Literature DB >> 22581274

Risk adjustment in health insurance exchanges for individuals with mental illness.

Colleen L Barry1, Jonathan P Weiner, Klaus Lemke, Susan H Busch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2014, an estimated 15 million individuals who currently do not have health insurance, including many with chronic mental illness, are expected to obtain coverage through state insurance exchanges. The authors examined how two mechanisms in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), namely, risk adjustment and reinsurance, might perform to ensure the financial solvency of health plans that have a disproportionate share of enrollees with mental health conditions. Risk adjustment is an ACA provision requiring that a federal or state exchange move funds from insurance plans with healthier enrollees to plans with sicker enrollees. Reinsurance is a provision in which all plans in the state contribute to an overall pool of money that is used to reimburse costs to individual market plans for expenditures of any individual enrollee that exceed a high predetermined level.
METHOD: Using 2006--2007 claims data from a sample of private and public health plans, the authors compared expected health plan compensation under diagnosis-based risk adjustment with actual health care expenditures, under different assumptions for chronic mental health and medical conditions. Analyses were conducted with and without the addition of $100,000 reinsurance.
RESULTS: Risk adjustment performed well for most plans. For some plans with a high share of enrollees with mental health conditions, underpayment was substantial enough to raise concern. Reinsurance appeared to be helpful in addressing the most serious underpayment problems remaining after risk adjustment. Risk adjustment performed similarly for health plan cohorts that had a disproportionate share of enrollees with chronic mental health and medical conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Cost models indicate that the regulatory provisions in the ACA requiring risk adjustment and reinsurance can help protect health plans covering treatment for mentally ill individuals against risk selection. This model analysis may be useful for advocates for individuals with mental illness in considering their own state's insurance exchange.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22581274      PMCID: PMC4436690          DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11071044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  16 in total

1.  Measuring adverse selection in managed health care.

Authors:  R G Frank; J Glazer; T G McGuire
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Risk adjustment alternatives in paying for behavioral health care under Medicaid.

Authors:  S L Ettner; R G Frank; T G McGuire; R C Hermann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Design of mental health benefits: still unequal after all these years.

Authors:  Colleen L Barry; Jon R Gabel; Richard G Frank; Samantha Hawkins; Heidi H Whitmore; Jeremy D Pickreign
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Regulating a health insurance exchange: implications for individuals with mental illness.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire; Anna D Sinaiko
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  The effect of prior-year health expenditures on health coverage plan choice.

Authors:  R P Ellis
Journal:  Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res       Date:  1985

6.  Ambulatory care groups: a categorization of diagnoses for research and management.

Authors:  B Starfield; J Weiner; L Mumford; D Steinwachs
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Risk selection and risk adjustment: improving insurance in the individual and small group markets.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; William H Dow
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Risk adjustment of mental health and substance abuse payments.

Authors:  S L Ettner; R G Frank; T G McGuire; J P Newhouse; E H Notman
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  The effect of insurance benefit changes on use of child and adolescent outpatient mental health services.

Authors:  D K Padgett; C Patrick; B J Burns; H J Schlesinger; J Cohen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix.

Authors:  J P Weiner; B H Starfield; D M Steinwachs; L M Mumford
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  8 in total

1.  Barriers and Enablers to Integrating Mental Health into Primary Care: A Policy Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Durbin; Janet Durbin; Jennifer M Hensel; Raisa Deber
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Improving the prediction model used in risk equalization: cost and diagnostic information from multiple prior years.

Authors:  S H C M van Veen; R C van Kleef; W P M M van de Ven; R C J A van Vliet
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-02-12

3.  Assessing incentives for service-level selection in private health insurance exchanges.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire; Joseph P Newhouse; Sharon-Lise Normand; Julie Shi; Samuel Zuvekas
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  Mental health collaborative care and its role in primary care settings.

Authors:  David E Goodrich; Amy M Kilbourne; Kristina M Nord; Mark S Bauer
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Primary care reform and service use by people with serious mental illness in Ontario.

Authors:  Leah S Steele; Anna Durbin; Elizabeth Lin; J Charles Victor; Julie Klein-Geltink; Richard H Glazier; Brandon Zagorski; Alexander Kopp
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2014

6.  Risk-Adjustment Simulation: Plans May Have Incentives To Distort Mental Health And Substance Use Coverage.

Authors:  Ellen Montz; Tim Layton; Alisa B Busch; Randall P Ellis; Sherri Rose; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Predicting patient outcomes in psychiatric hospitals with routine data: a machine learning approach.

Authors:  J Wolff; A Gary; D Jung; C Normann; K Kaier; H Binder; K Domschke; A Klimke; M Franz
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Predicting the risk of drug-drug interactions in psychiatric hospitals: a retrospective longitudinal pharmacovigilance study.

Authors:  Jan Wolff; Gudrun Hefner; Claus Normann; Klaus Kaier; Harald Binder; Katharina Domschke; Christoph Hiemke; Michael Marschollek; Ansgar Klimke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.