Literature DB >> 2258379

Double-blind, multicenter comparison of sertraline and amitriptyline in elderly depressed patients.

C K Cohn1, R Shrivastava, J Mendels, J B Cohn, L F Fabre, J L Claghorn, E C Dessain, T M Itil, A Lautin.   

Abstract

Two hundred forty-one elderly depressed patients entered the 8-week, double-blind phase of this parallel-group, multicenter study; 161 patients were randomized to receive sertraline (50-200 mg/day) and 80 were randomized to receive amitriptyline (50-150 mg/day). Among evaluable patients, there were no statistically significant differences between treatments in any of the primary efficacy variables: change in total Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score (17 items), percentage change in HAM-D score, change in HAM-D Item 1, change in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Severity score, change in the Depression Factor of the 56-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist, and the CGI Improvement score at the last visit. Similar results were obtained using data from all patients (intention-to-treat analysis), except that amitriptyline was superior in HAM-D Total score (p = .044). The two drugs produced a similar degree of response: on the basis of the HAM-D criterion, 69.4% of sertraline patients and 62.5% of amitriptyline patients responded, and, on the basis of CGI criterion, 79.5% of sertraline and 73.4% of amitriptyline patients responded. Twenty-eight percent of the sertraline patients withdrew from the study because of a treatment-related side effect and 2.5% (4) because of a laboratory abnormality. In comparison, 35% of the amitriptyline patients withdrew because of treatment-related side effects. Sertraline was associated with a statistically lower frequency of somnolence, dry mouth, constipation, ataxia, and pain and a higher frequency of nausea, anorexia, diarrhea/loose stools, and insomnia; thus, anticholinergic effects were less common and gastrointestinal effects were more common with sertraline than with amitriptyline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2258379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  33 in total

1.  New antidepressants for old people?

Authors:  M G Livingston; H M Livingston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-19

2.  Dr. Marken Replies.

Authors:  Patricia A. Marken
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2001-10

3.  The added costs of depression to medical care.

Authors:  K Franco; M Tamburino; N Campbell; J Zrull; C Evans; D Bronson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Use of antidepressants in late-life depression.

Authors:  Tarek K Rajji; Benoit H Mulsant; Francis E Lotrich; Cynthia Lokker; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Adverse effects associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Trindade; D Menon; L A Topfer; C Coloma
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Risks and benefits of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  P Mourilhe; P E Stokes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Constraints on antidepressant prescribing and principles of cost-effective antidepressant use. Part 2: Cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  J A Henry; C A Rivas
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in older patients. A tolerability perspective.

Authors:  U Skerritt; R Evans; S A Montgomery
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Drug therapy for geriatric depression.

Authors:  R Bressler; M D Katz
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Management of agitation in nursing home patients.

Authors:  N Billig
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.