Literature DB >> 22581470

The transradial versus the transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jae-Sik Jang1, Han-Young Jin, Jeong-Sook Seo, Tae-Hyun Yang, Dae-Kyeong Kim, Dong-Kie Kim, Doo-Il Kim, Kyoung-Im Cho, Bo-Hyun Kim, Yong Hyun Park, Hyung-Gon Je, Dong-Soo Kim.   

Abstract

AIMS: There is an increasing amount of data suggesting that transradial approach is associated with lower incidence of complications in vascular access site and improved clinical outcomes compared with transfemoral approach in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of radial versus femoral percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with STEMI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for randomised, case-control, and cohort studies comparing access-related complications and clinical outcomes from January 2001 to October 2011. Twenty-one studies involving 8,534 patients were identified. Transradial approach was associated with a significant reductions in major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.72, p<0.001), mortality (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42-0.72, p<0.001), and major bleeding (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22-0.48, p<0.001) compared to transfemoral approach. There was a shorter hospital length of stay with transradial access with a weighted mean difference of 2.23 days (95% CI -3.32--1.14, p<0.001) compared to transfemoral access. There were no differences in fluoroscopic time, door-to-balloon time, and procedure time between the two access routes (p=0.09, p=0.38, p=0.82, respectively). The rate of access site crossover tended to be higher with transradial access (p=0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: This updated meta-analysis demonstrates that transradial PCI reduces the risk of significant periprocedural bleeding and improve clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22581470     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV8I4A78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  12 in total

1.  Delay in reperfusion with transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Might some delays be acceptable?

Authors:  Neil J Wimmer; David J Cohen; Jason H Wasfy; Saif S Rathore; Laura Mauri; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Vascular access and closure in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention.

Authors:  Robert A Byrne; Salvatore Cassese; Maryam Linhardt; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: reperfusion strategies, pharmacology and stent selection.

Authors:  Vikas Singh; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-05

4.  Association of Physician Certification in Interventional Cardiology With In-Hospital Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Paul N Fiorilli; Karl E Minges; Jeph Herrin; John C Messenger; Henry H Ting; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Rebecca S Lipner; Brian J Hess; Eric S Holmboe; Joseph J Brennan; Jeptha P Curtis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011).

Authors:  Dmitri V Baklanov; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Steven P Marso; Sumeet S Subherwal; Dmitriy N Feldman; Kirk N Garratt; Jeptha P Curtis; John C Messenger; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ahmed A Kolkailah; Rabah S Alreshq; Ahmed M Muhammed; Mohamed E Zahran; Marwah Anas El-Wegoud; Ashraf F Nabhan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-18

Review 7.  Meta-analysis of randomized trials on access site selection for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  András Komócsi; Dániel Aradi; Dániel Kehl; Imre Ungi; Attila Thury; Tünde Pintér; James J Di Nicolantonio; Adrienn Tornyos; András Vorobcsuk
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 8.  Forearm approach for percutaneous coronary procedures.

Authors:  Zoran Stajic; Radoslav Romanovic; Dragan Tavciovski
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2013-12-04

9.  Evaluation of the usefulness of coronary catheters and 4 Fr insertion sets for transradial access coronarography in comparison with catheters and 5 Fr sets.

Authors:  Piotr Chodór; Stanisław Morawski; Sylwia Sulik-Gajda; Nela Ramus; Jacek Kowalczyk; Grzegorz Honisz; Krzysztof Wilczek; Beata Sredniawa; Zbigniew Kalarus
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 1.426

10.  Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Raffaele Piccolo; Gennaro Galasso; Ernesto Capuano; Stefania De Luca; Giovanni Esposito; Bruno Trimarco; Federico Piscione
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.