Literature DB >> 22584226

Age related differences in the neural substrates of motor sequence learning after interleaved and repetitive practice.

Chien-Ho Lin1, Ming-Chang Chiang, Allan D Wu, Marco Iacoboni, Parima Udompholkul, Omid Yazdanshenas, Barbara J Knowlton.   

Abstract

Practice of tasks in an interleaved order generally induces superior retention compared to practicing in a repetitive order. Younger and older adults practiced serial reaction time tasks that were arranged in a repeated or an interleaved order on 2 successive days. Retention was tested on Day 5. For both groups, reaction times in the interleaved condition were slower than the repetitive condition during practice, but the reverse was true during retention on Day 5. After interleaved practice, changes in M1 excitability measured by paired-pulse TMS were greater than after repetitive practice, and this effect was more pronounced in older adults. Moreover, the increased M1 excitability correlated with the benefit of interleaved practice. BOLD signal was also increased for interleaved compared to repetitive practice in both groups. However, the pattern of correlations between increased BOLD during practice and subsequent benefit of the interleaved condition differed by group. In younger adults, dorsolateral-prefrontal activity during practice was related to this benefit, while in older adults, activation in sensorimotor regions and rostral prefrontal cortex during practice correlated with the benefit of interleaving on retention. Older adults may engage compensatory mechanisms during interleaved practice such as increasing sensorimotor recruitment which in turn benefits learning.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22584226     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

Review 1.  Consolidating behavioral and neurophysiologic findings to explain the influence of contextual interference during motor sequence learning.

Authors:  David Wright; Willem Verwey; John Buchanen; Jing Chen; Joohyun Rhee; Maarten Immink
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

2.  Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dorsal premotor activity and connectivity relate to action selection performance after stroke.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; Pritha Dewanjee; Umar Shariff; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Challenge to Promote Change: The Neural Basis of the Contextual Interference Effect in Young and Older Adults.

Authors:  Lisa Pauwels; Sima Chalavi; Jolien Gooijers; Celine Maes; Geneviève Albouy; Stefan Sunaert; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Prefrontal Cortex Activation During Motor Sequence Learning Under Interleaved and Repetitive Practice: A Two-Channel Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.

Authors:  Maarten A Immink; Monique Pointon; David L Wright; Frank E Marino
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Differential Training Facilitates Early Consolidation in Motor Learning.

Authors:  Diana Henz; Wolfgang I Schöllhorn
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Post-task Effects on EEG Brain Activity Differ for Various Differential Learning and Contextual Interference Protocols.

Authors:  Diana Henz; Alexander John; Christian Merz; Wolfgang I Schöllhorn
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Neural Mechanisms of the Contextual Interference Effect and Parameter Similarity on Motor Learning in Older Adults: An EEG Study.

Authors:  Meysam Beik; Hamidreza Taheri; Alireza Saberi Kakhki; Majid Ghoshuni
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Aging and brain plasticity.

Authors:  Lisa Pauwels; Sima Chalavi; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  Challenge to promote change: both young and older adults benefit from contextual interference.

Authors:  Lisa Pauwels; Kathleen Vancleef; Stephan P Swinnen; Iseult A M Beets
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.