J Colli1, K Cotter, P Dorsey, G Mitchell, B R Lee. 1. Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, SL-42, Room 3522, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA. jcolli.tulane@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether placement of a 10 French dual lumen catheter produces a low-pressure collecting system during retrograde irrigation to induce renal hypothermia. Indication for the study is as a potential adjunct for partial nephrectomy. METHODS: Ex vivo porcine kidneys underwent harvest, and a ureteral catheter (either single lumen or dual lumen) was placed in the ureter within the renal pelvis. Pressure measurements (n = 1,080) were recorded at 1-s intervals. Irrigant flow rates were initiated at gravity and subsequently increased at 10 cc/min increments to a maximum of 100 cc/min. RESULTS: During retrograde infusion without a dual lumen catheter, every 10 cc/min rate increase resulted in an 8 cm H(2)O rise in intrarenal pressure. The maximum flow rate obtained was 20 cc/min before urinary extravasation or intrarenal drainage occurred. Maximum pressure obtained before urinary extravasation or collecting system perforation was 16 cm H(2)O. Placement of a dual lumen catheter within the renal pelvis allowed intrarenal pressures to remain less than 5 cm H(2)O (when infusion rates <80 cc/min). The maximum flow rate while maintaining pressures <20 cm H(2)O was 90 cc/min. Flow rates above 100 cc/min resulted in urinary extravasation. The maximal flow rate that is safe for collecting systems with a dual lumen catheter is 80 cc/min, and without a dual lumen catheter rates greater than 20 cc/min resulted in collecting system perforations. CONCLUSION: Using an ex vivo porcine model, application of a 10 French ureteral dual lumen catheter produced adequate retrograde drainage that resulted in low intrarenal pressures at high infusion rates (up to 80 cc/min).
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether placement of a 10 French dual lumen catheter produces a low-pressure collecting system during retrograde irrigation to induce renal hypothermia. Indication for the study is as a potential adjunct for partial nephrectomy. METHODS: Ex vivo porcine kidneys underwent harvest, and a ureteral catheter (either single lumen or dual lumen) was placed in the ureter within the renal pelvis. Pressure measurements (n = 1,080) were recorded at 1-s intervals. Irrigant flow rates were initiated at gravity and subsequently increased at 10 cc/min increments to a maximum of 100 cc/min. RESULTS: During retrograde infusion without a dual lumen catheter, every 10 cc/min rate increase resulted in an 8 cm H(2)O rise in intrarenal pressure. The maximum flow rate obtained was 20 cc/min before urinary extravasation or intrarenal drainage occurred. Maximum pressure obtained before urinary extravasation or collecting system perforation was 16 cm H(2)O. Placement of a dual lumen catheter within the renal pelvis allowed intrarenal pressures to remain less than 5 cm H(2)O (when infusion rates <80 cc/min). The maximum flow rate while maintaining pressures <20 cm H(2)O was 90 cc/min. Flow rates above 100 cc/min resulted in urinary extravasation. The maximal flow rate that is safe for collecting systems with a dual lumen catheter is 80 cc/min, and without a dual lumen catheter rates greater than 20 cc/min resulted in collecting system perforations. CONCLUSION: Using an ex vivo porcine model, application of a 10 French ureteral dual lumen catheter produced adequate retrograde drainage that resulted in low intrarenal pressures at high infusion rates (up to 80 cc/min).
Authors: Jason Hafron; Michael C Ost; Beng Jit Tan; James D Fogarty; David M Hoenig; Benjamin R Lee; Arthur D Smith Journal: Urology Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Kyle J Weld; Steven Koziol; Claudio Montiglio; Paul Sorenson; R Duane Cespedes; Jay T Bishoff Journal: Urology Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: R Houston Thompson; Brian R Lane; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; Amr Fergany; Igor Frank; Inderbir S Gill; Michael L Blute; Steven C Campbell Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jaime Landman; Ramakrishna Venkatesh; David Lee; Richard Vanlangendonck; Kevin Morissey; Gerald L Andriole; Ralph V Clayman; Chandru P Sundaram Journal: Urology Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Ryan J Nelson; Julien Dagenais; Matthew J Maurice; Jaya Sai S Chavalia; Daniel Ramirez; Peter A Caputo; Paurush Babbar; Nitin K Yerram; Jihad H Kaouk Journal: Urol Ann Date: 2018 Oct-Dec