Literature DB >> 22580120

Optimal timing for assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer: do all patients benefit from waiting longer than 6 weeks?

Rodrigo O Perez1, Angelita Habr-Gama, Guilherme P São Julião, Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues, Afonso H S Sousa, Fabio Guilherme Campos, Antonio R Imperiale, Patricio B Lynn, Igor Proscurshim, Sergio Carlos Nahas, Carla Rachel Ono, Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the metabolic activity of rectal cancers at 6 and 12 weeks after completion of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) by 2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-labeled positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([(18)FDG]PET/CT) imaging and correlate with response to CRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 distal rectal adenocarcinoma treated with long-course neoadjuvant CRT (54 Gy, 5-fluouracil-based) were prospectively studied (ClinicalTrials.org identifier NCT00254683). All patients underwent 3 PET/CT studies (at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks from CRT completion). Clinical assessment was at 12 weeks. Maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor was measured and recorded at each PET/CT study after 1 h (early) and 3 h (late) from (18)FDG injection. Patients with an increase in early SUVmax between 6 and 12 weeks were considered "bad" responders and the others as "good" responders.
RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were included; 46 patients (51%) were "bad" responders, whereas 45 (49%) patients were "good" responders. "Bad" responders were less likely to develop complete clinical response (6.5% vs. 37.8%, respectively; P=.001), less likely to develop significant histological tumor regression (complete or near-complete pathological response; 16% vs. 45%, respectively; P=.008) and exhibited greater final tumor dimension (4.3 cm vs. 3.3 cm; P=.03). Decrease between early (1 h) and late (3 h) SUVmax at 6-week PET/CT was a significant predictor of "good" response (accuracy of 67%).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who developed an increase in SUVmax after 6 weeks were less likely to develop significant tumor downstaging. Early-late SUVmax variation at 6-week PET/CT may help identify these patients and allow tailored selection of CRT-surgery intervals for individual patients.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22580120     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  18 in total

Review 1.  Management of the Complete Clinical Response.

Authors:  Angelita Habr-Gama; Guilherme Pagin São Julião; Bruna Borba Vailati; Ivana Castro; Debora Raffaele
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 2.  Interval to surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nir Wasserberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Predicting complete response to neoadjuvant CRT for distal rectal cancer using sequential PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  R O Perez; A Habr-Gama; G P São Julião; P B Lynn; C Sabbagh; I Proscurshim; F G Campos; J Gama-Rodrigues; S C Nahas; C A Buchpiguel
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Tumour response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation within lateral pelvic nodes: another step towards precision surgery.

Authors:  R O Perez; M D Daneri; B Vailati; G P São Julião
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Extended Intervals after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: The Key to Improved Tumor Response and Potential Organ Preservation.

Authors:  Christian P Probst; Adan Z Becerra; Christopher T Aquina; Mohamedtaki A Tejani; Steven D Wexner; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Feza H Remzi; David W Dietz; John R T Monson; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the rectum: a poor candidate for neo-adjuvant chemoradiation?

Authors:  Vijai Simha; Rakesh Kapoor; Rajesh Gupta; Amit Bahl; Ritambhara Nada
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-08

Review 7.  How reliable is current imaging in restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?

Authors:  Paola De Nardi; Michele Carvello
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Outcome of rectal cancer after radiotherapy with a long or short waiting period before surgery, a descriptive clinical study.

Authors:  Elmer E van Eeghen; Frank den Boer; Sandra D Bakker; Ruud J L F Loffeld
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-06

9.  Clinical outcome of patients with complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers: the Indian scenario.

Authors:  Snita Sinukumar; Prachi Patil; Reena Engineer; Ashwin Desouza; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 10.  Optimal Time Intervals between Pre-Operative Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery in Rectal Cancer?

Authors:  Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.