| Literature DB >> 22583332 |
Michael L Mohler1, Christopher C Coss, Charles B Duke, Shivaputra A Patil, Duane D Miller, James T Dalton.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Androgen receptor (AR) antagonists are predominantly used as chemical castration to treat prostate cancer (i.e., in conjunction with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)). Unfortunately, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) typically develops that is refractory to targeted therapy. Insights into CRPC biology have led to the emergence of a promising clinical candidate MDV3100 (1) and a resurgence in this field. A pipeline of preclinical competitive (C-terminally directed) antagonists was discovered using a variety of innovative screening paradigms. Some inhibit nuclear translocation, selectively downregulate or degrade AR (SARD), antagonize wild-type and escape mutant AR (pan-antagonists) and/or antagonize AR target organs in vivo. Separately, the N-terminal domain has emerged as a promising novel target for noncompetitive antagonists. AREAS COVERED: AR antagonists whose patents published between 2008 and 2011 are reviewed. Antagonists are organized based on the screening paradigm reported as discussed above. EXPERT OPINION: Novel mechanisms provide a more informed basis for selecting a competitive antagonist; however, high potency and favorable in vivo properties remain paramount. Noncompetitive antagonists have theoretical advantages suggestive of improved clinical efficacy, but no clinical proof of concept as of yet.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22583332 DOI: 10.1517/13543776.2012.682571
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Opin Ther Pat ISSN: 1354-3776 Impact factor: 6.674