| Literature DB >> 22583819 |
Nikolaus Sonnenschein1, José Felipe Golib Dzib, Annick Lesne, Sebastian Eilebrecht, Sheerazed Boulkroun, Maria-Christina Zennaro, Arndt Benecke, Marc-Thorsten Hütt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Integrating gene expression profiles and metabolic pathways under different experimental conditions is essential for understanding the coherence of these two layers of cellular organization. The network character of metabolic systems can be instrumental in developing concepts of agreement between expression data and pathways. A network-driven interpretation of gene expression data has the potential of suggesting novel classifiers for pathological cellular states and of contributing to a general theoretical understanding of gene regulation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22583819 PMCID: PMC3579709 DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-41
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Syst Biol ISSN: 1752-0509
Figure 1A schematic figure explaining the metabolic coherence (), inconsistency and methodological approach behind the comparison of and (a) A threshold t is applied onto the data x, depicted here as an overlay histogram of the raw log-signal intensities of the adenoma data, in order to obtain a binary gene/reaction (nodes) presence (green) and absence (red) pattern p. (b) Effective gene subnetworks are constructed from the present genes in p and the overall static gene-network representation of human metabolism (step 1). The ratio (coherence C) of connected genes (gray nodes) to isolated genes (light gray nodes) is determined (step 2). Sampling the overall static network with randomly generated presence patterns provides a distribution of null hypothesis coherence values C’ (step 3). The coherence C is transformed into the z-score MC (metabolic coherence) using C’ (step 4). (c) GIMME (Gene Inactivity Moderated by Metabolism and Expression) computes suitable flux distributions by simultaneously asserting flux through a specified objective (v; in fact a certain level l of the theoretically achievable maximum determined by FBA) and minimizing flux through absent reactions. (d) The flow chart depicts the necessary steps in setting up a comparative analysis of MC and I.
Figure 2Two types of metabolic behaviors in adenoma tumors. Distributions of (a) inconsistency (I) and (c) metabolic coherence (MC) scores for the adenoma and control samples. (b) A hierarchical cluster-analysis of the data does not reveal a clear separation of the low (LIG) and high (HIG) inconsistency groups.
Figure 3Comparison of metabolic coherence and inconsistency measures for the adenoma data set. (a) The aldosterone-production inconsistency values are plotted against the MC of 69 tumor and control data sets. A clear negative correlation is visible (Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient r=−0.65, with p≤7×10−10determined by one-tailed t statistic, and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient ρ=−0.72; t=1.9; l=0.95). (b) Dependency of the correlation on the threshold parameter (l=0.95). (c) Medium dependency of the negative correlation strength. Both Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient as well as Pearson’s correlation where computed for the MC and the inconsistency for 100 random growth media (t=1.9; l=0.95). The dashed line in (b) indicates the threshold parameter used in (a). Arrows in (c) indicate the correlation values found in (a).
Figure 4Inconsistency contributions to carbohydrate metabolism. The maps depict the usage patterns and inconsistency contributions for (a) the control and (b) the high and (c) low inconsistency groups (HIG and LIG). The thickness and color of a reaction edge correspond to the usage frequency and the contribution strength, respectively. The pathway maps have been obtained from the BIGG database [17].
Figure 5Inconsistency contributions from adenoma tumor samples showing lower (LIG) and higher (HIG) inconsistencies (top and middle panel) in comparison to the control group (bottom panel). The gray box highlights the group of unspecific reaction contributions. These contributions are covered together with a selection differentially contributing (bold reaction labels) in Table 1 and Supporting Additional file 1: Text S1 Table S2. Only a subset of all contributing reactions is shown due to space limitations (the complete diagram is available in Additional file 1: Text S1 Figure S3).
Classification of contributions to the inconsistency vector (BN, IP, COL, SIaa; Additional file2, SIcarb; Additional file3, SIlip; Additional file4, SIvit; Additional file5)
| AATAi** | unspecific | BN; IP | ||
| | | | in all precursors. | SIaa, B1 |
| PROD2* | unspecific | CD; CIL | SIaa, D3 | |
| DPMVDx | unspecific | CD | ||
| | | | not expressed; wrong or missing GPR assoc. (Figure S5c). | SIlip, B5 |
| GLYK | unspecific | CIL | ||
| | | | might not be available as a | SIlip, E5 |
| PHETHPTOX2 | unspecific | CIL | ||
| | | | (not provided in the | |
| | | | available as an | SIaa, A5 |
| 34HPPOR*** | unspecific | CD; CIL | ||
| | | | not expressed (see Figure S5m). | SIaa, B5 |
| FUMtm | unspecific | — | no map | |
| GLUTCOADHm** | specific | CD | SIaa, A2 | |
| PDHm | specific | BN | SIcarb, C3 | |
| MMEm | specific | CD | SIaa, D1–E1 | |
| MEVK1x | specific | CD | SIlip, B5 | |
| G6PDH(1,2)rer | specific | – | SIcarb, C4–D4 | |
| DHCR71r | specific | CD; COL | SIlip, A4 | |
| HEX1 | specific | CD; CIL | SIcarb, C4–C5 | |
| SQLEr | specific | CD | SIlip, A5 |
*Proline cycle issue; see Figure 6.
**2-Oxoadipate issue; see Figure 7.
***Tyrosine path to fumarate and acetoacetate issue; see Figure S4 and Text S1.
Figure 6-pyrroline-5-carboxylate-proline cycle. The NADH to FADH2 interconverting cycle composed of pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase and pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase is depicted together with the distributions of expression values for the cytosolic (PROD2 and P5CRx) and mitochondrial (PROD2m and P5CRxm) versions of pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase and proline dehydrogenase. The control is depicted in purple, the LIG and HIG in green and red, respectively, and the dashed lines indicate the threshold used for the GIMME computations (see Figure 7 for a detailed legend).
Figure 7(a) 2-Oxoadipate production pathway starting from lysine and involving the unspecific contributor AATAi (see Table1and Supporting Additional file1: Text S1 Table S2). Dashed lines indicate the threshold used for the GIMME computations. (b) 2-Oxoadipate production pathway starting from tryptophan and involving the unspecific contributor 2OXOADPTm (see Table 1 and Supporting Additional file 1: Text S1 Table S2) among other more specific contributions. Dashed lines indicate the threshold used for the GIMME computations.