens; Katrien Lagrou; Pieter Annaert; Isabel Spriet
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Methods for measuring aptamer-protein equilibria: a review.

Authors:  Meng Jing; Michael T Bowser
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.558

5.  Characterization of solute binding at human serum albumin site II and its geometry using a biochromatographic approach.

Authors:  E Peyrin; Y C Guillaume; C Guinchard
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Disposition, bioavailability, and serum protein binding of pentachlorophenol in the B6C3F1 mouse.

Authors:  B G Reigner; J F Rigod; T N Tozer
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  A study of the interaction between ropranolol and NSAIDs in protein binding by gel filtration method.

Authors:  Rezaei Zahra; Raissi Ahmad; Moshtaghi S Ali Asghar; Asadipour Ali; Khabnadideh Soghra
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2006-03

8.  CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF DRUG INTERACTIONS IN THE SERUM PROTEOME.

Authors:  David S Hage; Jeanethe A Anguizola; Abby J Jackson; Ryan Matsuda; Efthimia Papastavros; Erika Pfaunmiller; Zenghan Tong; John Vargas-Badilla; Michelle J Yoo; Xiwei Zheng
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.896

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.