Literature DB >> 22580940

Patient selection for cytoreductive surgery in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis using serum tumor markers: an observational cohort study.

Peter H Cashin1, Wilhelm Graf, Peter Nygren, Haile Mahteme.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There were 2 objectives: first, to investigate how many patients were excluded from surgery on the basis of the radiological extent of the peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) or the clinical examination; and second, to develop a score based primarily on serum tumor markers (STMs) that could predict short cancer-specific survival (<12 months).
BACKGROUND: Patient selection and prediction of prognosis is crucial for successful treatment of colorectal PC.
METHODS: All patients with colorectal PC referred for cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (2005-2008) at Uppsala University hospital were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups-nonsurgery and surgery. Clinicopathological and laboratory parameters were collected in the surgery group. A Corep (COloREctal-Pc) score was developed using hazard ratios from histology, hematological status, serial serum tumor markers (STMs), and STM changes over time. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV), and negative predicted value (NPV) were calculated in a second validating dataset (n = 24) with a survival cutoff of less than 12 months.
RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included in the study, 42 in the nonsurgery group and 65 in the surgery group. In the nonsurgery group, 2 patients were excluded solely on the basis of the radiological extent of PC and 7 patients on clinical examination. The Corep score ranged from 0 to 18. A score of 6 or more showed a validated sensitivity of 80%, specificity 100%, PPV 1.0, and NPV 0.93.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiological extent of PC was not a main deciding factor for treatment decisions and had less impact than the clinical examination. The Corep score identified patients with short cancer-specific survival that may not be suitable for treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22580940     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318254f281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  11 in total

1.  The modified Glasgow prognostic score for early mortality in patients with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tomohiro Adachi; Takao Hinoi; Minoru Hattori; Hiroyuki Egi; Manabu Shimomura; Yasufumi Saito; Hiroyuki Sawada; Masashi Miguchi; Hiroaki Niitsu; Shoichiro Mukai; Takuya Yano; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Factors Prognostic for Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Treated with Surgery.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Jian Wang; Yamei Zhao; Xiaoxu Ge; Zhanhuai Wang; Shaojun Yu; Yongmao Song; Kefeng Ding; Suzhan Zhang; Shu Zheng; Lifeng Sun
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is an independent prognostic indicator in pseudomyxoma peritonei post cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ju-Li Koh; Winston Liauw; Terence Chua; David L Morris
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-06

Review 4.  Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review of Current and Emerging Trends in Clinical and Translational Research.

Authors:  Foteini Stefania Koumpa; Diamantis Xylas; Maciej Konopka; Dieter Galea; Kirill Veselkov; Anthony Antoniou; Akash Mehta; Reza Mirnezami
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC.

Authors:  Wilhelm Graf; Peter H Cashin; Lana Ghanipour; Malin Enblad; Johan Botling; Alexei Terman; Helgi Birgisson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Survival prognostic factors in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment: analysis from a single oncological center.

Authors:  L Graziosi; E Marino; V De Angelis; A Rebonato; A Donini
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Computerized System for Staging Peritoneal Surface Malignancies.

Authors:  Paolo Sammartino; Daniele Biacchi; Tommaso Cornali; Fabio Accarpio; Simone Sibio; Bernard Luraschi; Alessio Impagnatiello; Angelo Di Giorgio
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy and SPECT imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis using bioorthogonal click chemistry: probe selection and first proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Aurélie Rondon; Sébastien Schmitt; Arnaud Briat; Nancy Ty; Lydia Maigne; Mercedes Quintana; Rosemery Membreno; Brian M Zeglis; Isabelle Navarro-Teulon; Jean-Pierre Pouget; Jean-Michel Chezal; Elisabeth Miot-Noirault; Emmanuel Moreau; Françoise Degoul
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 11.556

9.  Neutropenia in colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Peter H Cashin; Lana Ghanipour; Malin Enblad; David L Morris
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-05-15

10.  ASO Author Reflections: Can Patient Selection for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy be Improved?

Authors:  Wilhelm Graf; Helgi Birgisson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.