Literature DB >> 22583518

Characteristics of a sharp decrease in Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections and seafood contamination in Japan.

Yukiko Hara-Kudo1, Shihoko Saito, Kayoko Ohtsuka, Shogo Yamasaki, Shunsuke Yahiro, Tomohiro Nishio, Yoshito Iwade, Yoshimitsu Otomo, Hirotaka Konuma, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Kanji Sugiyama, Yoshiko Sugita-Konishi, Susumu Kumagai.   

Abstract

Vibrio parahaemolyticus has been one of the most important foodborne pathogens in Japan since the 1960s, and a large epidemic was caused by the pandemic serotype O3:K6 from 1997 to 2001. V. parahaemolyticus infections, however, have sharply declined since that time. Data on serotypes isolated from 977 outbreaks were collected and analysed. Total and pathogenic, thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) gene-positive V. parahaemolyticus were qualitatively and quantitatively detected in 842 seafood samples from wholesale markets in 2007-2009. Strains isolated from patients and seafood were analysed by serotyping, tdh-PCR, group-specific PCR for pandemic strains, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The sharp decrease in the infections from 1999 onwards was noted not only for O3:K6 infections but also for other serotypes. The change in the seafood contamination situation from 2001 to 2007-2009 was characterised by a decrease to three-fourths in the frequency of tdh-positive samples, although that decrease was small compared to the 18-fold decrease in the cases of V. parahaemolyticus outbreaks. PFGE detected the pandemic O3:K6 serotype in the same profile in seafood and patients from 1998 to the present. Because of no large decrease in seafood contamination by V. parahaemolyticus from the production to distribution stages and the presence of pandemic O3:K6 serotype in seafood to the present, it was suggested that the change of seafood contamination was unrelated to the sharp decrease in V. parahaemolyticus infections. V. parahaemolyticus infections might be prevented at the stages after the distribution stage.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22583518     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  6 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Andrea J Linscott
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Roles of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) and TDH-related hemolysin (TRH) in Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Authors:  Pendru Raghunath
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Southern Coastal Region of China, 2007-2012.

Authors:  Yinghui Li; Xu Xie; Xiaolu Shi; Yiman Lin; Yaqun Qiu; Jin Mou; Qiongcheng Chen; Yan Lu; Li Zhou; Min Jiang; Honghu Sun; Hanwu Ma; Jinquan Cheng; Qinghua Hu
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Trends in the epidemiology of pandemic and non-pandemic strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from diarrheal patients in Kolkata, India.

Authors:  Gururaja P Pazhani; Sushanta K Bhowmik; Santanu Ghosh; Sucharita Guin; Sanjucta Dutta; Krishnan Rajendran; Dhira Rani Saha; Ranjan K Nandy; Mihir K Bhattacharya; Asish K Mukhopadhyay; Thandavarayan Ramamurthy
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-05-01

Review 5.  Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a review on the pathogenesis, prevalence, and advance molecular identification techniques.

Authors:  Vengadesh Letchumanan; Kok-Gan Chan; Learn-Han Lee
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Isolation and Characterization of a Lytic Vibrio parahaemolyticus Phage vB_VpaP_GHSM17 from Sewage Samples.

Authors:  Xunru Liang; Yuhang Wang; Bin Hong; Yanmei Li; Yi Ma; Jufang Wang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.818

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.