PURPOSE: To investigate pelvic insufficiency fractures (IF) after definitive pelvic radiation therapy for early-stage uterine cervical cancer, by analyzing subjects of a prospective, multi-institutional study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2004 and July 2007, 59 eligible patients were analyzed. The median age was 73 years (range, 37-84 years). The International Federation of Gynecologic Oncology and Obstetrics stages were Ib1 in 35, IIa in 12, and IIb in 12 patients. Patients were treated with the constant method, which consisted of whole-pelvic external-beam radiation therapy of 50 Gy/25 fractions and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy of 24 Gy/4 fractions without chemotherapy. After radiation therapy the patients were evaluated by both pelvic CT and pelvic MRI at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Diagnosis of IF was made when the patients had both CT and MRI findings, neither recurrent tumor lesions nor traumatic histories. The CT findings of IF were defined as fracture lines or sclerotic linear changes in the bones, and MRI findings of IF were defined as signal intensity changes in the bones, both on T1- and T2-weighted images. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24 months. The 2-year pelvic IF cumulative occurrence rate was 36.9% (21 patients). Using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0, grade 1, 2, and 3 IF were seen in 12 (21%), 6 (10%), and 3 patients (5%), respectively. Sixteen patients had multiple fractures, so IF were identified at 44 sites. The pelvic IF were frequently seen at the sacroileal joints (32 sites, 72%). Nine patients complained of pain. All patients' pains were palliated by rest or non-narcotic analgesic drugs. Higher age (>70 years) and low body weight (<50 kg) were thought to be risk factors for pelvic IF (P=.007 and P=.013, Cox hazard test). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cancer patients with higher age and low body weight may be at some risk for the development of pelvic IF after pelvic radiation therapy.
PURPOSE: To investigate pelvic insufficiency fractures (IF) after definitive pelvic radiation therapy for early-stage uterine cervical cancer, by analyzing subjects of a prospective, multi-institutional study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2004 and July 2007, 59 eligible patients were analyzed. The median age was 73 years (range, 37-84 years). The International Federation of Gynecologic Oncology and Obstetrics stages were Ib1 in 35, IIa in 12, and IIb in 12 patients. Patients were treated with the constant method, which consisted of whole-pelvic external-beam radiation therapy of 50 Gy/25 fractions and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy of 24 Gy/4 fractions without chemotherapy. After radiation therapy the patients were evaluated by both pelvic CT and pelvic MRI at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Diagnosis of IF was made when the patients had both CT and MRI findings, neither recurrent tumor lesions nor traumatic histories. The CT findings of IF were defined as fracture lines or sclerotic linear changes in the bones, and MRI findings of IF were defined as signal intensity changes in the bones, both on T1- and T2-weighted images. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24 months. The 2-year pelvic IF cumulative occurrence rate was 36.9% (21 patients). Using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0, grade 1, 2, and 3 IF were seen in 12 (21%), 6 (10%), and 3 patients (5%), respectively. Sixteen patients had multiple fractures, so IF were identified at 44 sites. The pelvic IF were frequently seen at the sacroileal joints (32 sites, 72%). Nine patients complained of pain. All patients' pains were palliated by rest or non-narcotic analgesic drugs. Higher age (>70 years) and low body weight (<50 kg) were thought to be risk factors for pelvic IF (P=.007 and P=.013, Cox hazard test). CONCLUSIONS:Cervical cancerpatients with higher age and low body weight may be at some risk for the development of pelvic IF after pelvic radiation therapy.
Authors: V Nardone; P Tini; S F Carbone; A Grassi; M Biondi; L Sebaste; T Carfagno; E Vanzi; G De Otto; G Battaglia; G Rubino; P Pastina; G Belmonte; L N Mazzoni; F Banci Buonamici; M A Mazzei; L Pirtoli Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Susanta K Hui; Luke Arentsen; Thanasak Sueblinvong; Keenan Brown; Pat Bolan; Rahel G Ghebre; Levi Downs; Ryan Shanley; Karen E Hansen; Anne G Minenko; Yutaka Takhashi; Masashi Yagi; Yan Zhang; Melissa Geller; Margaret Reynolds; Chung K Lee; Anne H Blaes; Sharon Allen; Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Chap Le; Jerry Froelich; Clifford Rosen; Douglas Yee Journal: Bone Date: 2014-12-20 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Mila P Salcedo; Anil K Sood; Anuja Jhingran; Patricia J Eifel; Ann H Klopp; Revathy B Iyer; Bryan M Fellman; Camilo Jimenez; Kathleen M Schmeler Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Åsa H Everhov; Sara Ekberg; Angelica Lindén Hirschberg; Karin Bergmark; Angelique Flöter Rådestad; Ingrid Glimelius; Karin E Smedby Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 4.442