Literature DB >> 22580654

Terlipressin in the treatment of late phase catecholamine-resistant septic shock.

Petr Svoboda1, Peter Scheer, Ilona Kantorová, Jaroslav Doubek, Jan Dudra, Martin Radvan, Jana Radvanova.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Norepinephrine, but also dopamine and epinephrine are recommended as first line vasopressors in the treatment of septic shock. In some patients, septic shock deteriorates and becomes to be resistant to catecholamines. In this situation, addition of vasopressin or terlipressin can be advantageous. The aim of our pilot study was to evaluate the impact of terlipressin on open label norepinephrine requirements and mortality.
METHODOLOGY: In a randomized, controlled, single centre study we assigned patients with late advanced septic shock refractory to catecholamines (norepinephrine >0.6µg/kg/min for more than 24h) to receive either continuously terlipressin 4mg/24h for 72 hours in addition to open label norepinephrine (TERLI group) or to continue therapy only with catecholamines (CON group). All vasopressor infusions were titrated to maintain a target blood pressure.
RESULTS: We enrolled 30 patients, of whom 13 were assigned to terlipressin and in 17 we continued in catecholamine therapy. There was no significant difference in norepinephrine consumption between the groups. Open label norepinephrine infusion rates decreased significantly in the TERLI group as compared with initial consumption, but the decrease we observed only in 7 (54%) patients. There was no significant difference between groups in the rate of death at day 28 (77% in TERLI group and 94% in CON group; p=0.18) or at day 90 (91% vs. 94%; p=0.85).
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous terlipressin infusion was not effective in reducing norepinephrine consumption or in the mortality of patients, if administered in late phase of catecholamine refractory septic shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22580654     DOI: 10.5754/hge10550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of Norepinephrine and Terlipressin vs Norepinephrine Alone for Management of Septic Shock: A Randomized Control Study.

Authors:  Pallavi Sahoo; Nikhil Kothari; Shilpa Goyal; Ankur Sharma; Pradeep K Bhatia
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-06

Review 2.  Association of Vasopressin Plus Catecholamine Vasopressors vs Catecholamines Alone With Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Distributive Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  William F McIntyre; Kevin J Um; Waleed Alhazzani; Alexandra P Lengyel; Ludhmila Hajjar; Anthony C Gordon; François Lamontagne; Jeff S Healey; Richard P Whitlock; Emilie P Belley-Côté
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Vasopressors for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tomer Avni; Adi Lador; Shaul Lev; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul; Alon Grossman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of first-line and second-line terlipressin versus sole norepinephrine in fulminant ovine septic shock.

Authors:  Tim G Kampmeier; Philip H Arnemann; Michael Hessler; Laura M Seidel; Karsten Becker; Andrea Morelli; Sebastian W Rehberg; Christian Ertmer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Terlipressin for septic shock patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Yibing Zhu; Huibin Huang; Xiuming Xi; Bin Du
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2019-03-12

6.  Clinical Efficiency of Vasopressin or Its Analogs in Comparison With Catecholamines Alone on Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ren-Qi Yao; De-Meng Xia; Li-Xue Wang; Guo-Sheng Wu; Yi-Bing Zhu; Hong-Qiang Zhao; Qi Liu; Zhao-Fan Xia; Chao Ren; Yong-Ming Yao
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Terlipressin for the treatment of septic shock in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lili Huang; Shi Zhang; Wei Chang; Feiping Xia; Songqiao Liu; Yi Yang; Haibo Qiu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Successful management of an inadvertent excessive treprostinil overdose.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Juergen Hornig; Norbert Friedel; Paul Zarogoulidis; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis; Johannes Brachmann
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 9.  Non-Adrenergic Vasopressors in Patients with or at Risk for Vasodilatory Shock. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Alessandro Belletti; Mario Musu; Simona Silvetti; Omar Saleh; Laura Pasin; Fabrizio Monaco; Ludhmila A Hajjar; Evgeny Fominskiy; Gabriele Finco; Alberto Zangrillo; Giovanni Landoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Comparative safety and efficacy of vasopressors for mortality in septic shock: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Myura Nagendran; Mahiben Maruthappu; Anthony C Gordon; Kurinchi S Gurusamy
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.